<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JCB @ Feb 24 2008, 06:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>McFadden ran a 4.27 on his first run and a 4.33 on his second (both electronically timed), and if I'm not mistaken, they usually make the "slower" electronic time the "official" time. And Barry Sanders ran a 4.12 forty.</div> And was Barry Sanders 40 time electronic? I have doubts about that. Source?
HAH, you're wrong. Google his times JCB. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>So Mayock stressed that McFadden's 4.27 hand-held time was clocked at 4.33 by the electronic timer (which is started by hand too). Then he fails to mention that Mendenhall's 4.36 hand-held time was clocked at 4.45 by the electronic timer. I'm so tired of Mayock's self-publicity stunt.</div> http://nflblogs.profootballweekly.com/NFLd...l_time_433.html Don't give me this clownish 4.12 stuff, Barry Sanders was the greatest Runningback, but he didn't run a 4.12.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Joker @ Feb 24 2008, 04:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Feb 24 2008, 03:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (o.iatlhawksfan @ Feb 24 2008, 03:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Can you really go to jail for downloading music off limewire?</div> Yeah of course. It's breaking the law. Don't drop the soap o.iatl </div> What are the chances of getting caught? </div> Extremely high.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 24 2008, 06:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JCB @ Feb 24 2008, 06:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>McFadden ran a 4.27 on his first run and a 4.33 on his second (both electronically timed), and if I'm not mistaken, they usually make the "slower" electronic time the "official" time. And Barry Sanders ran a 4.12 forty.</div> I never implied he didn't run a 4.27, merely what his official time was. Being able to consistently run a certain time is important imo. And was Barry Danders 40 time electronic? I have doubts about that. Source? </div> Actually, I meant Bo Jackson. I have no idea why I said Barry Sanders. Mental lapse. And I don't think his 40 was electronic. http://espn.go.com/classic/s/jacksonboadd.html <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Bo was timed in 4.12 seconds for 40 yards.</div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 24 2008, 06:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>HAH, you're wrong. Google his times JCB. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>So Mayock stressed that McFadden's 4.27 hand-held time was clocked at 4.33 by the electronic timer (which is started by hand too). Then he fails to mention that Mendenhall's 4.36 hand-held time was clocked at 4.45 by the electronic timer. I'm so tired of Mayock's self-publicity stunt.</div> http://nflblogs.profootballweekly.com/NFLd...l_time_433.html Don't give me this clownish 4.12 stuff, Barry Sanders was the greatest Runningback, but he didn't run a 4.12. </div> Meant Bo Jackson. Don't know why Barry Sanders entered my mind.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JCB @ Feb 24 2008, 06:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 24 2008, 06:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>HAH, you're wrong. Google his times JCB. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>So Mayock stressed that McFadden's 4.27 hand-held time was clocked at 4.33 by the electronic timer (which is started by hand too). Then he fails to mention that Mendenhall's 4.36 hand-held time was clocked at 4.45 by the electronic timer. I'm so tired of Mayock's self-publicity stunt.</div> http://nflblogs.profootballweekly.com/NFLd...l_time_433.html Don't give me this clownish 4.12 stuff, Barry Sanders was the greatest Runningback, but he didn't run a 4.12. </div> Meant Bo Jackson. Don't know why Barry Sanders entered my mind. </div> Alright JCB, but Bo Jackson was "timed" as a 4.12. That source says nothing about electronic timing.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JCB @ Feb 24 2008, 06:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ah! I know why I said Barry Sanders. Because Deion Sanders had a ridiculous time too.</div> What I heard about Deion Sanders' official time was that it was 4.28 in 1989.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 24 2008, 06:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JCB @ Feb 24 2008, 06:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 24 2008, 06:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>HAH, you're wrong. Google his times JCB. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>So Mayock stressed that McFadden's 4.27 hand-held time was clocked at 4.33 by the electronic timer (which is started by hand too). Then he fails to mention that Mendenhall's 4.36 hand-held time was clocked at 4.45 by the electronic timer. I'm so tired of Mayock's self-publicity stunt.