I hope the bears try to pick him up. I dont think he had real shot in dallas, cuz parcells already had his guys in place
a lot of teams could use him hes a good #2 or #3 WR he cant really be depended on though remember his seasons with Buffalo with Moulds supporting him
Eh, just a WR getting thrown from team to team. He'll most likely retire soon -- a WR is the most physically demanding position in football and the average NFL player plays about 3.4 years. Even if they (the bears) get him, it'll be like Jerry Rice and the Seahawks except with much less national attention.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Hawk)</div><div class='quotemain'>Eh, just a WR getting thrown from team to team. He'll most likely retire soon -- a WR is the most physically demanding position in football and the average NFL player plays about 3.4 years. Even if they (the bears) get him, it'll be like Jerry Rice and the Seahawks except with much less national attention.</div> Are you kidding me? The WR is not the most physically demanding position in football. Price is still really young and he'll get a chance on a squad somewheres but WR is not the most physically demanding position in football.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ranman)</div><div class='quotemain'>If he couldn't get anything done with Vick what makes you think he can get anything done with Orton?</div> Cause Orton can throw the football
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheBeef)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ranman)</div><div class='quotemain'>If he couldn't get anything done with Vick what makes you think he can get anything done with Orton?</div> Cause Orton can throw the football</div> He's not any better of a QB than Vick.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ranman)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheBeef)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ranman)</div><div class='quotemain'>If he couldn't get anything done with Vick what makes you think he can get anything done with Orton?</div> Cause Orton can throw the football</div> He's not any better of a QB than Vick.</div> He's not a better RB than vick
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Hawk)</div><div class='quotemain'>Eh, just a WR getting thrown from team to team. He'll most likely retire soon -- a WR is the most physically demanding position in football and the average NFL player plays about 3.4 years. Even if they (the bears) get him, it'll be like Jerry Rice and the Seahawks except with much less national attention.</div> Are you kidding me? The WR is not the most physically demanding position in football. Price is still really young and he'll get a chance on a squad somewheres but WR is not the most physically demanding position in football.</div> i agree with Porky wat are you talking about RB is clearly more demanding than anything the WR does, plus i'd have to say linebackers and DE and OL are more demanding than a WR. and liek Porky says there is no way hes gonna retire do you even know who this guy is its like his 5th year, when u say the avg nfl players career span is 3.4 years you are also talking the scrubby guys who cant get a contract, Price has gotten big contracts and has had amazing years, hes obviously got potential to be a great WR he just has been with Vick all this time.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ranman)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheBeef)</div><div class='quotemain'> Cause Orton can throw the football</div> He's not any better of a QB than Vick.</div> He's not a better RB than vick</div> Both of them are middle of the road QBs. Vick is not better than Orton and Orton is not better than Vick. Lets compare stats Passing Yards Att Comp TDs Ints QB rating Michael Vick 1612 247 141 12 7 81.2 Kyle Orton 1523 292 159 9 12 62.3 The stats are close so it wouldn't matter if Peerless Price played for Michael Vick or Kyle Orton. He still would suck!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ranman)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ranman)</div><div class='quotemain'> He's not any better of a QB than Vick.</div> He's not a better RB than vick</div> Both of them are middle of the road QBs. Vick is not better than Orton and Orton is not better than Vick. Lets compare stats Passing Yards Att Comp TDs Ints QB rating Michael Vick 1612 247 141 12 7 81.2 Kyle Orton 1523 292 159 9 12 62.3 The stats are close so it wouldn't matter if Peerless Price played for Michael Vick or Kyle Orton. He still would suck!</div> Nah, orton doesnt have game experience Vick has, or the weapons. When he is in league as long as vick, his passing numbers will be vastly superior. They shouldnt be compared, Orton is a QB, Vick is an RB who throws
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ranman)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'> He's not a better RB than vick</div> Both of them are middle of the road QBs. Vick is not better than Orton and Orton is not better than Vick. Lets compare stats Passing Yards Att Comp TDs Ints QB rating Michael Vick 1612 247 141 12 7 81.2 Kyle Orton 1523 292 159 9 12 62.3 The stats are close so it wouldn't matter if Peerless Price played for Michael Vick or Kyle Orton. He still would suck!</div> Nah, orton doesnt have game experience Vick has, or the weapons. When he is in league as long as vick, his passing numbers will be vastly superior. They shouldnt be compared, Orton is a QB, Vick is an RB who throws</div> But at the moment Mike Vick is the better QB. Muhammed the last I checked is a solid WR and Thomas Jones is playing very well.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BearsFan1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ranman)</div><div class='quotemain'> Both of them are middle of the road QBs. Vick is not better than Orton and Orton is not better than Vick. Lets compare stats Passing Yards Att Comp TDs Ints QB rating Michael Vick 1612 247 141 12 7 81.2 Kyle Orton 1523 292 159 9 12 62.3 The stats are close so it wouldn't matter if Peerless Price played for Michael Vick or Kyle Orton. He still would suck!</div> Nah, orton doesnt have game experience Vick has, or the weapons. When he is in league as long as vick, his passing numbers will be vastly superior. They shouldnt be compared, Orton is a QB, Vick is an RB who throws</div> But at the moment Mike Vick is the better QB. Muhammed the last I checked is a solid WR and Thomas Jones is playing very well.</div> Doesnt stack up to the 2 1st rd backs, pro bowl TE, and 2 1st rd WRs vick has had the last 2 years. He has more weapons. Less Wins, and like all the vickolytes like to point out, that is all that matters, so in thier eyes, they should see orton as a top 10 qb, since he is in top 10 in wins
Vick is way better than Orton. If Vick had the defense on the bears than he would probly be undefeated. When a defense looks at their schedule they dont look and see Kyle Orton and how are they are gonna gameplan against him, they do that for Vick. Vick can go out and win any game, if Orton had the falcons defense he would be considered a horrible QB because he doesnt win games but because Orton has a great defense and only has 2 throw for like 90 yards a game he isnt considered a bad QB.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (panthersare#1)</div><div class='quotemain'>Vick can go out and win any game</div> But he just chooses not to??
