c'mon y'all! all that acquisition don't seem to solve our dishing problem

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets' started by grillbar, Aug 28, 2005.

  1. grillbar

    grillbar JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    we added a bunch of scorers, rebounders, and defenders, but no passers! a lot of people say defense is the thang that wins games, or that we need people who can shoot the lights out. But I always thought passing is the essence of the game of basketball, as well as many other sports, like soccer.

    And obviously, we have not addressed this area of need this offseason. At this point, you have a hugely unselfish player in Yao Ming, a bunch of scorers like T Mac, Anderson, and James, great hustlers like Barry and Wesley, and stud rebounders/blockers like Swift and Deke. So, to string all this together, we are in dire need of a stockton, not an Iverson.

    Look at the all the past championship teams, you always had great passers like Magic Johnson and Isaih Thomas, or you have tremedously selfless players who always look to pass the ball FIRST, like Jeff Fisher and John Paxon. Do we have one of these on the team?

    In short, without a PLAYMAKER, we'll be a bunch of awesome individual players, or worse yet, YAO MING will become the playmaker. Damn he's gonna be tired.
     
  2. AznxBaller

    AznxBaller JBB Back...

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,530
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    You've summed up my thoughts here perfectly. I've vouched all a long for a playmaker on this team yet only a few have acceded to this opinion. If we get a pass first guard that can knock down open shots when needed. Getting a Stockton like player can open up the offense for us and make it run much more smoothly. However, these types of players don't exactly grow on trees so it would be hard getting one. With that said, I think you're overexaggerating a bit here. Last year, the playmakers we had were Sura and McGrady. However, with the addition of Andersen, who can play point guard duties, we now have three. That really isn't too bad for the team so I think we can cope with it for now. Besides, wait for the season to start to see if we really need one, there's plenty of teams that succeed without a playmaker.
     
  3. TmacGarnett

    TmacGarnett JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,534
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    If you didn't notice that in the playoffs tmac was driving in the lane and when the triple team coverage collapsed on him, he dished it to yao. Even tho yao dropped it many times, Tmac still dished it to him. I agree in the fact that we need a passer. Im also pretty confident that one more trade will happen sending 2 gaurds for either a back up SF or a PG.

    btw im new [​IMG]
     
  4. ROCK4LIFE

    ROCK4LIFE Active Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,110
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Miami, Detroit, and San Antonio..............3 of the best teams in the league with NO PURE point guard. If you haven't noticed, the league has changed in the last couple years. The John Stockton era is officially DEAD. We can go and get a so called "pure point guard" and watch Tony Parker, Chauncy Billups, or Dwayne Wade score 30 on them. I don't think a pure point is neccesary. If Detroit can win with they're guards, then so can we. What we need is a guard that can set up the offense, and hit open jumpers. That's it.
     
  5. The Dream

    The Dream mama there goes that man!

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    4,456
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I kinda agree with Rock4Life......it would be nice to have a pure PG, but I think we can definitely work with what we got right now....hell the Lakers won 3 straight titles with Derek Fisher handling most of the PG duties.
     
  6. DynastYWarrioR6

    DynastYWarrioR6 JBB SmurfY

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,091
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    I think if we had a "decent" passing PG, but whose a STUD on defense that would be great....I mean I don't think we need a super duper passing PG I think if we shut down opposing guards from driving into the lane people wouldn't score so much on us on the drive and dish also by having quick guards drawing fouls on Yao and our big men...
    [​IMG]
     
  7. TmacGarnett

    TmacGarnett JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,534
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Can anyone name any PG's we can get via trade or signing? so we can all check out the possibilities

    Only one comes to my mind:
    rafer alston
     
  8. DynastYWarrioR6

    DynastYWarrioR6 JBB SmurfY

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,091
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Earl Watson....one of the many young PG's in Boston (ie Marcus Banks) i like Bank btw...good defender [​IMG]
     
  9. AznxBaller

    AznxBaller JBB Back...

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,530
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Welcome to the forum TmacGarnett! You'll find it to be one of the finest of JBB.
    <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Can anyone name any PG's we can get via trade or signing? so we can all check out the possibilities</div>
    There's a lot. Watson, Banks, and Alston like the guys said above. Plus any point guard on a team looking to relieve cap space really like New Orleans with Speedy Claxton.
     
  10. houston_owns_u

    houston_owns_u JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    374
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I believe Damon Jones is still availiable, though I once thought he was going to the Cavaliers...anyhow, Damon Jones can dish, drain the 3, and add more youth to the team. I admit that it would kinda be crowded in Clutch City, but it could be worth a try. How about getting rid of Wesley for Damon somehow...that would be awesome. [​IMG]
     
  11. Trip

    Trip 2000000000000000000000000

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,773
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    London/Mississauga, ON
    Damon Jones is a weak defender and just a one-dimensional shooter. He is a shooting guard in a point guard's body and I'd really be irky about giving up an expiring contract and possible starter in Wesley for Jones whose value only elevated because he was on a winning team last year.

    I don't think getting a pure point guard is a necessity. As Rock4life has mentioned, the top teams in the league (Detroit, San Antonio, Miami) do not have passing point guards, yet they are the teams that are believed to have a chance of winning the championship. The days of the pure point guard are over. The only playmakers that I can think of off the top of my head are Steve Nash, Brevin Knight and Jason Kidd. It's just becoming rarer and rarer that you'll find a pure point guard so easily. Until we falter during the season because of the lack of a playmaker, I wouldn't be criticizing the team's moves so early.
     
