Notice what this means for the blazers home games

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Mr. Robot, May 12, 2021.

  1. Mr. Robot

    Mr. Robot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2017
    Messages:
    4,482
    Likes Received:
    4,114
    Trophy Points:
    113
  2. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    22,660
    Likes Received:
    15,098
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have no problem penalizing people who do not get vaccinated (By not letting them into events at enclosed buildings) but this sounds like she will penalize everyone if they do not reach her specified goal. I have a problem with that. She needs to make exceptions. Still pissed about the spring game at Autzen.
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  3. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,881
    Likes Received:
    3,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The whole approach is nonsensical. Why are county infection rates unimportant when 70% of people are vaccinated? Doesn't that make those same thresholds meaningless now?

    Rural counties get their restrictions lifted when the rest of the state hits a high enough vax percentage, but their lower vax rate holds the rest of the state down until then. Uh...

    If you wanted to really accomplish something, you would do away with rigid thresholds and look at vaccination (and/or infection) rates relative to population density variations, and apply restrictions accordingly.

    I agree with Pinwheel, the overall message is the opposite of what they're trying to send, punishing the cooperative ones who have no influence on the holdouts.
     
  4. JoshuaHall

    JoshuaHall Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2018
    Messages:
    1,298
    Likes Received:
    1,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just open it back up

    pack the rose garden, no restrictions

    those that want to be vaxxed are

    let the games begin
     
    Wizard Mentor likes this.
  5. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,613
    Trophy Points:
    113
    From what I've read, Multnomah County is already at 63% vaccinated, and should be a shoo-in to reach the 65% threshold by next week and be moved to "lower" risk as of May 21.

    Not sure how anyone sees this as the cooperative counties being punished. :dunno:
     
  6. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,050
    Likes Received:
    35,326
    Trophy Points:
    113
    2 more months of high risk to extreme risk for a Blazers game. Seems legit.

    I just got my 2nd shot yesterday. I had 5g before it, I'm not microchipped, no Mark of the beast. What a letdown.
     
  7. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,881
    Likes Received:
    3,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You may be right, if Multnomah leads the pack and hits lower restrictions before the other big counties, and before the state would hit the 70% no-restrictions if not for the smaller counties. All that matters is getting [more] fans in the stands by the start of the playoffs! That and minimizing deaths and business closings...

    I think what bothers me most about the announcement is, it's basically an admission that the risk level roller coaster was a mistake. They're trying to side step to a new standard without addressing that issue, and it's not clear yet how the new standard will affect different parts of the state relative to each other.
     

Share This Page