Offseason grades

Discussion in 'NFL General' started by Thoth, Jun 12, 2006.

  1. Thoth

    Thoth Sisyphus in training

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the 801
    per the June 16th Sporting News;

    A) Dolphins ? Lions
    A-) Giants Seahawks Texans ?
    B+) Bucs Browns
    [​IMG] Redskins Cardinals Jaguars
    B-) Panthers Falcons Jets? Cowboys Bills ?
    C+) Bengals 49ers Broncos
    C) Steelers Titans Bears Saints
    C-) Raiders Eagles? Packers? Rams Ravens
    D+) Chiefs
    D) Colts Chagers Vikings?
    F) Patriots?

    note: Those w/ question marks, I disagree with.
     
  2. MKIV_Supra

    MKIV_Supra 2006 NFL-*****s FF Grand Champion

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    San Diego, California
    I'd give the Ravens a B rather than a C-. Without the McNair trade then I would have leaned with the C-.
     
  3. J-E-T-S 1083

    J-E-T-S 1083 The Original Jets Junkie

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,757
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    well i thinkt he Jets should be higher basically cause of such a good draft also they added Dyson and Kimo VO
     
  4. Giantsfan1

    Giantsfan1 Thread Killer

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,193
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I definetely agree with the giants ranking I mean they took care of every hole except DT. And I have faith in what they are trying to do in that position.

    Texans A- WTF?
     
  5. bakes781

    bakes781 nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Ouch an F! Granted we lost several key FAs, but I'd say we had one of the better drafts. Of course only time will tell on that.
     
  6. vikingfan

    vikingfan nfl-*****s member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Eh...whenever they say a team had a great offseason, it seems to be accompanied with a poor regular season. I'll gladly take the bad grade. [​IMG]
     
  7. porky88

    porky88 King of Kings

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vikingfan)</div><div class='quotemain'>Eh...whenever they say a team had a great offseason, it seems to be accompanied with a poor regular season. I'll gladly take the bad grade. [​IMG]</div>
    word

    Notice the Lions are at the top like every year. I'm not sure why though. Ross Verba Corey Bradford 2 backup QB's and Bashir along with their draft. I'm not sure if it's an A.
     
  8. panthersare#1

    panthersare#1 The GM

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Bills i would give an F, they lost Lawyer Milloy Mike Williams, and Eric Moulds!!

    Panthers i would give an A-, they add Keyshawn, Kemoautu, Shaun Williams, Daimone Lewis, Na'll Diggs, Keith Adams, Justin Hartwig.

    I didnt think the bucs had that great of an offseason. They lost Brian Griese and didnt really sign anybody.
     
  9. Thoth

    Thoth Sisyphus in training

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the 801
    Bills just cut their starting OLG and the trade up to get McCargo was idiotic @ best.

    Bucs signed David Boston.
     
  10. Thoth

    Thoth Sisyphus in training

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the 801
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bakes781)</div><div class='quotemain'>Ouch an F! Granted we lost several key FAs, but I'd say we had one of the better drafts. Of course only time will tell on that.</div>
    Losing Vinatieri & McGinest hurt but drafting Jackson, Maroney helped as well as acquiring Sullivan from Nola.
     
  11. Pack Attack

    Pack Attack The KISS Army

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    BA, you put a ? after the Pack's grade because you didn't agree with it. Do you think it should have been higher or lower?
     
  12. porky88

    porky88 King of Kings

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm not sure if GB deserves a C-

    GB added Ryan Pickett, Charles Woodson, Ben Taylor, Marc Boerigter, and Kenrick Allen. Drafted AJ Hawk and Daryn Colledge who'll both start.

    Lost Nail Diggs, Robert Thomas, Grady Jackson, and Mike Flaniagan.

    Granted Woodson is a boom or bust signing but as long as he stays healthy, he's a huge upgrade over Carroll.

    Pickett is younger and I think better than Jackson.

    Hawk and Taylor are huge upgrades to the LB core.

    Flanny was a leader but his skills were diminishing imo. I actually thought Wells outplayed him last year.

    I think at least a B- for the Pack. I thought our off season was pretty decent.
     
  13. Thoth

    Thoth Sisyphus in training

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the 801
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (porky88)</div><div class='quotemain'>I'm not sure if GB deserves a C-

    GB added Ryan Pickett, Charles Woodson, Ben Taylor, Marc Boerigter, and Kenrick Allen. Drafted AJ Hawk and Daryn Colledge who'll both start.

    Lost Nail Diggs, Robert Thomas, Grady Jackson, and Mike Flaniagan.

    Granted Woodson is a boom or bust signing but as long as he stays healthy, he's a huge upgrade over Carroll.

    Pickett is younger and I think better than Jackson.

    Hawk and Taylor are huge upgrades to the LB core.

    Flanny was a leader but his skills were diminishing imo. I actually thought Wells outplayed him last year.

    I think at least a B- for the Pack. I thought our off season was pretty decent.</div>
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pack Attack)</div><div class='quotemain'>BA, you put a ? after the Pack's grade because you didn't agree with it. Do you think it should have been higher or lower?</div>
    I think that having Favre come back is good offseason in & of itself.

    I think it should be higher as for all the reasons that Poky mentioned.
     
  14. Steelerfan_2005

    Steelerfan_2005 The Peacekeeper XL

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,849
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    There's no doubt that the Steelers might be good again this year, but fate has really been working against them since the minute they won the Lombardi. That C grade has probably slipped to a D+, maybe a C-. Take into account Jerome retiring, the loss of Randle El and Chris Hope, the injury to Ben, and Batch's fragility, you could see the Steelers struggle early. Getting nervous. Hopefully Ben recovers quickly and all is right in the world by preseason.
     

Share This Page