Well, the Bulls just improved with possibly the best defensive juggernaut in the NBA. The Nets are pretty much the same as before. There is reason for cheer in Chicago.
^ sorry but i doubt we have a deeper bench i mean i am a nets fan but the bulls bench in very strong, they have deng as there 6th man, then they also have duhon, sweetny, thomas, that other rookie i dont feel like tring to spell his name lol, adrian griffen we have marcus williams eddie house and cliff robinson and jay williams and antoine wright and hassan adams, idk i personally like the bulls bench a whole lot better
<div class="quote_poster">jefferson Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">^ sorry but i doubt we have a deeper bench i mean i am a nets fan but the bulls bench in very strong, they have deng as there 6th man, then they also have duhon, sweetny, thomas, that other rookie i dont feel like tring to spell his name lol, adrian griffen we have marcus williams eddie house and cliff robinson and jay williams and antoine wright and hassan adams, idk i personally like the bulls bench a whole lot better</div> But overall, we are much better. Our big three is better than their's. The are the better defensive team, we are the better offensive team.
the bulls are not bad offensively at all. deng, heinrich,gordon, and nocioni can all put the ball in the hoop. they should give the top teir teams in the nba a run for their money.
<div class="quote_poster">Answer_AI03 Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">the bulls are not bad offensively at all. deng, heinrich,gordon, and nocioni can all put the ball in the hoop. they should give the top teir teams in the nba a run for their money.</div> I never said the Bulls offense was bad I just said that the Nets offense is better.
<div class="quote_poster">Carter Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">I never said the Bulls offense was bad I just said that the Nets offense is better.</div> Even if that's true, it's not a big enough difference to make up for the Bulls' advantage in defense, depth, rebounding, and coaching. You can make a case for the Bulls being a bit overrated, but there's no way they're worse than the Nets.
Hold on, the addition of Ben Wallace is not necessarily going to make the Bulls the Pistons of the last two years. He was in an ideal situation for his talents in Detroit with 4 other elite defenders playing alongside him. Not to say they won't be good defensively, but they're not going to be Piston or Spurs-esque. Lets not forget that we are a pretty damn good defensive team ourselves. Our offense should get better this year as well, as we actually have a bench and we are implementing a running style. I will concede, though, that the Bulls' bench kicks the **** out of ours, as they might just have one of the best benches in the league. The Bulls defence is not necessarily better than ours, but our offence is not necessarily better than theirs. They have a better bench, but we have better starters and someone who can take over down the stretch in Vince. Right now, it's just too early to say who will be better.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting XSV:</div><div class="quote_post">The Bulls defence is not necessarily better than ours, but our offence is not necessarily better than theirs. They have a better bench, but we have better starters and someone who can take over down the stretch in Vince. Right now, it's just too early to say who will be better.</div> I don't really disagree with you here. But, when 2 teams are that evenly matched, the better bench is usually what pushes one over the top. What's more, I find the Bulls' roster to be more balanced in terms of talent and depth for every position.
^I have to disagree about the bench pushing a team over the top. Starters play the majority of minutes, and I really believe that having talented go-to guys that are used to making big plays down the stretch is what pushes a team over the top. We have Vince Kidd and RJ. Who is going to take the big shots down the strecth for the Bulls? I wouldn't put my faith in Gordon just yet. The Mavs bench was far better than the Heats, but Wade and the Heat starters were just too much for the Mavs.
<div class="quote_poster">XSV Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Hold on, the addition of Ben Wallace is not necessarily going to make the Bulls the Pistons of the last two years. He was in an ideal situation for his talents in Detroit with 4 other elite defenders playing alongside him. Not to say they won't be good defensively, but they're not going to be Piston or Spurs-esque. Lets not forget that we are a pretty damn good defensive team ourselves. Our offense should get better this year as well, as we actually have a bench and we are implementing a running style. I will concede, though, that the Bulls' bench kicks the **** out of ours, as they might just have one of the best benches in the league. The Bulls defence is not necessarily better than ours, but our offence is not necessarily better than theirs. They have a better bench, but we have better starters and someone who can take over down the stretch in Vince. Right now, it's just too early to say who will be better.</div> Chicago does not need to be the Pistons to beat New Jersey, their go to guy is essentially Heinrich and having Ben Wallce under the basket spells bad baskets gone good. Chicago is already in New Jersey status and having Ben makes them alot better now defensively. I don't see New Jersey beating them in a best of 7 playoff at this point.
