Scoot and Sharpe would have been the worst shooting backcourt in the NBA last season

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by sheed30, Aug 7, 2024.

  1. sheed30

    sheed30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Yea, I'm being a little hard on them, but I said Scoot deserves a pass. Sharpe does have a little questions about him to answer if you ask me. But it should be mentioned, Sharpe does have a laid back mindset. He seems to be one of those guys that will rely on his skills and not actually improving each offseason or the drive too, and that might be put into question down the road. But I'll admit its too early to say that about him, but this is huge year for him, we SHOULD see improvements.

    Scoot seems to have that drive, and seems to be a workaholic so I am not so much as worried about him.

    But that's besides the point, guys here seriously have tunnel vision. The don't even want to admit it's a little worrisome, but yes we have time on our hands and we need to give them room to grow.

    But some are over protective of certain players here while being overcritical of others, and try to push a narrative and we see it every week. If we are going to point out every fault on players here, every single week, then we should do the same with every player on our team.
     
  2. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,792
    Likes Received:
    122,778
    Trophy Points:
    115
    @sheed30 you need to stop with the personal insults. It's a forum. People have different opinions. Getting that upset when someone doesn't agree with you is ridiculous.
     
  3. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,517
    Likes Received:
    16,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Must have read Scoot's numbers wrong. Oh well.

    Sharpe doesn't have any players on the team as good as Dame for other teams to key on. Here's a secret. It's easier to play with Dame on your team than without him. You have more time to get shots off. You have more lanes.

    So anyway, Scoot's shooting improved as the season went on, so I'm good with it.
     
  4. BassPlaya

    BassPlaya Puntificator

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2022
    Messages:
    1,098
    Likes Received:
    1,917
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Shop Owner
    Location:
    3rd Rock
    I'm confused. What is accomplished by displaying any stat, and that includes one that rates the players as "Last" in any category, in following a team?

    Are we suppose to moan?
    Be depressed?
    Get angry?
    Insult other fans who don't agree?

    I like the two players that this thread is about. Am I suppose to change my mind? Would that make some folks happy?
    Is it OK for me to enjoy my team and love where they're going?
     
  5. sheed30

    sheed30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Stop it, I’m voicing my opinion here, nothing else. There is no personal attacks. I’m countering his baseless claims.

    that same dude told me I had a hardon for him lol.
     
  6. sheed30

    sheed30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    93
    What’s the accomplishments of being that are negative 24/7 in here? And push a narrative over and over? It’s the same thing, they are now getting a taste of their own medicine, and everyone is having a fit lol.

    a few here have agreed with me, so it’s not one way traffic nor anything I said isn’t fact.

    I’m also rooting for Sharpe and Scoot as I said. It’s not hate, it’s facts their shooting % is poor.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2024
  7. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,517
    Likes Received:
    16,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'll love where it's going once we commit to a path. I think that's what's going to happen... And I like it.

    But I hope we don't keep straddling two paths.
     
    blazerkor and Everything Beagle like this.
  8. Everything Beagle

    Everything Beagle Local Trans Icon

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2023
    Messages:
    3,380
    Likes Received:
    4,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you're saying they need to play a lot more if we're going to get Flagg?
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  9. Everything Beagle

    Everything Beagle Local Trans Icon

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2023
    Messages:
    3,380
    Likes Received:
    4,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    trader-joe.png

    Trader Joe looking at Scoot and Sharpe
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  10. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    15,620
    Likes Received:
    16,765
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If I'm not mistaken this entire thread is just an extension of your posts in other threads that Scoot and Shae haven't shown enough yet for us to give up on Ant. Is that correct?

    I don't agree with that but I do think it's a reasonable opinion to have.
     
  11. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,356
    Likes Received:
    14,432
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    I don't agree....
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  12. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,517
    Likes Received:
    16,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]
     
    SlyPokerDog and Wizard Mentor like this.
  13. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,698
    Likes Received:
    36,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so true...that kind of outrage should be saved for the in-laws
     
    SlyPokerDog and Phatguysrule like this.
  14. sheed30

    sheed30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    93
    It’s a little bit of both. But I am a little concerned about those two shooting % going forward, and if others can’t admit they are too, then I don’t know what to tell ya.

    I’m all for trading Ant, but it’s needs to make sense. I don’t want us to take a step back. Cronin has to do what he did with the Dame trade, hold out for fair value imo.

    I’m not buying the notion some push here that Ant is the reason for this team’s faults. Ant is not the reason we sucked as a whole team defensively and not the reason we sucked so bad offensively, especially Scoot and Sharpe, and Sharpe only played 13 games with him last year.

    Why are we talking about players faults in here all the damn time while ignoring others?

    Is Ant a good defender? No. But a good team defense can mask a poor defender and we suck as a team as a whole. Big Cling being a rim protector should help us as a whole.

