Are you not aware that the people you have been supporting have been supporting Putin talking points themselves?
Guess not. We've been moving the last couple of weeks. Missed all of that Republicans-in-bed-with-Putin mantra.
Ditching vodka to protest Russia? You might be surprised where that bottle is actually from. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...bottle-is-actually-from/ar-AAUlKqD?li=BBnb7Kz
We'll start with last night and then move slowly to the first impeachment of Trump and then onto Manafort and Gates. http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/go...peaks-at-white-nationalist-conference.373896/
Portland professor explains history of Russia and Ukraine. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...ussia-and-ukraine/ar-AAUl6op?ocid=hplocalnews
Have fun with all of them. If they speak for the entire Republican Party, then I'm not interested. Thanks.
Greene spoke at CPAC today and at a different conference last night. CPAC is something you yourself stated were very interested in just yesterday in a different thread. I believe you were/are interested in it because they do set tone, direction, and agenda for the Republican party. Maybe you should look into the actual words being said by those speaking at the conference. Greene just last night attended and spoke at a white supremacist conference that praised Putin and Russia and then spoke at CPAC today and praised Ukraine and their president. That really should be a concern. And if it's really not for you I think that's a discussion worth having.
Anybody want to buy some Art to support refugees in Ukraine? Check out this awesome local artist: https://www.instagram.com/postsovietart/?hl=en https://tatyanaostapenko.com/ukraine
I'm not following every speaker at CPAC. Certainly not Greene! She's a bit whack. But, I'm sure you'd agree,
So you aren't paying attention to CPAC which sets the Republican agenda after you said you were? Plausible deniability?
I think she is very sane. The fact that she is stating opposite opinions at different conferences confirms that. I think that makes her vile and dangerous. I also believe something as important to Republican supporters such as yourself would give this dangerous person a coveted speaking slot reflects very poorly on CPAC. Just dismissing her as some sort of goofy "whack" is also dangerous.
Is there someone in the Democratic party espousing Naziism and flinging batty conspiracy theories like a chimp flings shit? Is there a Democrat openly telling their constituents to war with Republican counterparts? The Dems are far from perfect, far, but they have not gone so low and probably never will as I have seen on the other side.
