<div align="center">Game Info: 8:30 pm EDT Sat Apr 8, 2006 TV: WPSG, WGN @ <div align="center"><font color="darkred">76ers</div></font> <div align="center"> Probable Starters <font size="1">(PG Allen Iverson, SG Andre Iguodala, SF Kyle Korver, PF Chris Webber, C Samuel Dalembert)</font> _________________________________________ <font color="red">Bulls</div></font> <div align="center">Probable Starters <font size="1">(PG Kirk Hinrich, SG Ben Gordon SF Andres Nocioni, PF Malik Allen, C Tyson Chandler)</font></div> <font color=""DarkRed"">Sixers:</font> <font color=""darkred"">Allen Iverson:</font> It is obvious that if we want to win, which I'm not sure if we do, that AI must have a big game. If AI scores less 35 points, the Bulls will win. I guarantee it. <font color=""darkred"">Play Hard:</font> The Sixers have shown many times this season that they don't really care at all. The only players IMO that have played hard every game is AI and Shav Randolf. I guess you can throw Webber in the mix. If the Sixers do want to make the playoffs, all their players must play their best. <font color=""darkred"">Defense:</font> Where to start? The Sixers are a horrible defensive team. They cant defend, rebound, or guard the opposing team. Defense wins championships, defense also wins game. So if the Sixers want to win, they better play D. <font color=""darkred"">Hmmmm...........Lets see, Sixers loose 110-92.</font></div>
i dont know why i made this at all, seeing how horrible the sixers are. i dont care whether or not they make the playoffs or the lottery. but i was just bored, so i thought, why not?
The tandem of Hunter and Dalembert is causing a huge mismatch for the Bulls. The 76ers are dominating, and look to be well on there way to winning this game.
Well i am real that we might hold on u know how the 76ers are but great play out of our team and hopefully this can turn into something big. I wanna know <font color=""Red"">if we didnt have chris webber and samuel and hunter was staring early do u think this could have been a good frontcourt for our team as far as rebounding, blocking, and defense?</font>
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting lil nba:</div><div class="quote_post"><font color=""Red"">if we didnt have chris webber and samuel and hunter was staring early do u think this could have been a good frontcourt for our team as far as rebounding, blocking, and defense?</font></div> ummm........i dont think webber started. i dont think hes played at all this game according to yahoos boxscores
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting phiLA:</div><div class="quote_post">ummm........i dont think webber started. i dont think hes played at all this game according to yahoos boxscores</div> Know i was talking about at the first beginning of the season.
Webber sat out of the game after he strained his back during warm-ups. Watching this game, it really goes to show you how poor Webber is defensively. Our rotations without him were crisp, and we contested pretty much every shot they took. On the offensive end, we shared the ball more than we normally would, and although AI dropped 39 points, the rest of the guys touched the ball more than they would have if Webber was playing. I know you can't base anything off of one game, but it just makes you wonder...
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting BigMo763:</div><div class="quote_post">Webber sat out of the game after he strained his back during warm-ups. Watching this game, it really goes to show you how poor Webber is defensively. Our rotations without him were crisp, and we contested pretty much every shot they took. On the offensive end, we shared the ball more than we normally would, and although AI dropped 39 points, the rest of the guys touched the ball more than they would have if Webber was playing. I know you can't base anything off of one game, but it just makes you wonder...</div> Webber actually got hurt in the Boston game, and he just decided to play it safe and not play. The 76ers were solid, but I think a lot of this win was on the Bulls. They had tons of open shots on the perimeter and they were just missing them. They were also just settling for jumpers as well. But I do give our guys credit for holding them to just 75 points. I know what your thinking Webber was out and we played so much better. Which is true, but it may be just a coinsidence. I remember when AI sprained his ankle against Orlando, and then we won a game aginast the Knicks and Orlando without AI, in which they looked good and shared the ball a lot as well.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting B-22:</div><div class="quote_post">I know what your thinking Webber was out and we played so much better. Which is true, but it may be just a coinsidence. I remember when AI sprained his ankle against Orlando, and then we won a game aginast the Knicks and Orlando without AI, in which they looked good and shared the ball a lot as well.</div> And that is when the trade AI bandwagon started heating up even more... so it's only fair to do the same with Webber isn't it?
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting BigMo763:</div><div class="quote_post">And that is when the trade AI bandwagon started heating up even more... so it's only fair to do the same with Webber isn't it? </div> yeah, but there wouldnt be very much suitors for webber, so there wouldnt be a point. the only team i can really think of right now that may want to go after him is the new york knicks.
I'm not saying we should trade him or that we will, I'm just saying look how well we played without him.
