Official Jerami Grant trade rumors/ideas thread

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Natebishop3, Sep 28, 2023.

  1. SharpesTriumph

    SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2018
    Messages:
    10,373
    Likes Received:
    9,331
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd trade Grant if we can get a couple picks. But happy to sit back and keep him until next year if we don't get a good offer.

    Brogdon I'd probably accept a bit less maybe just 1 good FRP for. Or two if we take on a bad contract. He's going to be on an expiring deal in the summer and is older.

    Happy to keep Brogdon too if there's no great assets offered. It's a nice position to be in that we're sellers in a market with so many buyers. But we have no urgency to get a deal done soon as both guys are great productive vets. That's just a great bargaining position to be in to extract maximum value.

    If Scoot was a ROY level stud I'd be more inclined to explore Ant trades. With him looking very poor, yes in a small sample size, I'd hold off any such trades unless we're getting a haul for Ant. Scoot might ultimately be best as a career backup, and Ant might be exactly what we want at starting PG next to Shae. Too many unknowns and this team is to far away from contending to be certain about how all of our youth fits. We need more time to evaluate that, hopefully everyone gets healthy and realizes more of their long term potential.

    So glad that we are in a position to explore these long term opportunities and dont have so many underperforming old vets on overpaid contracts with shitty draft picks.
     
  2. BankTeller

    BankTeller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2021
    Messages:
    2,691
    Likes Received:
    2,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For me, the minimum on a Brogdon return should be a 1st, plus filler that Chicago would want so we can get our 1st back, essentially 2 1sts. Injuries closer to January will make teams more desperate, I think we’ll end up getting trading him at our intended price at the deadline.

    I’m with you on Grant. Unless we find two forwards who can start that we are confident can become better than Grant, trade him. Right now, there is no such forward.
     
  3. Charcoal Filtered

    Charcoal Filtered Writing Team

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,739
    Likes Received:
    2,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We do not need to get the pick back from Chicago. There is no reason to be trading our pick in the near future and it converts to a second round pick in 2028. At best, it is never a lottery pick.

    Grant would be a great fit right now in Golden State. Too bad for them we have incentive to not help. Would love to trade them for Kuminga though.
     
    BIG Q likes this.
  4. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,701
    Likes Received:
    36,253
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd imagine there's still some pretty bad blood bubbling between the two front offices...and maybe even ownership. Of course, Bob Myers isn't the Warriors GM anymore, so maybe.....

    Warriors do have their 1st round picks available in 2026, 2027, 2028. But they are also looking at this, in terms of their core+:

    Stephen Curry 35
    Klay Thompson 33
    Chris Paul 38
    Draymond Green 33
    Gary Payton II 31

    so I'd imagine they will be real reluctant to mortgage two of those picks

    as for Kuminga, I am honestly baffled how he became so highly valued in this forum. I have seen him play several times and have not been impressed. He's not a good rebounder or passer. He's not a good shooter. Look at the regression of his advanced numbers:

    upload_2023-11-29_8-43-27.png

    obviously, a small sample size this season, but the trend-lines in PER, TS%, Reb%, Ast%, Winshares, and BPM are all pointed down. And that he's under 68% as a FT shooter isn't a sign that normally points to improvements in overall shooting
     
  5. Charcoal Filtered

    Charcoal Filtered Writing Team

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,739
    Likes Received:
    2,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The age of the roster would be the reason for mortgaging future picks. Think they made their decision to run with this group when they resigned Green then traded for Paul. I would not be surprised if they try to make a big move before the deadline with picks plus Paul and/or Wiggins.

    With Kuminga, he is still young. I can only speak for myself when saying I am not valuing him much at the moment. It would be buying low and giving him a change of scenery.
     
  6. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,701
    Likes Received:
    36,253
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeah, I suspected that

    I think Portland already has a Kuminga-similar player in Camara who is a better rebounder and defender; and Camara is signed for 3 seasons after this one while Kuminga only has next season before he's due a new contract
     
  7. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    15,625
    Likes Received:
    16,768
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Jerace Wallace isn't getting any PT in Indy but I still love him. Do you think we could get Indy to send us Wallace and send Hield to the Nets who would send us a first (PHX 2025) with Jerami going to Indy?

    Indy doesn't have enough actual forwards and they could use another reliable scorer who doesn't hurt their D.
     
  8. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't know whether BRK would give up that '25 first for Hield, but yeah, if we could get Walker and a first for Grant, that sounds like a good deal to me.
     
    blazerkor likes this.
  9. blazerfan11

    blazerfan11 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    10,713
    Likes Received:
    10,832
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Taylor Hendricks is in the G-league for Utah. He doesn't have the all-around game as Jarace, but he's a shot blocker who can hit 3-pointers.
     
  10. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Utah already has Markkanen and Collins at PF. Why would they want Grant?
     
  11. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,358
    Likes Received:
    12,483
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Saw a suggestion some liked on RealGM that basically boiled down to

    Sacramento out: Barnes, Davion, 1st
    In: Grant

    NYK Out: Fournier, 1st
    In: Barnes, Davion

    PDX Out: Grant
    In: Fournier, 2 1sts.

