Draft Discussion

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by panthersare#1, Mar 28, 2006.

  1. porky88

    porky88 King of Kings

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bakes781)</div><div class='quotemain'>I'm of the opinion that value should out weigh need on the 1st day. Therefore Bunkley would be my choice.</div>
    Exactly. Bunkley is a top 10 talent.. You don't pass on a top 10 talent at pick #14 right now..
     
  2. bakes781

    bakes781 nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Porky u wanna make the pick? my fingers are tired. [​IMG]
     
  3. bakes781

    bakes781 nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Broncos are at 15 & my 3 choices for them would be:

    Chad Jackson
    Tamba Hali
    Tye Hill
     
  4. porky88

    porky88 King of Kings

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I like Chad Jackson here as well. I think that's the guy they're targeting when they traded up..

    Another thing I could see them doing is trading with the 49ers and taking Vernon Davis at #6.

    If they stay at #15 Chad Jackson is there guy.
     
  5. bakes781

    bakes781 nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    My only hesitation with taking Jackson here is they can probably get Pope at #22 & the combo of Hali/Pope sounds better than Jackson/Kiwanuka to me.
     
  6. porky88

    porky88 King of Kings

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I think they'd take Kamerion Wimbley over Hali and "Kiwi"
     
  7. bakes781

    bakes781 nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Interesting. I've heard Wimbley is projected as a LB though.
     
  8. porky88

    porky88 King of Kings

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bakes781)</div><div class='quotemain'>Interesting. I've heard Wimbley is projected as a LB though.</div>
    He's a tweener. He can play either or.. Unlike Manny Lawson I think he could play DE in the NFL.

    Denver could also go RB with the #22 pick. They don't have to go with DE...
     
  9. panthersare#1

    panthersare#1 The GM

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I like Santino Holmes here, who is more of a playmaker. Both ran 4.32s, but Chad Jackson at Flordia avged 10 yards a catch. Holmes has the skills to take it the distance every time.
     
  10. Bears#1Fan

    Bears#1Fan nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    They will draft Jackson here cause really how much more time does Rod smith have? he would be a good fit with lelie..
     
  11. bakes781

    bakes781 nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Weren't they something like last in the league in sacks though?
     
  12. Bears#1Fan

    Bears#1Fan nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I was going to say they need some defensive help.. but need offensive help aswell.. I still hold strong when i say jackson is their man..
     
  13. Bears#1Fan

    Bears#1Fan nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I guess tye hill would be a good fit for them too.. i mean who better to learn from then the best shut down corner in the nfl.. Champ bailey
     
  14. bakes781

    bakes781 nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Ranman has til 10pm EST to make the pick.
     
  15. panthersare#1

    panthersare#1 The GM

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    If you look at Holmes and Jackson stats, Holmes avgs 8.2 yards more per catch than chad jackson. Thats almost a first down more per catch!! Holmes also has had more yards, more TDs.

    So how can you not take Holmes here? Both run 4.32s, but Holmes is more of a playmaker, which Denver lacks. Denver has a Chad Jackson type reciever in Lelie, but they dont have a playmaker
     
  16. bakes781

    bakes781 nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I think height factors into it. Chad has 3 inches on Santonio.
     
  17. porky88

    porky88 King of Kings

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ken Dorsey would of went #1 overall if teams factored in stats and only stats which your doing in this case panthersare1..

    Chad Jackson has shown on a consistent basis to have better hands than anyone in the Draft. He's done all the workouts and he's done them better than anyone else. He has the height on Holmes.. and lets not act like he's not a big play threat either. In 2004 he averaged over 20 yards a catch and had 6 TD's... before getting hurt I believe.

    Jackson has become the #1 WR in this draft because of what he's done at his workouts. Amazing combine in which where he was clocked in at a 4.32 40 yard dash and an amazing pro day. At the skills challenge he caught 10 more balls than the 2nd place guy.
     
  18. Bears#1Fan

    Bears#1Fan nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (hoodie7)</div><div class='quotemain'>because none of the receivers coming out this year will make that big of an impact... theres no clear cut number one stud receiver</div>
    I just saw this.. and i have to disagree the fact is its all based on what they precive talent to be.. Like Tom Brady 6th round draft choice if they knew then what they know now.. he would be #1 overall... Ryan Leaf would have never been drafted and he would be selling used cars somewhere, Nathan Vasher, would be a top 5 pick if they knew then what we know now.. The fact is we never know who is going to step up and contribute..
     
  19. panthersare#1

    panthersare#1 The GM

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'>Ken Dorsey would of went #1 overall if teams factored in stats and only stats which your doing in this case panthersare1..

    Chad Jackson has shown on a consistent basis to have better hands than anyone in the Draft. He's done all the workouts and he's done them better than anyone else. He has the height on Holmes.. and lets not act like he's not a big play threat either. In 2004 he averaged over 20 yards a catch and had 6 TD's... before getting hurt I believe.

    Jackson has become the #1 WR in this draft because of what he's done at his workouts. Amazing combine in which where he was clocked in at a 4.32 40 yard dash and an amazing pro day. At the skills challenge he caught 10 more balls than the 2nd place guy.</div>
    The only difference in speed is that Jackson is .02 secs faster than Holmes. And size isnt really a big factor. Last year two recivers that are 5-10 or less lead the nfl in recieving. Holmes can return punts which is a plus.

    The broncos already have two big recivers, now they need a small one
     
  20. Bears#1Fan

    Bears#1Fan nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (panthersare#1)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'>Ken Dorsey would of went #1 overall if teams factored in stats and only stats which your doing in this case panthersare1..

    Chad Jackson has shown on a consistent basis to have better hands than anyone in the Draft. He's done all the workouts and he's done them better than anyone else. He has the height on Holmes.. and lets not act like he's not a big play threat either. In 2004 he averaged over 20 yards a catch and had 6 TD's... before getting hurt I believe.

    Jackson has become the #1 WR in this draft because of what he's done at his workouts. Amazing combine in which where he was clocked in at a 4.32 40 yard dash and an amazing pro day. At the skills challenge he caught 10 more balls than the 2nd place guy.</div>
    The only difference in speed is that Jackson is .02 secs faster than Holmes. And size isnt really a big factor. Last year two recivers that are 5-10 or less lead the nfl in recieving. Holmes can return punts which is a plus.

    The broncos already have two big recivers, now they need a small one</div>
    Lets see 5"10 or smaller well lets see.. Steve Smith and a good reason is delhomme only throws to him and when he can't he gets sacked or throws a pick trying to get it to him.. The other i belive is a guy by the name of santana moss if i am right and look washington has no other legitamite threat there except chris coolie cause he is the man...

    Now for Denver they have Rod Smith who i think is getting prescribed a walker next week, maybe mobile wheelchair its one of those.. As for lelie he is a good player inconsistant at times but Smith won't be around much longer... Jackson has the size, the speed, and the hands to be a legit threat
     

Share This Page