Can anyone argue with me that on this seasons form, Larry Fitz and Anquan Boldin are the best Wide Receiving duo in the NFL. I'm just looking at their stats and they both have 36 catches for 504 and 543 yards and 3 and 2 tds respectivaley. They are both set to break 1200. And this is while they are losing?
At the beginning of the year, I thought it would be Moss and Porter, but Porter's dropped off the face of the Earth.
Colts are overrated. Harrison is great but Manning helped make Wayne and Stokely. Neither will come close to last seasons numbers.
But on this season's form, The rams are pretty high powered in their offensive approach. I think Larry Fitz will have a breakout year and pass out Boldin in most stats categories!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'>Colts are overrated. Harrison is great but Manning helped make Wayne and Stokely. Neither will come close to last seasons numbers.</div> I disagree. Stokley had success in Baltimore. And Wayne was a high draft pick from the U. If anything Wayne has surpassed Harrison for the top spot.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'>Colts are overrated. Harrison is great but Manning helped make Wayne and Stokely. Neither will come close to last seasons numbers.</div> Look at harrisons number post and pre-manning . . . if you are going to say he made wayne(which cant really be proven since he has played with one QB) then he definately made harrison, since numbers bear it out. Same with stokley
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'>Colts are overrated. Harrison is great but Manning helped make Wayne and Stokely. Neither will come close to last seasons numbers.</div> Look at harrisons number post and pre-manning . . . if you are going to say he made wayne(which cant really be proven since he has played with one QB) then he definately made harrison, since numbers bear it out. Same with stokley</div> The question was DUO. Not TRIO. I'll take Fitzgerald and Boldin over Harrison and Wayne. Wayne has been a dissapointment this season. Stokely a major dissapointment who really wasn't nothing in Baltimore anyways. Boldin and Fitz are much younger. If I am building a franchise I'll take the Cardinals duo.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'>Colts are overrated. Harrison is great but Manning helped make Wayne and Stokely. Neither will come close to last seasons numbers.</div> Look at harrisons number post and pre-manning . . . if you are going to say he made wayne(which cant really be proven since he has played with one QB) then he definately made harrison, since numbers bear it out. Same with stokley</div> The question was DUO. Not TRIO. I'll take Fitzgerald and Boldin over Harrison and Wayne. Wayne has been a dissapointment this season. Stokely a major dissapointment who really wasn't nothing in Baltimore anyways. Boldin and Fitz are much younger. If I am building a franchise I'll take the Cardinals duo.</div> I read question, i looked at your erroneous statement that manning made wayne, and made a reply. It was off subject but so was your statement, if you wish to restate your comment fine, but this response has nothing to do with 2 previous posts. Finally i didnt state wayne/harrison was better.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'> Look at harrisons number post and pre-manning . . . if you are going to say he made wayne(which cant really be proven since he has played with one QB) then he definately made harrison, since numbers bear it out. Same with stokley</div> The question was DUO. Not TRIO. I'll take Fitzgerald and Boldin over Harrison and Wayne. Wayne has been a dissapointment this season. Stokely a major dissapointment who really wasn't nothing in Baltimore anyways. Boldin and Fitz are much younger. If I am building a franchise I'll take the Cardinals duo.</div> I read question, i looked at your erroneous statement that manning made wayne, and made a reply. It was off subject but so was your statement, if you wish to restate your comment fine, but this response has nothing to do with 2 previous posts. Finally i didnt state wayne/harrison was better.</div> By farther answering my statement makes this post go farther off topic. I simply gave my opinion and answer. You simply tried to bring it down. Maybe it went a little off topic but if your so much against going off topic. Not saying your not, then why responed to my post. Why not answer the orginal question. If you don't want to answer the orginal question then why post. For the sake of posting?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'> The question was DUO. Not TRIO. I'll take Fitzgerald and Boldin over Harrison and Wayne. Wayne has been a dissapointment this season. Stokely a major dissapointment who really wasn't nothing in Baltimore anyways. Boldin and Fitz are much younger. If I am building a franchise I'll take the Cardinals duo.</div> I read question, i looked at your erroneous statement that manning made wayne, and made a reply. It was off subject but so was your statement, if you wish to restate your comment fine, but this response has nothing to do with 2 previous posts. Finally i didnt state wayne/harrison was better.</div> By farther answering my statement makes this post go farther off topic. I simply gave my opinion and answer. You simply tried to bring it down. Maybe it went a little off topic but if your so much against going off topic. Not saying your not, then why responed to my post. Why not answer the orginal question. If you don't want to answer the orginal question then why post. For the sake of posting?</div> Nice instead of responding to the harrison/wayne made by manning comments again, you decide to just delve into a pointless rants about off subject posts. First i said i posted off subject. I didnt say there was anything wrong with that. I just wanted you to justify your manning made wayne, but not harrison comment.
Wayne and Harrison combined for 163 receptions 2323 yards and 27 TDs. Fitzgerald and Boldin combined for 114 receptions 1403 and 9 TDs. So Harrison and Wayne had 49 more receptions, 920 more yards and 18 more TDs than Boldin and Fitzgerald. I think that is a big difference
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'> I read question, i looked at your erroneous statement that manning made wayne, and made a reply. It was off subject but so was your statement, if you wish to restate your comment fine, but this response has nothing to do with 2 previous posts. Finally i didnt state wayne/harrison was better.</div> By farther answering my statement makes this post go farther off topic. I simply gave my opinion and answer. You simply tried to bring it down. Maybe it went a little off topic but if your so much against going off topic. Not saying your not, then why responed to my post. Why not answer the orginal question. If you don't want to answer the orginal question then why post. For the sake of posting?</div> Nice instead of responding to the harrison/wayne made by manning comments again, you decide to just delve into a pointless rants about off subject posts. First i said i posted off subject. I didnt say there was anything wrong with that. I just wanted you to justify your manning made wayne, but not harrison comment.</div> No I was just calling you out for saying that your statement doesn't have to do with the previous statements. Then why post? Just kind of confusing. Why not answer the question. I mean aren't you suppossed to post something about it or was it a chance for you to go after a Packer fan. ahhhhh forget it. To answer your question which I thought was obvious. Wayne and Stokely were never really solid WR's until last season. The season where Manning went crazy throwing the ball. Harrison has been a solid WR for years now. In fact he holds the record for most catches in a a season. Wayne and Stokely have had 1 good year. Besides you can make an argument that every great QB made a WR. With the exception of Jerry Rice. Fitz and Boldin not only are younger and putting up solid #'s. They don't play with an elite caliber QB. I'll take them two with any QB I could have anyday rather than Harrison and Wayne even though I think Harrison is better than both of them. Wayne is overrated!
