Walter Payton

Discussion in 'Graphics Showcase' started by diehard2231, May 22, 2006.

  1. diehard2231

    diehard2231 NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    C+C please[​IMG]v2[​IMG]
     
  2. diehard2231

    diehard2231 NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    OK what's wrong with it,fonts a little weak, thought the rest was pretty good, feedback [​IMG]
     
  3. AdropOFvenom

    AdropOFvenom BBW Member

    Font is weak and maybe its just me but it looks like you stretched out his face. BG isnt bad, kinda simple but effective.
     
  4. diehard2231

    diehard2231 NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ May 25 2006, 10:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Font is weak and maybe its just me but it looks like you stretched out his face. BG isnt bad, kinda simple but effective.</div>yeah I knew about the font,working on a v2, render is what it is,didn't have to scale it. Bg was decent until I faded in the back shot. Thanks for the reply Venom
     
  5. JHair

    JHair NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ May 25 2006, 10:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Font is weak and maybe its just me but it looks like you stretched out his face. BG isnt bad, kinda simple but effective.</div>^^ what he said
     
  6. PurplePeopleEaters

    PurplePeopleEaters NFLC nflcentral.net Graphics Crew

    The render looks really weird. The effect on it is bad too..
     
  7. diehard2231

    diehard2231 NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    added a second version any better [​IMG]
     
  8. Deve09

    Deve09 NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    i don't know what those guys r talking about, both of those sigs r good
     
  9. jordan4pres.

    jordan4pres. BBW Member

    V1 is horrible.. V2 however is great.. you cleaned it up nice.8.5/10
     

Share This Page