<div class="quote_poster">XSV Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">^I have to disagree about the bench pushing a team over the top. Starters play the majority of minutes, and I really believe that having talented go-to guys that are used to making big plays down the stretch is what pushes a team over the top. We have Vince Kidd and RJ. Who is going to take the big shots down the strecth for the Bulls? I wouldn't put my faith in Gordon just yet. The Mavs bench was far better than the Heats, but Wade and the Heat starters were just too much for the Mavs.</div> Well, I guess that's just a difference of opinion then. But, depth, in my books, is one of the more overlooked factors with any team. It keeps the pressure on a team for the entire game and allows a coach to adjust lineups to be more specific to his opponent. Also, it gives your stars enough of a rest to make them more effective when they are playing. You can use the Mavs/Heat example, but Miami had a very good bench as well. A better example would be Miami vs. Detroit. The Pistons had arguably the best starting lineup in the league, but the Heat's depth/bench pushed them to the Finals.
<div class="quote_poster">Chutney Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Well, I guess that's just a difference of opinion then. But, depth, in my books, is one of the more overlooked factors with any team. It keeps the pressure on a team for the entire game and allows a coach to adjust lineups to be more specific to his opponent. Also, it gives your stars enough of a rest to make them more effective when they are playing. You can use the Mavs/Heat example, but Miami had a very good bench as well. A better example would be Miami vs. Detroit. The Pistons had arguably the best starting lineup in the league, but the Heat's depth/bench pushed them to the Finals.</div> i agree with you, cause your 100% right the beter your bench the longer you can give you players time to rest and that accumlates in the long run
Ok guys. I'm gonna just jump into this conversation and try to make peace. Yes, I'm a Magic fan so you guys can laugh all you want. Anyways, Carter leaving the Nets is a HUGE blow as it was for Toronto. Carter isn't only valuable for his "highlight dunks." The man is a good 3pt shooter and a good defender. He has also stopped being a one man player and start being a team player. He should prob stay with the Nets to be honest. A lot of teams will want him especially the Bobcats and Orlando. Orlando has changed their direction to looking at Josh Howard recently. But VC should stay there because they have a good veteran PG in Kidd, a good running mate with RJ, a good, young, decent Center in Krstic and also good rookies that just came in. Are the Nets boring?? Who cares?? That doesn't matter at all. Are the Spurs boring?? HELL YEAH! But they are dominant as hell. Is Tim Duncan exciting to watch?? HELL NO!!! Does he care?? No. You know why?? Because he is one of the best PFs to ever play the game.
Its true, it really doesnt matter if a team is boring or not, except to the fans, but is Vince really going to win anything in new jersey? There will be other teams looking for him when he is a free agent that will probably be better than the nets by then. I think the young players for charlotte and orlando (if they can sign him) will complement carter alot better than an aging pg in kidd. Both these teams will be better defensivley also, giving carter more energy on offense. i just dont see why he would stay in nj.
<div class="quote_poster">Kidd Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Shaq didn't even hurt the Nets. He was close to being a non factor. Either he is really slowing down, or it was Collins that really shut him down.</div> Let me ask you? How is Shaq a non factor? He's a very intimidating factor in the paint. I don't care who you are, but if you're driving to the basket and Shaq is there, you'll think twice, about driving. Even if Shaq is not playing great, you still are afraid of him, because of size etc. He made it easier for Wade to do what he does, the same way he made it easier for Kobe to do what he does and make the team win. He will be a big factor for about another 3 years, so don't even start with Collins. Bottom line is, Miami did beat New Jersey and that's that. Miami would have had a tougher time with just Wade doing his stuff and you know that.
I'm sorry but I wasn't specific in my past post. I mean to say he was a non-factor on the offensive end. <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">He will be a big factor for about another 3 years,</div> He's already slowing down and you can see it. No way is he gonna be a big factor for 3 more seaons. <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Bottom line is, Miami did beat New Jersey and that's that.</div> I never denied it. They gave them a hard time even if the Nets only won 1 game. It wasn't exactly an easy sweep, they had to work for it. In the end it was Wade <u>and</u> thier bench that really killed us.
<div class="quote_poster">Kidd Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">I'm sorry but I wasn't specific in my past post. I mean to say he was a non-factor on the offensive end. He's already slowing down and you can see it. No way is he gonna be a big factor for 3 more seaons. I never denied it. They gave them a hard time even if the Nets only won 1 game. It wasn't exactly an easy sweep, they had to work for it. In the end it was Wade <u>and</u> thier bench that really killed us.</div> Wow, denial, I tell you. 4-1 is a bad beat my friend, 4-2 is a bit more substantial. Being beat 4-1 means that you're lucky you actually won a game and it wasn't a sweep.
