They do happen, and I don't think she's stating that men have no emotions. But there aren't laws that exacerbate things against men in these situations.
Let's say it's to be a mutual decision. If the man wants it and the woman who has to carry it for 9 months doesn't, what then?
@SlyPokerDog liked your remark. I suppose that means he understands your thoughts. That's a good thing, particularly so because he made the initial assertion.
No. My position removes nobody's right to their own body. Yours does. Not only that, it gives another individual the right to control what somebody else does with their own body. It's not the same. It's despicable and shows a complete disrespect for every woman. And there is no benefit to society. So there is no positive side to your proposal. Only misery and pain.
So you've never masterbated huh? If so, using your philosophy, you've killed millions of unborn humans. Your position is for a fertilized egg which in the best circumstances doesn't reach full term over 50% of the time at the expense of an existing human life, lower crime rates, and less human suffering. This is the problem with getting morals from books. I used to have a tolerance for religion, but the more I read the stances in here the more I think I should ban my kids from attending any church or religious function. This is absolutely disgusting.
and then you would be wrong. i left a large gap between my first sentence referencing the quote and my general statement of some here, to help segregate my comment. Even though i thought you might think i was only speaking of you… i didnt care enough to detail it all out.
