You guys probably wont like either of these like the rest of my work but oh well, figure I can only get better by "Constructive Criticism". A.orB.
They are both identical except the bgs are a little diff. I don't like either of them--the pic seems too stretched out, and the text is really bad. All I can suggest is to use your eyes and choose some better stuff, and not to distort the main pic that much, he looks like a fat midget or something.I give this an E, failure with effort.
not a bad concept for a sig, but like the others stated already looks kinda squashed, even the logo in the BG. good pic choices though.
Thanks, I think everyone but rockandallstar gave me CONSTRUCTIVE Criticism. But I guess that's what you should come to expect from someone who dislikes you for no apparent reason, doesn't have a lick of gfx experience himself yet finds the time to reply to each and every sig posted with some A**hole remarks.Anyways, thanks guys for the POINTERS instead've just straightup telling me it sucks like SOMEONE.
The pics are a little stretched. And I don't think you need the noise effect in the bg for v1. Takes too much away from the pic. The text could use work, but you're learning, which is good.
I like version one better because you bring out LT in the b/g more. The only suggestion I have is change the text and you should get a solid 9/10 from me.
Uggh sorrytext looks bad and I dont know what that BG is. PIC looks too strecthed too.try using some filters for the background and messing around with it. Maybe some gradients and stuff too.
