Exclusive Meltdown Thread

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by kjironman1, Nov 12, 2017.

?

This is the thread to end all after loss threads. Should we make this a membership only thread?

  1. Yes

    29 vote(s)
    51.8%
  2. No

    27 vote(s)
    48.2%
  1. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,709
    Likes Received:
    3,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    Oh ye of little meltdown faith. Come on man you KNOW people are gonna melt down. At a bare minimum HCP is going to rage about how many threads there are and how uniformed and foolish non-insiders are, no doubt with a disdainful shake of the head.

    So really, you are going to be in for a shock with how many meltdowns there are. I think we might see meltdowns at a record setting pace. If we are somehow really good (Sharpe and/or Scoot explode and DeAndre has a renaissance season.) you will still see meltdowns. There just isn't any realistic scenario in which members of this forum aren't melting down unless your block list is a mile long.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2023
    blazerkor and kjironman1 like this.
  2. Whyachi

    Whyachi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2023
    Messages:
    7,479
    Likes Received:
    4,081
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Shaedon's benchings were bad last season. There were 14 games where Sharpe played less then 15m. Some of Shaedon's minutes in that limited action was garbage time cleanup.

    If Billups "forgets" to put Sharpe in competitive rotations this season... EVERY Blazer fan deserves a meltdown.
     
  3. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,462
    Likes Received:
    22,160
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The kid needs to play. I am never going to be the one pulling for a team to tank, but now that they have tanked and picked up a couple players they need to follow through and play those players even if it means being a lotto team again.
     
  4. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,462
    Likes Received:
    22,160
    Trophy Points:
    113
    After watching Dame drop 39 in his opener and Ice a victory in true Dame Time fashion I figured it’s time to bump this thread.
     
    BIG Q, Phatguysrule and SlyPokerDog like this.
  5. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,730
    Likes Received:
    55,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Did people really think this isn’t how it’s gonna play out?
     
  6. HoopsFanAZ

    HoopsFanAZ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2022
    Messages:
    811
    Likes Received:
    929
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Arizona
    Praise the growth.
    Count up all the losses. There will be many. Many.
    Go Blazers!
     
  7. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,462
    Likes Received:
    22,160
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think most of us absolutely knew it was going to play out like this. That is exactly why some of us are a little irritated at this point.
    Spend the fucking money and bring players here to win a fucking CHAMPIONSHIP. Quit Fucking running off the best players this team ever gets.
    It's pretty simple actually.
     
  8. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,730
    Likes Received:
    55,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    How?

    Oh gosh, maybe you should be the GM.
     
    Idog1976 likes this.
  9. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,462
    Likes Received:
    22,160
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you think they could not have spent their money better and gotten better returns for their players than they did over the course of time that dame was playing for Portland then I simply don't know how to respond to you?
     
    blazerkor likes this.
  10. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,730
    Likes Received:
    55,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Spent their money better!?!?

    Give me some examples. Neil was a moron but I don't think money had anything to do with it. He fucked up the Collins draft and he kept CJ too long, but again... money didn't mean shit. It was an inability to acquire players and that's not such an easy thing to do.
     
  11. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,048
    Likes Received:
    35,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you're upset at previous GM? Becauuuuse, we dont exactly have the goods to build just with cash and assets. We'd have to overpay for one player and then overpay for a 2nd one. We have seen no one comes here on min contracts to ring chase. And we had Dame.

    So why exactly are we blaming the current status? It was Olsheys doing, this was inevitable.

    There A) Has to be players that we can overpay (Do you want Harden?)

    and B) Has to be good to great role players available (We need A to happen first).

    Just confused as to why you're surprised and irritated about where we are at given the previous few years and the fallout of that coupled with the fact we're Portland and there arent enough elite level stars that'll just magically appear here. We're a mid-market in an undesirable location, we have to build through the draft. We have to essentially get lucky and have Damian Lillards drop in our laps and then its up to the GM to work around that (See: Olshey).

    So I dont understand why you're irritated about the inevitableness that we find ourselves in. This is the reality.
     
  12. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,730
    Likes Received:
    55,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Neil was garbage. That's pretty much a fact. But I have been happy with what Joe has done, and I guess he's technically the one who "ran Dame off."
     
    Phatguysrule and Strenuus like this.
  13. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,517
    Likes Received:
    16,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, Olshey should have definitely done that.

    Wasn't in the cards for Cronin. We didn't have enough.
     
    Idog1976 and Strenuus like this.
  14. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,048
    Likes Received:
    35,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Neil thought Allen Crabbe and Meyers Leonard were the answers when EVERYONE else knew they weren't.

    Evan Turner was shocked he got a huge pay day.

    Olshey killed the current and future blazers. Joe is tasked with tearing it to the studs and making that lull of future blazer suckage last as short as possible.

    But we headed to this point because of Olshey, not because of Cronin.
     
  15. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,462
    Likes Received:
    22,160
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not exactly certain Joe had not made this decision well before it became apparent?
    Yes Olshey screwed the pooch.
    My posts are simply in response to watching a great player that was once a Blazer dominate again for another team. Since being a Blazer fan this has happened a number of times. Not to mention injuries and drafting players whom had red flags in their medical records.
    Then I watch teams throughout the NBA continually keep great players and make moves to build contending rosters.
    I get it- Right now the Blazers best moves are to build through the draft. There is no question there. They need to bring along the young guys and lose to win.

    This just sucks man.
    [​IMG]

    So then there is this movement that the NBA wants to add a couple teams. Presumably Seattle and Las Vegas.
    How long do you think it will be before one of if not both of those teams are contending? My bet is it certainly won't be as long as Lillard was here.
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  16. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,517
    Likes Received:
    16,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, I feel all of that as well. I think we all feel it and that's why it gets contentious.

    And it probably isn't helped knowing that Vulcan still has their finger on this team while Phil Knight is eager to buy...
     
  17. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,462
    Likes Received:
    22,160
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dude??? Just rub some salt into it will ya?
    Please sell the team Jody.
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  18. sheed30

    sheed30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I to want Knight to get the team, but at the same time, the reports of the price he wants to buy us for compared to what Jordan just got for selling the Hornets, kinda looks bad on Knight. If he really wants the team he needs to up his offer.
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  19. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,517
    Likes Received:
    16,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can't believe the difference between $2 billion and $3 billion is much of a sticking point for Knight.

    If that's the value that's the value. Pro teams get a great return on investment.

    I don't think Knight would have any trouble coming up with $3 billion
     
  20. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,462
    Likes Received:
    22,160
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's at this point of your post that I simply quit reading.
    No it was not "Inevitable".
     

Share This Page