No, democrats have to seperate themselves somehow. Democrats and Republicans are the same in that neither really cares about the platform. They are the same in that they care about their position in and support from their respective party over all else.
Murder charge is DROPPED against Texas woman, 26, three days after she was arrested for performing 'self-inducted abortion' Lizelle Herrera, 26, was cleared of all charges Sunday by the local district attorney in Starr County, Texas She was originally arrested Thursday after allegedly terminating her pregnancy Police said she 'intentionally and knowingly caused the death of an individual by self-induced abortion' It is unclear how far along Herrera was in her pregnancy A recently passed Texas law bans all abortions after the first detection of an embryonic 'heartbeat' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...arrest-performing-self-inducted-abortion.html
https://aclj.org/pro-life/official-...lead-to-unintended-and-undesirable-conclusion Hard to say. Official Analysis by Pro-Abortion-Majority Committee Staff on California Abortion Bill Confirms What We've Been Saying – "'Perinatal Death' Language Could Lead to Unintended and Undesirable Conclusion"
And you've read the actual bill or just one person's opinion on it that they're using to ask for money?
So you saw the part that says "perinatal death due to a pregnancy-related cause." That invalidates what you and the article you posted are claiming.
I said they'd better get the Bill(s) worded correctly. That's exactly what being discussed. “Perinatal Death” - Second, the “perinatal death” language could lead to an unintended and undesirable conclusion. As currently in print, it may not be sufficiently clear that “perinatal death” is intended to be the consequence of a pregnancy complication. Thus, the bill could be interpreted to immunize a pregnant person from all criminal penalties for all pregnancy outcomes, including the death of a newborn for any reason during the “perinatal” period after birth, including a cause of death which is not attributable to pregnancy complications, which clearly is not the author’s intent. While the bill does not define “perinatal,” the term is generally used to describe the period from approximately past 22 (or 28) completed weeks of pregnancy up to 7 completed days of life. (L.S.Bakketeig, P.Bergsjø, “Perinatal Epidemiology.” International Encyclopedia of Public Health (2008), p. 45.) Welfare & Institutions Code Section 13134.5(b) defines perinatal as "the period from the establishment of pregnancy to one month following delivery." In order to clarify that the bill’s immunity provision is only intended to apply to a perinatal death after a live birth when the cause of death is directly attributable to pregnancy, the author proposes the following clarifying amendment on Page 7, at line 10: insert “due to a pregnancy related cause” at the end of the sentence. Reflecting both of the above-proposed amendments, the entire subdivision would read as follows:
I know I like to get all my news from a website that has a page for articles calling out the radical left. You don't?
including the death of a newborn for any reason during the “perinatal” period after birth, including a cause of death which is not attributable to pregnancy complications That statement is wrong. The bill says this: perinatal death due to a pregnancy-related cause
If you wanna live in an echo chamber have at it. Places reporting on "Democrat meltdowns" based on biased interpretations and opinions seems like a great source to hang your hat on.
The Hearing was on April 5th. Perhaps the Bill's language has since been updated. Again, this was from the Hearing: In order to clarify that the bill’s immunity provision is only intended to apply to a perinatal death after a live birth when the cause of death is directly attributable to pregnancy, the author proposes the following clarifying amendment on Page 7, at line 10: insert “due to a pregnancy related cause” at the end of the sentence. Reflecting both of the above-proposed amendments, the entire subdivision would read as follows: 123467. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights under this article, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death due to a pregnancy-related cause.
Yes, and the bullshit article you posted was from today and it intentionally omitted the updated and most recent revision of the bill in an attempt to solicit donations.
Apparently, Catholics aren't especially enamored with the verbiage. https://cacatholic.org/article/ab-2223-fails-clarify-question-infanticide-protections
From the article you just posted: the bill that seeks to decriminalize infant deaths from pregnancy-related causes So infant deaths from pregnancy-related causes should be criminalized?!? What, in your opinion, should be the criminal penalty for a miscarriage? What, in your opinion, should be the criminal penalty for a genetic defect that results in the infant dying after they are born?
