This is my first post here. I want to begin by getting an old issue addressed. I want to know how many feel this way: I feel that when Xavier McDaniels came to the Knicks and with his performance in the playoffs losing him might have been key in us falling short of a ring in the Patrick era. I truly believe McDaniels, Oakley and Ewing were the perfect make-up of a tough talented intimidating frontcourt that was starting to gel in the series vs the hated Bulls. It stills frustrates that we never had a chance to see how far they could have gone. As it turns out, we never really found a good pure small forward to play along Oak/Pat. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. NOT QUITTING 'TILL THE RING IS OUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting KnickFreak:</div><div class="quote_post">This is my first post here. I want to begin by getting an old issue addressed. I want to know how many feel this way: I feel that when Xavier McDaniels came to the Knicks and with his performance in the playoffs losing him might have been key in us falling short of a ring in the Patrick era. I truly believe McDaniels, Oakley and Ewing were the perfect make-up of a tough talented intimidating frontcourt that was starting to gel in the series vs the hated Bulls. It stills frustrates that we never had a chance to see how far they could have gone. As it turns out, we never really found a good pure small forward to play along Oak/Pat. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. NOT QUITTING 'TILL THE RING IS OUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!</div> Welcome, hope you're here to stay for awhile! Anyway, I'm not too familiar with the early 90's Knicks, but Tribute or Knicks Analyst (if he ever shows up) might be able to help you out.