    I don't love it. I mean, more 1st is nice, but I don't think Grant is that bad of a contract, personally, and he gives us a reliable vet for when our offense gets bogged down, much the way Simon will when he returns. Yes, Scoot and Sharpe are the future, but I want them developing alongside actual NBA players, not G-League level talent.
     
  12. Charcoal Filtered

    Charcoal Filtered Writing Team

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,739
    Likes Received:
    2,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If that trade were to go down, take NY out of it. Agree with you though and would pass since we do not need more low 1st round picks and it could hinder the development of our young roster.
     
    RR7 likes this.
  13. blazerfan11

    blazerfan11 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    10,713
    Likes Received:
    10,832
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is Grant even a "Bad Contract?" Right now he's shooting 42% on 3-pointers and getting 23 points per game.

    Michael Porter Jr is a similar power forward (more rebounds, fewer free throws and points) and he's making $33.3 million this season and $35.8 million next season.

    (Blue is Player Option.)

    upload_2023-11-29_13-8-2.png

    upload_2023-11-29_13-8-51.png
     
  14. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    22,666
    Likes Received:
    15,100
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Right now one could argue that Grant is underpaid......he is playing really well. Probably too well to sustain on offense.
     
  15. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,588
    Likes Received:
    56,019
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    This should work at the deadline.

    To GS:
    Grant
    Kleber

    To Dallas:
    Thybulle

    To POR:
    Chris Paul
    Kuminga
    1st from Dallas.

    Then work out a buyout or another move for Paul.

    The guy I've been wanting to add desperately is Kuminga. He can't catch a break with Steve Kerr. Not allowed to make any mistakes and has his minutes jerked around every game so he's unable to develop. They could use some wing depth and Grant could help.
     
  16. BankTeller

    BankTeller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2021
    Messages:
    2,691
    Likes Received:
    2,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would not consider Grant a bad contract. You could argue that he will not be living up to $36.5m at 34 if he opts in, but by then, it is just an expiring contract so who cares.

    The figure isn’t really what makes the contract bad, it’s the 5 years. But even then, he’s producing more than Tobias and making significantly less than the Tobias contract. So he’s not even in the top 10 for worst contracts to me. VanVleet is making $40m+ for the next 3 years.
     
  17. BankTeller

    BankTeller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2021
    Messages:
    2,691
    Likes Received:
    2,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You’re seriously underselling Grant here…

    So GS is going to get Grant for salary dumping an injured vet and a dude they barely even play? I also see Dallas having a hard time giving up a 1st for Thybulle right now when they are playing well. I wouldn’t like this at all.

    If Warriors want Grant, I’d want Kuminga, CP’s salary, AND a future lightly protected 1st, ‘26 for example. We’d be giving him away if we came away with just Kuminga, imo.
     
  18. BankTeller

    BankTeller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2021
    Messages:
    2,691
    Likes Received:
    2,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not in love with that deal honestly. The only reason I’d like this deal is if Cronin has an idea of a valuable vet that he can overpay to be a culture guy for the next couple of seasons. Otherwise, this would just a salary dump move.

    The two 1sts is nice though, and from two teams you’d want 1sts from. Even after all these years of losing, they’ve really only come out with Fox, Murray, and Sabonis (at the expense of trading Hali, still a mistake imo) which still isn’t a core that can really compete imo. Knicks could be a star away from competing, but it has yet to happen still. So a top 10 protected 1st from SAC in ‘26 and a top 10 protected 1st from NYK in ‘25 are fun, but I’d be more interested in seeing if a team is willing to give up their young forward for an immediate upgrade.
     
    RR7 likes this.
  19. BankTeller

    BankTeller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2021
    Messages:
    2,691
    Likes Received:
    2,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think Hield and Brogdon should get both ‘28 and ‘30 1sts from Miami, unprotected. And they might have to do it if they want to keep up with the Bucks and Celtics this season. Philly seriously jumps them too if they can land another star for what they got from the Harden deal.

    I’d love to seriously work it out with the Heat and try to make it fair for both sides. We’ve already created this huge problem in the east by trading Dame to the Bucks, and Cronin has continued to milk that situation perfectly by trading Jrue to the Celtics. The Jrue trade process was very amicable, and we came out with a great deal. Cronin literally has his fingerprints on the hierarchy of the eastern conference, that’s actually kind of crazy.

    The Heat are in the thick of things with Philly and Orlando, who both just look like they have more talent. But I do think that Brogdon and Hield (and maybe other filler) in place of Lowry and/or Robinson would put them in 3rd or 4th in the conference for the next few seasons while Jimmy is still in his competing years.
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2023
    CJ_is_Gone likes this.
  20. CJ_is_Gone

    CJ_is_Gone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2022
    Messages:
    2,157
    Likes Received:
    2,235
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thybulle is not allowed to be traded to Dallas until after July 2024.

    Also, I think you're selling low here. You have an irrational love for Kuminga (so you're overvaluing him).
     

Share This Page