Dallas and spurs came down to the wire. Do you think spurs would have easily beaten the mavs if they had more rest? or do you think that dallas had to much rest? I think if spurs had more rest they would have had a bigger lead.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting TimmyDMVP:</div><div class="quote_post">Dallas and spurs came down to the wire. Do you think spurs would have easily beaten the mavs if they had more rest? or do you think that dallas had to much rest? I think if spurs had more rest they would have had a bigger lead.</div> Yeah, I think the we got screwed. We had to play 36 hours after eliminating a tough Sacramento team but we still prevailed.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Duncan21:</div><div class="quote_post">Yeah, I think the we got screwed. We had to play 36 hours after eliminating a tough Sacramento team but we still prevailed.</div> You can't say that you got screwed. The Mavericks just took care of business of the much higher seed Memphis. The Spurs could have beaten the Kings earlier.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting TimmyDMVP:</div><div class="quote_post">If spurs got memphis we could of done the same thing to them</div> Are you serious? You got the #1 seed and played the #8 seed, Dallas got screwed getting the #4 seed despite having the 2nd best record in the West and they had to play Memphis who were tied for 7th best record in the league, not the 8th best in their conference. Memphis had won 5 straight and 8 out of 10 entering the playoffs, so they were hot. Memphis was a much harder team to play then Sacramento and the Mavs took care of business better than the Spurs did.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting GatorsowntheSEC:</div><div class="quote_post">Are you serious? You got the #1 seed and played the #8 seed, Dallas got screwed getting the #4 seed despite having the 2nd best record in the West and they had to play Memphis who were tied for 7th best record in the league, not the 8th best in their conference. Memphis had won 5 straight and 8 out of 10 entering the playoffs, so they were hot. Memphis was a much harder team to play then Sacramento and the Mavs took care of business better than the Spurs did.</div> Sacramento if they started the season strong would have been a higher seed the fact that artest and wells are the main reason we had trouble with them. Who stepped up for the grizzlies?
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting TimmyDMVP:</div><div class="quote_post">Sacramento if they started the season strong would have been a higher seed the fact that artest and wells are the main reason we had trouble with them. Who stepped up for the grizzlies?</div> No one other than Pau, but that was because the Mavs took them out of their game. It's ridiculous to say that the Spurs had a harder path than the Mavs when the Spurs were the 1 seed and the Mavs were the 4th seed. Dallas and San Antonio both match up very well against the Grizzlies, but that doesn't mean that the Grizzlies are a bad team.
