<div align="center">layoutz vs. jhill55Round 2Theme: Brandon Merriweather - S - Miami (FL)Must use the Following Pic: (#19)Due Date: Sunday, September 24th at 9 PM EST.PM your Signature to CombsSignature Rules:</div>- All Signatures Can Not Exceed 468 (W) x 125 (H) Pixels. It may be smaller then that size, but not larger.- The Signature must fit the given theme for that particular round.- All Signatures must contain "NFLCentral" somewhere on it. Also acceptable are "NFLC" or "NFLCentral.net"
Sig A: Very clean feeling. Flows very well. The text is meh and I love the creativity. Simple but effective. I would have liked miami colors though. Sig B: Too grungy and dirty looking. The text doesnt seem to fit and the coloring could be better. My vote goes to sig A.
I give up. I am absolutely jinxed in tourneys. Layoutz even said that he thought he was done. Oh well. Good sig Layoutz. Hope you do good the rest of the way.
WOW Jhill.. I really thought the other sig was yours. Bad showing man.. Definitely not your best work. I am surprised. In my mind you were one of the few that I thought could win the whole thing..
I still really like my sig. I was actually going for a "grungey" look. That pic effect took me about 2 hours to do. But, I swear I'm like A-rod. Great in the regular season, but I have been in about 6 tourneys, and I always lose. Dont know what it is.....
the reason you lost cause you it look like you didnt even bother t do a sig at the last minuteBut i think i won cause of my text and my lightning
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (layoutz @ Sep 25 2006, 08:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>the reason you lost cause you it look like you didnt even bother t do a sig at the last minuteBut i think i won cause of my text and my lightning</div>No offense man but I can never understand what you're saying.. it's completely incoherent.
This sig took me about 4 hours. Lighting? You just put a few white gradients around the pic, and thats about it. The lighting alone on my sig uses about 25 layers, and took about 2 hours. Text? You just slapped text on and set it to soft light or something and cut the last name out of a block. Not very complicated. Mine's not real special either, but yours doesnt exactly blow it out of the water.My style has always been keep it simple on text. If you look at all my stuff, text is never real extravagant. I just hate it when the text overpowers the sig.But, in the end, you won, I lost, and thats it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jhill55 @ Sep 25 2006, 09:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>This sig took me about 4 hours. Lighting? You just put a few white gradients around the pic, and thats about it. The lighting alone on my sig uses about 25 layers, and took about 2 hours. Text? You just slapped text on and set it to soft light or something and cut the last name out of a block. Not very complicated. Mine's not real special either, but yours doesnt exactly blow it out of the water.My style has always been keep it simple on text. If you look at all my stuff, text is never real extravagant. I just hate it when the text overpowers the sig.But, in the end, you won, I lost, and thats it.</div>It's usually quality over quantity in my mind when it comes to graphics. It shouldn't really matter how many layers you used for the lighting or the whole sig for that matter. It either looks good or it doesnt. I think if you had gone for something more smooth rather than grungy you would have won though... Maybe just not your day?