    Scoot hasn’t shown to be a good defender either, and Sharpe has show some flashes but is inconsistent defensively and has games he coasts.

    This was also Ant’s first season as the main guy and the #1 option. He pressed at times, and other times we had such poor players offensively on the floor he was forced to shoulder the load. Same with Grant. There is something called an adjusting period, and Ant will learn from being the main guy this past season Imo.

    If Scoot and Sharpe can improve and take a leap next season, it will take the load off Grant and Ant. Their effectiveness will go up. And they can become even more valuable to trade as the season goes on if we decide to go that route and trade them. Im rooting for them Scoot and Sharpe, don’t get it twisted. But as young players they need to be pushed, especially Sharpe with his laid back mindset that can be a fault at times.

    This forum has a thing where we make certain players scapegoats and then when they get traded or move on, people turn their attention to others.

    Right now it’s Ant mainly as the scapegoat, Grant right there behind him and Billups as the coach. If Ant and Grant are traded I promise you others will find someone else to make a scapegoat. We have seen it time and time again. Stotts was a scapegoat. CJ and Nurk was too. And even Dame at times.

    And I think that shit is toxic.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2024
  15. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,517
    Likes Received:
    16,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nobody cares if we're good at anything right now. There is no scapegoating. This team is supposed to suck.

    Billups is not a good coach. We'll need a better one eventually.

    Ant has proven he's not good enough to build around if you eventually want a contending team. So has Grant. But they are both good enough that a team looking to improve might take a risk on bringing them in. Their best value to us is in the draft capital they can bring back.

    There is no toxicity right now, except for the ISO ball we keep defaulting to and lack of defensive effort. That can be toxic to a developing team.

    You're getting all wrapped around the axle for no reason. I don't think anybody has a dislike for Ant or Grant. Or even Billups. People just don't see them as part of this team's future.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2024
  16. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,272
    Likes Received:
    43,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, I'm going to give one more attempt at having a conversation with you rather than just receiving a hostile argument. Ignoring all the stuff about the forum, just addressing the stuff about the team itself.

    "Fair value" is a completely subjective term. I've addressed this in other threads. A player is worth: A) what other teams are willing to give, or B) what that player will contribute to the team's future goals. Sounds like you're primarily concerned about the second, and again, that's subjective based on one's perception of Ant's future prospects vis-a-vis Scoot/Sharpe. Personally, I don't see him as part of the future, so I really only see his value as being defined by what other teams are willing to give. And personally, I really don't see that value changing over the course of this coming season--but of course that's just opinion and guesswork.

    I will agree with you that Ant is not the reason the team sucked as a whole defensively. However, he individually certainly sucked defensively, and it's hard to project him improving much defensively, as you agree below.

    As for offense, I agree again with you that he did not really impact Scoot/Sharpe's offensive effectiveness--neither hurting nor helping. And really, this is the problem, given that when he starts, he is the primary ball-handler, but his game is really not one that sets the table for his teammates. He is more an is0-player offensively, generally being more interested in calling his own number on offense than others'. Which, I think, is why most project Ant's best role on a team as a 6th-man lethal scorer rather than as a backcourt starter. And honestly, I would love to believe that he would willingly accept that role when/if Scoot surpasses him as starting PG (yes, I believe that Ant will and should start at PG to begin this season), but I don't see him being happy in that role, nor do I believe that the front-office would be satisfied having someone in that role long-term while making starter money. Could he be the next Ginobili, moving into a reserve role in his prime for the good of the team (let's note that he was 29 when that happened)? Possible, but I wouldn't bet on it.

    Nobody thinks that Scoot/Sharpe are yet good defenders, and nobody has claimed that. The general consensus is that Scoot has the body type, athleticism, and mentality to develop into someone who will be effective on that end, and that Sharpe has the height/length to be significantly less of a liability in that regard at the SG spot than Ant is. Yes, it's possible to mask a terrible defender, but it's certainly preferable not to have to. And despite your previous excoriation of defensive metrics, league history has plenty of examples of players who were ineffective defensively at age 19 who grew into effective defenders by the time they reached their prime. It's not unreasonable to believe that Scoot/Sharpe can do the same.

    This is obviously speculative, as is admittedly everybody's presumption of improvement from Scoot/Sharpe. But again, it's much more reasonable, likely, and historically supportable to expect significant improvement from guys who have yet to play an NBA game past age 20.5 than it is from a guy who's been in the league 6 years already. Is there some room for improvement for Ant? Sure. But it's hard to dispute that he's much more likely to be near his peak level of performance.

    So--and please correct/clarify if I'm wrong here--it sounds like you're acknowledging that Ant's primary value to the team is not as a building block for the future, but as a piece to
    1. aid in the development in the guys Cronin has specifically identified as the future of the franchise, and
    2. be dealt for assets that will actually be part of the team's future.
    If that is in fact your position, then I think we are all in agreement here.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2024
    BIG Q, sheed30 and Phatguysrule like this.
  17. sheed30

    sheed30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    93
    But has Sharpe and Scoot shown yet we can build around them?

