<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bleedblk&gld)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (favre4mvp)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (1toNothing)</div><div class='quotemain'> I wouldn't piss bleed off</div> Why? He might make another piece of crap rank sheet for us?</div> Somebody's a little upset their Green Bay Packers aren't looking so hot on my rankings. Hey ask Porky for his rankings, the Packers are like 10-6 or some nonsense like that. I'll be more right about my predictions then anyone else on this forum. oh yeah, blow me nubee</div> tough guy . Dude you rate the Saints way to high everyone knows that. It was probably wrong for him to rip you for making the picks but that last sentence was a lil out of line for something as stupid as predictions.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bleedblk&gld)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (favre4mvp)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (1toNothing)</div><div class='quotemain'> I wouldn't piss bleed off</div> Why? He might make another piece of crap rank sheet for us?</div> Somebody's a little upset their Green Bay Packers aren't looking so hot on my rankings. Hey ask Porky for his rankings, the Packers are like 10-6 or some nonsense like that. I'll be more right about my predictions then anyone else on this forum. oh yeah, blow me nubee</div> I dont give a crap that the Packers are low on your stupid rankings. I could make a piece of crap list like yours, doesnt mean its gonna be right.
Easy boys...its just rankings. If you don't like the rankings, how about we discuss why the rankings suck...not how bleed sucks.
Well, for one he has the Packers at 5-11, Favre has never had a losing season, and they are not going to be tied for last in the NFC with the 49ers. Also, the Saints will not go to the playoffs, let alone the SB. And the Rams at 7-9, I dont think so. One more, (altough I could keep going) Culpepper will not put up those kind of numbers, a 109.5 rating w/o Moss? hahaha...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Culpepper will not put up those kind of numbers, a 109.5 rating w/o Moss? hahaha...</div> I wouldn't bet the farm on that one. Culpepper has great numbers, regardless of whether Moss plays or not. I believe Moss missed five or six games last year and played hurt for at least another three. Despite that, Daunte did the following: 110.9 QB Rating 39 TDs (13 were to Moss) 11 Picks 4717 Yds Passing (747 to Moss) 69.2 Completion Percentage Don't get me wrong, as a Packers fan I can't STAND Culpepper...but those numbers aren't out of line at all for this year. With Burleson, Taylor, Robinson, Williamson, Wiggins and Bennett...that's a lot of targets not named "Moss."
I have to agree with Pack Attack on this one. It's really impressive that nearly 4,000 of Culpepper's passing yards went to other WRs than Moss. I'm interested in seeing how being free from Moss will help the Vikings overall team chemistry. Perhaps the Vikings will be more focused this year. I do think Culpepper will be fine without Moss.
Culpepper has looked Rock Solid in Preseason but I think there has to be a small drop off...which means 3,700-4,100 yards and 30-35 TD's ..LOL
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (1toNothing)</div><div class='quotemain'>waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh</div> 1toNothing and Bleed are either friends or the same person. Are you???
Culpepper is still gonna have a solid season. I don't expect as many TD's but he's still gonna be solid. If I had to choose a QB to build a team around right now I think I'd pick Culpepper over Manning.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (1toNothing)</div><div class='quotemain'>waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh</div> 1toNothing and Bleed are either friends or the same person. Are you???</div> He's a friend of mine. waaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh is a New Orleans thing.
