Should All Teams Be in the Lottery?

Discussion in 'NBA General' started by bbwSwish, Mar 28, 2007.

  1. bbwSwish

    bbwSwish Harder. Better. Faster. Stronger.

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    8,315
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Rockets coach Jeff Van Gundy wants to open up the NBA draft lottery to all 30 NBA teams in an effort to keep teams from losing intentionally to hopefully secure the No. 1 pick.

    "I think every team should have an equal chance at winning the lottery, from the best team all the way down," Van Gundy told The Houston Chronicle. "I don't want to accuse anyone of anything. I would say to take away any possible conflict of interest, everyone should have an equal chance at the top pick all the way down. That way there would be absolutely no question by anybody about anything.

    "If it's better for the game, they should do it. I never quite understood why losing is rewarded, other than [for] parity."

    According to The Chronicle, Van Gundy presented his proposal to the NBA, but wasn't taken seriously.</div>
    Source

    It's not going to happen since he wasn't taken seriously when he proposed the idea but what do you guys think of this? Would you want all teams to have a shot at landing the first pick?
     
  2. Pakman

    Pakman JBB ITS ON ME!!!

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2006
    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I think its a good idea, I mean ... why not?
     
  3. Bahir

    Bahir User power factor: ∞

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,994
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I think all teams should be in it, but the playoff teams should have a abysmal chanse of getting a high pick. Still though, that wouldn't help solving the problems with teams losing to get a high pick. If everyone had the same chanse in the lottery that problem would be solved, but it would ruin the chanses of a bad team getting good players to their team, at least most of the time.
     
  4. Moo2K4

    Moo2K4 NBA West Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    11,768
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Alburnett, Iowa
    I'm not a fan of the idea. I don't think playoff teams should even be mentioned. Making the playoffs is their reward. Plus, I don't think it's fair to the teams that were bad to have more people competing for it and making their odds a little worse.
     
  5. Midnight Green

    Midnight Green NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,487
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class="quote_poster">Pakman Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">I think its a good idea, I mean ... why not?</div>

    [SARCASM]Let's give the Mavericks or Spurs a chance to add Oden or Durant to their squad sounds like a great move.[/SARCASM]
     
  6. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    What the hell, of course not. The team with the worst record isn't even guaranteed anything.

    If you want to screw teams like the Celtics even more, just increase the good fortune of the other teams not in the playoffs.
     
  7. Ming637

    Ming637 BBW Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2003
    Messages:
    3,742
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Teams that aren't in the playoffs will still have a higher chance of getting the first pick, so it doesn't eliminate the fact that the worse you are, the better chance the have at the lottery. That just means that the playoff teams have a shot at the lottery too.
     
  8. Detroit Madness

    Detroit Madness JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2007
    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Of course not, but there needs to be seeding based on record.
     
  9. kobe23

    kobe23 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    3,563
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    College Undergrad
    IMO its a good idea but not to give every team an equal chance

    example there are 50 balls in the lottery

    10 - memphis
    7 - boston
    1 each - layoff teams
     
  10. MJordan

    MJordan JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    787
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    While the idea promotes equality, it is much better that lower standing teams can build upon their franchise rather than chancing an impossible to beat team. The value of the NBA would go down.
     
  11. durvasa

    durvasa JBB Rockets Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Messages:
    5,098
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Actually, if the goal is add more diversity to the playoff pool, it makes more sense to give an equal shot to any lottery pick to all non-playoff teams.

    A really bad team usually won't become good just because they get a high draft pick. However, if a middling team (like the Kings, say) gets a high draft pick, there's a much better chance they'll be come a legit playoff team or possibly a contender.
     
  12. dallasdude

    dallasdude JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,063
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    It would be interesting. Teams probably won't be tanking the season anymore just to get a high draft pick.
     

Share This Page