Trade Ideas Thread

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BonesJones, Apr 28, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,589
    Likes Received:
    56,022
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    upload_2021-8-23_12-43-58.png

    Dame
    Powell
    Warren
    Roco
    KAT
     
  2. AmirIcon

    AmirIcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,123
    Likes Received:
    6,084
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We had no shot at getting Wood so pretty irrelevant to us acquiring Roco or not.
     
  3. tykendo

    tykendo Don't Tread On PDX

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    7,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would Minnesota or Indiana do that?
     
  4. tykendo

    tykendo Don't Tread On PDX

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    7,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "WE" might not be, but the Blazers might very well, Stray Puddy.
     
  5. tykendo

    tykendo Don't Tread On PDX

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    7,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Texas froze over last year. That's pretty damn close.
     
    dviss1, Strenuus, BBert and 1 other person like this.
  6. SlyPokerCat

    SlyPokerCat cats rool dogs drool

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Messages:
    4,646
    Likes Received:
    6,217
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bet you $500 we don't win a championship next year if you are that confident.
     
  7. tykendo

    tykendo Don't Tread On PDX

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    7,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm poor. I had to move back to Colorado so i could share the rent. Plus i have cats, and when you turn your back , they tend to be not very trustworthy.
     
    GoBlazersGo and SlyPokerCat like this.
  8. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agree about Indy not really wanting CJ, but rather than Minny, I was thinking that Toronto was the ones who got robbed in that. Wolves get Siakam and a first for KAT (who supposedly wants out), and adds a solid defensive center in Nurkic--that's not a bad reimage of their roster.
     
  9. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,589
    Likes Received:
    56,022
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    ya if any team got the short end, I thought it woulda been toronto. Need to rework this.
     
  10. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    15,628
    Likes Received:
    16,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If Olshey just pulled off these two trades I would be ecstatic. No I don't hate Nurk, I just don't like his fit with Simmons.
    upload_2021-8-24_11-3-17.png upload_2021-8-24_11-6-17.png
     
  11. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,754
    Likes Received:
    55,382
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    That feels like a massive overpay for Boucher.
     
    PCmor7, AmirIcon, RR7 and 2 others like this.
  12. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except what you're really paying for is the ability to put a quality shooter at the 5 alongside Simmons, as well as a backup PG (I know it's hard to recognize those since we haven't had one here in forever...)
     
    blazerkor likes this.
  13. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,754
    Likes Received:
    55,382
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Probably don't need a backup pointguard if you get Simmons.
     
  14. Freshtown

    Freshtown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,390
    Likes Received:
    2,072
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They’re not gonna trade Malachi Flynn I don’t think. He’s gonna be good. Nice young piece, akin to maxey. More than a throw in.
     
    PtldPlatypus likes this.
  15. tykendo

    tykendo Don't Tread On PDX

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    7,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nurk would be great next to Mr. Nightlife. Trading Nurk in that scenario leaves a major whole in the frontcourt. Pass!
     
  16. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,012
    Likes Received:
    14,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    On defense, sure. On offense, it would be worse than Joel Embiid.
     
    blazerkor likes this.
  17. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no it wouldn’t. Nurk is a much better playmaker than Embiid, even while being shackled by Stotts. He’s also improved as an outside shooter, albeit on low volume. I doubt he’s a 40% shooter with more looks, but there’s no reason he couldn’t be as good of a shooter as Embiid. He also doesn’t clog the paint with touches. Nurk is a role player that can feature more. Embiid is a straight feature player that demands the ball.
     
  18. PCmor7

    PCmor7 Generational Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    7,773
    Likes Received:
    11,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Saying this for years
    I see these trade ideas and keep thinking we're always overpaying. Then, when someone points out that we're overpaying, the person proposing the trade seems to come back offering to add even more Blazers' assets to sweeten the pot ....
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  19. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    15,628
    Likes Received:
    16,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Right now it doesn't matter what we pay, it matters what we get. If we have to "overpay" to put the best team on the floor, so be it.
     
  20. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    15,628
    Likes Received:
    16,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Boucher protects the paint on defense. The thing he does on D that Nurk can't is get out on the perimeter and then recover to still protect the paint. On offense the guy either hits spot up threes or he cleans up... not as dynamic as Nurk but would be more of what we need. Simmons is close to as big as Nurk. No holes would be left IMO.

    Simmons and Nurk together on offense would be redundant and I don't see them as a fit. I also think that while Nurk is a first class defender in the paint, he isn't mobile enough for certain aspects of today's game. With the roster we have now and if we just add a better forward that doesn't have all of the unique skills of Simmons... I would keep Nurk for sure.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page