<div class="quote_poster">shapecity Wrote</div><div class="quote_post"> LeBron would be tempting, but he's not going to win a title without a post presence. Same with Wade, he's a great talent, but having Zo and Shaq on the court is the reason Miami had a successful season.</div> Of course, you're not saying they would have had a successful season without Wade, right? Because that would be crazy. Wade was easily their best and most valuable player last year.
<div class="quote_poster">durvasa Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Of course, you're not saying they would have had a successful season without Wade, right? Because that would be crazy. Wade was easily their best and most valuable player last year.</div> Of course not, but in the NBA it's easier to replace a scoring guard than it is to replace to servicable centers.
<div class="quote_poster">huevonkiller Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">No, I understand what he means. He's referring to the fact that older people remember players of the pre-2003 era (like Duncan, Garnett, and Kobe) more fondly and appropriately. I heard a joke in the offseason that Carmelo was now in the discussion for best player in the league(from popular outlets). This is insulting (since Duncan, Garnett and others should be mentioned before him). Also, people seem to forget that KG and older players still play in the league.</div> These are the players that are in the discussion for the best players in the league right now. Yes it is insulting because Duncan and Garneet were not mentioned. Also the list below none of them were MVP's of the season (even though kobe should have been MVP). 1.Kobe 2.LeBron 3.Wade 4.Vince Carter (i don agree as much here) 5.Carmelo (i don agree here either)
