I'm Very upset

Discussion in 'NFL General' started by J-E-T-S 1083, Feb 24, 2006.

  1. J-E-T-S 1083

    J-E-T-S 1083 The Original Jets Junkie

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,757
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    very very very very upset.... there is trouble where they are trying to make a collective bargaining agreement. I heard on the radio that Gene Upshaw announced that they should not expect a new collective bargaining agreement by this year and next year they should not expect a salary cap in football.

    Let that sink in no salary cap.

    This is what i hate about the MLB, there is no salary cap so the teams arent that competative all the time. Ex. Yankees 200 mill then KC Royals 45 mill. Its ridiculous. Imagine in the NFL a team emerges as a team that just keep buying every good player for a ridiculous amount of money. It'll be awful for the NFL as it is awful for the MLB. i really really hope that this is sorted out and that there will be a salary cap for the sake of me watching the NFL, and its competativeness.
     
  2. vikingfan

    vikingfan nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I can't see this actually happening. The salary cap is one of the reasons for the success of football.

    I wouldn't be surprised if this is just politicking going on...
     
  3. bakes781

    bakes781 nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Revenue sharing is the key to the success of the NFL. The owners should have no problem with an increased cap. But yes there should always be a cap. The league is the most successful of all the major sports & it's only fair that the players get a piece of the pie.
     
  4. Cowboy71

    Cowboy71 Dallas Cowboys *********

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    1,742
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vikingfan)</div><div class='quotemain'>I can't see this actually happening. The salary cap is one of the reasons for the success of football.

    I wouldn't be surprised if this is just politicking going on...</div>
    Right, but doesn't the collective bargaining agreement end next week? That would mean there is no agreement, and thus no cap. I agree with your politicking comment, but on the other hand you know how long these things can stretch out before an agreement.

    The Patriots just decided not to tag Vinatieri because (according to BB) it didn't make sense to make any moves when they don't know what the cap is going to be yet. Thats probably not the complete truth, but if there is a little truth to it, then there is a big issue. Teams are going to want to agree - or at least agree to disagree (no cap) - so they can move forward. How long is everyone going to wait. Draft day is less than 2 months away....
     
  5. Pack Attack

    Pack Attack The KISS Army

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    There will be a salary cap in 2006. It's the 2007 season that's in question.

    The deal will get done... But it'll go down to the wire.
     
  6. Titans_Buckeyes

    Titans_Buckeyes NFL-*****s Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    No salary cap in football would be terrible, I can't see it happening. I think the NFL knows that'd it be bad for the sport, and hopefully they do everything in their power to keep it the way it is. Increased cap would be okay, but no cap would be wrong.
     
  7. TheBeef

    TheBeef Commish of FUN!

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,495
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Heres the deal....2006 is capped, and 2007 is part of the existing deal, but they put in this uncapped year to motivate both sides to negotiate before the CBA expires....Upshaw has made 2 specific threats, both of which could ruin the momentum the league has built....1.He says that if the league has an uncapped year, the union would never agree to a cap again and 2.He has suggested that if theres an uncapped year, he would decertify the union, effectively making all contracts void and everyone a free agent next seasons.....in other words, the destruction of the league as we know it.....there is one thing we have going for us: They are all greedy jerks....you can look at the worth of the baseball franchises(the Royals were for sale for less than $100 million recently) and see that thier system devalues franchises....NFL owners arent going to go for that....they all understand whats at stake, they all know that the pie is huge, and a smaller piece of a giant pie is better than all of a tiny pie....I think it will get done, just because theres so much at stake for both sides....if it doesnt, you can congratulate Nascar, the new king of american spectator sports....only the NFL stands between them and the thrown....
     
  8. nflfan04

    nflfan04 Dazed and Confused

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2004
    Messages:
    2,882
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    if there is no Salary Cap, i might actually stop watching the NFL. itll be like the MLB where it is the same TEAM dominating.
     
  9. Cowher&Frown Co.

    Cowher&Frown Co. nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    449
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    that would suck...football would become baseball...soon the superbowl will be 7 games long...
     
  10. nflfan04

    nflfan04 Dazed and Confused

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2004
    Messages:
    2,882
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    then it wont be so super...
     
  11. MKIV_Supra

    MKIV_Supra 2006 NFL-*****s FF Grand Champion

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    San Diego, California
    But in a player's point of view, that means more money for them! IMO, I think an uncapped year is not a good thing to do. It's how the league can keep things balanced. Basically what everyone else said, about the whole MLB thing.
     
  12. TheBeef

    TheBeef Commish of FUN!

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,495
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MKIV_Supra)</div><div class='quotemain'>But in a player's point of view, that means more money for them!</div>
    Its really not more money, its a lot less....if the sport suffers, the revenue suffers, and if the revenue suffers, the salaries decline....maybe the top 2% get thiers, but the rest get nothing to little....check how many baseball players are making the league minimum....do player really want 15 teams in the league that cant pay much over the minumum? and if the players refuse a cap, the league will counter by refusing free agents....so we get what we had before the strike season in the late 80s....dynasties are back, your property of teams until they dont want you, your salary is suppressed because you cant be a free agent unless your released....if pandora's box is open, everybody loses, 1st and foremost, the players and owners, its less money for all!
     
  13. Bearsfan1

    Bearsfan1 2 Time Defending FF Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2003
    Messages:
    6,450
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheBeef)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MKIV_Supra)</div><div class='quotemain'>But in a player's point of view, that means more money for them!</div>
    Its really not more money, its a lot less....if the sport suffers, the revenue suffers, and if the revenue suffers, the salaries decline....maybe the top 2% get thiers, but the rest get nothing to little....check how many baseball players are making the league minimum....do player really want 15 teams in the league that cant pay much over the minumum? and if the players refuse a cap, the league will counter by refusing free agents....so we get what we had before the strike season in the late 80s....dynasties are back, your property of teams until they dont want you, your salary is suppressed because you cant be a free agent unless your released....if pandora's box is open, everybody loses, 1st and foremost, the players and owners, its less money for all!</div>
    Actually, that is not quite right. Players would become free agents after 6 seasons instead of 3. The 4th 5ht and 6th season teams would get to make qualifying offer. There would be 3 franchise/transition tags per team. top 8 teams would be limited in free agency.
     
  14. J-E-T-S 1083

    J-E-T-S 1083 The Original Jets Junkie

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,757
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38

Share This Page