Samuel Dalembert is Definite to Be Relocated

Discussion in 'Philadelphia 76ers' started by shankyoass, Jun 11, 2006.

  1. shankyoass

    shankyoass Ceci n'est pas une pipe.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Meanwhile, Samuel Dalembert is definite to be relocated. Despite a fairly prohibitive contract, numerous teams continue to find the 7-footer appealing. </div>

    Source
     
  2. VinsanityVC15

    VinsanityVC15 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    He has the talent but he isnt worth his contract. hes been out of shape since getting injured and just doesnt fit in with the sixers.
     
  3. Super_Sixer_Fan

    Super_Sixer_Fan JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Those are not the reasons we are shipping out Dalembert. He is a cancer to the lockerroom and inconsistant. While Injuries were so-so he was regularly healthy throughout the year. Everyone was, which makes me wonder, how could we have this losing season? I predicted 54 wins. Of course=Mo blew with that **** on both ends of the floor.
     
  4. Apollo

    Apollo JBB Into The Fire

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,874
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    ^Cancer on the team? I dunno about that. But I agree with the word you said, inconsistant. Ya know at first I didn`t wanna trade Sammy because I thought he just had an off season and he`ll regroup. But there is no time to regroup. We have to get players that will play consistant basketball.
     
  5. Midnight Green

    Midnight Green NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,487
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I’m all for trading Sammy, but it has nothing to do with his play, to me it’s more about his contract. Although, his play has been inconsistent, and his instincts for the ball are non existent. You have to remember he did not take up basketball until high school so he is still a very raw talent. I honestly blame the organization more than Sammy for his inconsistent play, and knack for picking up goal tending penalties. The 76ers are willing to invest 60 million in a player, but not willing to spend a couple thousand dollars to hire a big man coach?
     
  6. Courtking

    Courtking Courtking

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,561
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm not 100% sold on this either. You just don't trade away 7 feet athletic centers these days with boat loads of potential. I'd pull the trigger for the right deal but at this point I don't think you can just dump him off for salary purposes.

    Change is good though, being the crap we saw last year.
     
  7. Super_Sixer_Fan

    Super_Sixer_Fan JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    And in order to do that, we have to blow it up. And in order to succesfully blow it up. We've got to figure out: A: How are we going to get the pieces in, to win a championship eventually B: What Style are we GOING to play. King, this doesn't mean bulid a team to beat one particular team. Pat Riley Beat Detroit, he's getting his ass kicked by the Mavericks. And C: How Long do we want it to take? It's easy to say it'll be a couple of years, before we get back at the top. But there are some real talented Gm's, that do it under 2 to 3 years. We've got the passion and pride in our team's to have an opinion on what we want in Philadelphia. The Question is: Is King commited to Philadelphia? Or does he just want to keep his job. To those who think this is a make-or-break off-season for King is a Joke. Remember Pat Clarke is lasting for 3+ decades.
     

Share This Page