    I mean, is there any reason to dump Ant right now? The only thing you can say, is trading Ant to give Scoot the keys to the team. That's the only thing I agree with. But not at the expense of just trading Ant and not getting fair value back.. Value for Ant is what others disagree on too, so we can agree to disagree on what value is for him.

    But what if Sharpe's shooting stats are the same next season? Will you get a little concerned then? I know Scoot is a workaholic. I think dude has the grit, heart, and drive to keep improving each off season. Sharpe I'm not so sold on yet.

    What is Sharpe doesn't turn out to be a cornerstone for us, but rather a good piece on a team, like Ant is right now?
     
  18. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,272
    Likes Received:
    43,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Certainly nothing is guaranteed. We only know that Cronin has made it clear that he is building the team around them.

    "Dump"? No. Trade for a package that includes a couple pieces that project as part of the future, even if it seems to be less than he theoretically should be worth? Sure.

    Sure. And if one of the guys that the FO has identified as the future of the team isn't going to be up to the task, it would be better to know sooner than later.
     
    BIG Q and sheed30 like this.
  19. sheed30

    sheed30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I am sure how to break down each statement like you did lol, so I'll just address it in points.

    1. Yes, we can have different opinions on what value is for Ant. Some want to trade him for draft capital, which to in itself is risky imo because we cant predict what pick or who we will pick from this far out, and it could be just trading Ant basically for nothing in the end. I want value back for him, right now, that potentially help and build with Scoot and Sharpe. Yes, there is a risk Ant value doesn't go up and we end of getting less value for him, but I rather risk that then trading him for draft capital, which it itself is also risky imo.

    2. I agree Ant is best suited at the 2, and play some spot mins at the PG spot when Scoot is resting. Who else do we have at the backup PG spot? That will also give Scoot more keys to the team as the starting PG. So Sharpe will be the one more effected. But Sharpe is fine coming off the bench, he still has to prove himself in certain aspects, and the guy can still get tons of mins on this team. IF, Sharpe really takes a leap next season, then yes that more likely means we will get rid of Ant shortly after. But there is no rush imo. let Sharpe show us some improvements next season first imo.

    3. Well, some do think Scoot and Sharpe are good defenders if you have seen some of the responses. Sharpe is probably the best out of the 3 imo. But he coasts at time, offensively too. Billups has had to light a fire under his ass a few times. and to me, defense comes down to mainly hustle, grit, pride and heart. Scoot seems to have that, as I said I'm not as much worried about Scoot and dude is playing the PG spot at young age which is hard to do. Sharpe, needs to be more consistent and I would rather have a gritty passionate guy on my guy that someone laid back like Sharpe imo. We need gritty dogs on our team, Sharpe clearly isn't a dog lol.

    4. Yes, I have stated it's too early to pin point those things on Sharpe and Scoot, they still need more time. So, why I said its big year for both coming up so show us improvements, and more so Sharpe since he regressed in his shooting % by a wide margin. Some want to claim he was hurt, but his numbers in the month of November when he wasn't hurt mirrored his overall shooting stats for the year, so it's mainly on him to improve in that area.

    5. The last part, yes I'm leaning towards Ant being a piece more than a cornerstone. But he still has a small window to show us that, as being 25, his first season as the guy on a team that was quite poor offensively., I'm not ready to wave the towel and dump him for draft capital. He should learn from last season to pick his spots better now, be more mature, etc. How about let Scoot and Sharpe show us a leap in improvements first before we trade him? I don't think that is asking much. Scoot and Sharpe can also turn out to be a 'piece' on a good team and not cornerstones either. More times than not sadly, players turn out to be a piece and not a cornerstone when it's all said and done.

    and last part, yes I'm rough around the edges and generally a intense person in anything I do or discuss lol, so I know how that can come across at times. But don't take anything I said personally, I'm not trying to attack people either. all in good discissions. I don't mind people firing back at me, all in good laughs my man.
     
  20. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,517
    Likes Received:
    16,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This isn't choosing Scoot and Sharpe over Ant. It's saying Ant isn't what we need (he's the wrong kind of player to keep if you're doing this reset) and we need to keep looking until we find that.

    If Scoot or Sharpe wind up not being good enough then we'll move off of them as well. We haven't had enough time that I'm ready to move off of them.

    There isn't much room for growth with Ant. We've already seen him for long enough to know that he isn't going to be a top piece to a championship team. You don't start building with your bench. You start building through the draft. You fill in the bench later. It'll be easier then, because better players will be willing to accept a lesser role for the opportunity at a championship.

    Right now is just not the time for Ant in Portland. We'd be better off trying again with another pick.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2024
    Quatro44 and BIG Q like this.

Share This Page