Rumor What's going on in Portland?

So you're not upset about the spray painting then? Or you are? I don't have a strong opinion about it.

 

im not getting in the middle of this but prosecutors and judges prosecute from crimes that someone didn’t intend or know would happen.

for example all the time on first 48, a driver gets charged with murder when they (the driver) thought his buddies were just gonna rob someone but it went wrong and someone was murdered in the robbery.

 

i am not. Im frustrated with some people dismissing criminal activity in portland while condemning it in dc.

 

From what I've seen people are generally concerned about the same criminal activity in both places.

I've seen no evidence to suggest otherwise.

 

if you are referring to this, it reads as though its

not a matter of whether he should be charged even if he didnt know. The argument see t be he is lieing and he knew all along. Had prior knowledge of a gun being used.

if a capital rioter knew the goal of their affiliates were to harm people, then they should be charged the same as those causing the harm.
In this instance it seems the dispute is about prior knowledge or not. Not that he is guilty of murder regardless.

 

okay. Lol.

 

i already posted quotes showing how some dismissed what was going on in portland. They werent calling for arrests of criminal activity.
Not sure what more you need?

or is this part of that dismissal thing?

 

Nobody that I'm seeing is complaining about any of that kind of thing in DC. So... it's really just the violent crushing, dismembering, and killing people, breaking into the building during session, hunting for members of congress and the vice president with intentions on killing them as well.

 

This happened prior to jan6th. No complaining could be had. Its also a different thread than jan6th...

it doesn't matter though. Im fairly confident no matter what evidence i provide to back up my stance, you will ignore or dismiss it.

 

lets see how you spin this.....

 

I suppose I should let @illmatic99 speak for themselves, and I know you'll just say that I'm spinning, because it's your word of the week, but it doesn't at all appear to me that they are advocating for the man to be killed, but rather questioning how someone could break into the congress floor without being shot.

 

wait, howd i get dragged into this? lol I currently have @Orion Bailey on ignore. Don't need his nonsense in my browsing of this forum at the moment.

and yes, that's obviously what i was saying. Trespassers in the Capitol you would expect to get shot. The Capitol police once killed a woman by shooting her 26 times for entering a restricted area outside while she w as making a U-turn.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...32bdbe-5a51-11eb-a976-bad6431e03e2_story.html

 

But trespassers of a federal building downtown portland shouldn't be shot?

lol.
Ignore me ignore the truth ignore any one not agreeing with you...

talk Bout head in sand.

 

didnt read that way to me and im putting context of other comments into consideration.

whether he is saying he should be or isnt he is saying it should be expected.
Then it should be expected if you break into a police hq and try to set it on fire you should be shot.

its this onesidism that is hilariously appauling.
I do love the spin. And yes its my word of the week because its yours and a few others behavior of the year.

 

So you didn't ask them to make sure of their intent? You just did what you are always yelling about in here and made an assumption. The wrong one, it turns out.
All of the things you rail on the most in here are the behaviors you exhibit more than anyone.

 

Where is your evidence of people dismissing Portlanders breaking into public buildings while in session and literally hunting for public leaders?

I'm absolutely fine with anybody who is burning pallets against the walls of buildings being arrested.

I'm also 100% fine with shooting anybody who is storming an occupied public building.

 

no but thanks for doing the same thing. I think he is bsing to save ass. Nothing more.
Seen it many tomes here. Nothing new.

but thanks for doing what you accused me of doing...


Also. Yelling. Lol.
Thats funny shit.

 

Was there anybody in the building when it was broken into? If so, then sure. I have no problem with shooting people who are breaking into occupied public buildings.

If it's an empty building and you're shooting people in the back there are probably other tactics you could take.

 

omfg. Semantics. I knew you would do that. They broke into the police building, trapped people inside and set fire to the damn building.


Evidence is all over the damn news.

head in sand?

 

Then yeah, absolutely. If somebody is breaking into an occupied building or house I'm 100% ok with shooting that person in self defense.