  12. TmacGarnett

    TmacGarnett JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,534
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    thxs aznxballer

    I would love a S&T for watson but i doubt memphis would want to help us.
    A S&T with miami for damon jones is possible but we dont have anything to offer them that they dont allready have except draft picks.

    a trade for alston is possible but very unlikely
     
  13. Adrenaline

    Adrenaline JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I'm content with what we have now. Lets go with this..and if trades need to go down, they will. As for a passer, sorry to ruin your party..but, Sura..and Barry man.
     
  14. TmacGarnett

    TmacGarnett JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,534
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    i agree i dont think we lack in any position

    tmac,james,yao,anderson will provide offense

    swift,barry,wesley will provide defense

    im just worried about the surplus of gaurds we have. I would be happy sending 1 away for a 2nd rounder
     
  15. Adrenaline

    Adrenaline JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Don't worry about us not trading one. It will happen. Just telling you the truth.
     
  16. KfrumHTOWN!

    KfrumHTOWN! JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    a passer would be a plus but not needed. The only passer we really need is tmac when he gets doubled. I think that our offense should revolve around tmac. OUr point guard should just bring it up the floor and pass to tmac. Then tmac can do what he does best...create. honestly i can't think of anyone in the league that can handle this situation better than him. who needs a point guard when you already have the best point-forward?!?!
     
  17. grillbar

    grillbar JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Rock4life:</div><div class="quote_post">Miami, Detroit, and San Antonio..............3 of the best teams in the league with NO PURE point guard. If you haven't noticed, the league has changed in the last couple years. The John Stockton era is officially DEAD. We can go and get a so called "pure point guard" and watch Tony Parker, Chauncy Billups, or Dwayne Wade score 30 on them. I don't think a pure point is neccesary. If Detroit can win with they're guards, then so can we. What we need is a guard that can set up the offense, and hit open jumpers. That's it.</div>

    I don't believe I mentioned the words PG anywhere in my discussion. All I said was we need a passer or a playmaker. This guy doesn't have to take the point, he could be the 2, 3, 4, or 5, but he has to control the flow of the game, which means spreading the ball around and getting it to the right person at the right time. This has to be his mentality first and foremost, NOT DASHING OR SCORING.
    Look at San Antonio, Manu, Parker, Mohammed, Duncan, Horry, Bowen, all are incredibly unselfish players, even Detroit has a ton of them. The playmakers on those teams are Parker, Manu, and Billups, eventhough they're awesome individual scorers, they are all looking to pass first, I don't believe we have these type of guys right now. John Barry and Yao Ming are the most unselfish players on the team, but they're Not Playmakers! And forgive me for being so blunt, T-Mac looks to pass only as a last resort or when he thinks he can make a highlight reel dishing. James and Sura? These guys looked like they played power forwards in highschool, cuz they love to bury their head and ram into the crowd.
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting KfrumHTOWN!:</div><div class="quote_post">a passer would be a plus but not needed. The only passer we really need is tmac when he gets doubled. I think that our offense should revolve around tmac. OUr point guard should just bring it up the floor and pass to tmac. Then tmac can do what he does best...create. honestly i can't think of anyone in the league that can handle this situation better than him. who needs a point guard when you already have the best point-forward?!?!</div>

    <strike>man, u crazy!</strike> give me a championship team that didn't have at least one awsome passer on the team, even that lakers team, jeff fisher was way underated as a playmaker. Face it, without a great passer, the Rockets ain't going anywhere in the playoffs no matter who they add. You can mark my words
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Trip:</div><div class="quote_post">the top teams in the league (Detroit, San Antonio, Miami) do not have passing point guards</div>

    What? Do you watch any NBA games? You better rewind the 2005 NBA Finals tape! Billus, Parker, Ginobili, do these names ring any bells? They are not just awesome passing guards, they're PLAYMAKERS!!!

    <font color="red">Personal attacks will not be tolerated. Also, use the 'edit' function if you have something you want to add to a post.~Trip</font>
     
  18. grillbar

    grillbar JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting KfrumHTOWN!:</div><div class="quote_post">a passer would be a plus but not needed. The only passer we really need is tmac when he gets doubled. I think that our offense should revolve around tmac. OUr point guard should just bring it up the floor and pass to tmac. Then tmac can do what he does best...create. honestly i can't think of anyone in the league that can handle this situation better than him. who needs a point guard when you already have the best point-forward?!?!</div>

    man, u crazy! give me a championship team that didn't have at least one awsome passer on the team, even that lakers team, jeff fisher was way underated as a playmaker. Face it, without a great passer, the Rockets ain't going anywhere in the playoffs no matter who they add. You can mark my words
     
  19. grillbar

    grillbar JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Trip:</div><div class="quote_post">the top teams in the league (Detroit, San Antonio, Miami) do not have passing point guards</div>

    What? Do you watch any NBA games? You better rewind the 2005 NBA Finals tape! Billus, Parker, Ginobili, do these names ring any bells? They are not just awesome passing guards, they're PLAYMAKERS!!!
     
  20. Run BJM

    Run BJM Heavy lies the crown. Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,749
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I agree with Rock4Life on this one, in this era a passing PG isnt necessary. Teams who have had success recently; LAL of a few years back, SAC of a few years back, SA, DET, MIA, all of these teams ave good passers at all positions rather than one great passer and play good team defense. Right now the Rox are in this mold in which most players are good passers, Swift is he only player I would say isnt a good passer for his position but all of the starters are solid defenders.

    As for possible candidates for the starting position via trade or FA, off the top of my head I would say Speedy Claxton, Earl Watson, Brevin Knight, Marcus Banks, Mo Williams. I dont think any of these guys would be a real improvement over Sura though...
     

Share This Page