</div> http://nflblogs.profootballweekly.com/NFLd...l_time_433.html Don't give me this clownish 4.12 stuff, Barry Sanders was the greatest Runningback, but he didn't run a 4.12. </div> Meant Bo Jackson. Don't know why Barry Sanders entered my mind. </div> Alright JCB, but Bo Jackson was "timed" as a 4.12. That source says nothing about electronic timing. </div> Never said his time was electronically timed. Electronic timing didn't even start until 1990.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JCB @ Feb 24 2008, 06:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 24 2008, 06:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JCB @ Feb 24 2008, 06:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 24 2008, 06:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>HAH, you're wrong. Google his times JCB. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>So Mayock stressed that McFadden's 4.27 hand-held time was clocked at 4.33 by the electronic timer (which is started by hand too). Then he fails to mention that Mendenhall's 4.36 hand-held time was clocked at 4.45 by the electronic timer. I'm so tired of Mayock's self-publicity stunt.</div> http://nflblogs.profootballweekly.com/NFLd...l_time_433.html Don't give me this clownish 4.12 stuff, Barry Sanders was the greatest Runningback, but he didn't run a 4.12. </div> Meant Bo Jackson. Don't know why Barry Sanders entered my mind. </div> Alright JCB, but Bo Jackson was "timed" as a 4.12. That source says nothing about electronic timing. </div> Never said his time was electronically timed. Electronic timing didn't even start until 1990. </div> If it's not electronic, I'm not trusting it. BTW, here is an interesting article: <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Team scouts and coaches have various approaches for getting the 40 time they use from those six sources. Some use averages. Some throw out slowest and fastest and then average the rest. Some ignore the whole thing and use a time taken by their own scout. So it is that Jackson's time of 4.12 at the Superdome is the best ever, verified by numerous reports that week in 1986, including a front-page story from USA TODAY. Melendez, with his 4.24 clocking in 1999, is at the top of the Indy combine list. As it turned out, his NFL career didn't last much longer than his clocking after he was drafted in the seventh round by the Atlanta Falcons. Champ Bailey turned in a 4.28 that same year, the same time set by Sanders in 1989 in New Orleans. They obviously went on to far more productive careers than Melendez, whose highlight was a 67-yard punt return as a rookie before being cut by several teams, including one in NFL Europe. He was out of the league by 2002. So the process and an accurate look at history should be kept in mind as the 40-yard times are announced for this year's draft prospects. The 40 time is good to know and makes for great conversation, but it doesn't make a Melendez into a Bo Jackson or Deion Sanders. So, beware any 40-yard time that is labeled as "official" from the combine. In deference to the players, NFLDraftScout.com uses the best verifiable ?€” or listed ?€” time from the combine unless it is conspicuously skewed from the other times, which happens when a hand timer has an itchy trigger finger on the stopwatch. However, the times are usually well grouped. Frank Cooney is the publisher of NFLDraftScout.com, the scouting agency of USA TODAY</div> http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nf...sh_N.htm?csp=34 So, 4.24-4.26 is about the range I was first going to say about the 40. I believe Jackson's 40 is hand-timed verified as a 4.12, so it is still dubious. Deion Sanders was 4.28 as I previously said.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 24 2008, 06:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>How do you even know MyNetsForLife?</div> Me? I was just trying to freak out hawksfan The chances are probably pretty low, unless you upload a shit load of songs, all from the same IP and username,
LMFAO! <div><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VH3bvYPZl6o&"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VH3bvYPZl6o&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350" /></embed></object></div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MyNetsForLife @ Feb 24 2008, 07:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 24 2008, 06:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>How do you even know MyNetsForLife?</div> Me? I was just trying to freak out hawksfan The chances are probably pretty low, unless you upload a shit load of songs, all from the same IP and username, </div> I didn't exactly want you to reveal that you were joking. I just wanted some more funny details since you constantly amuse me with your posts and "fixed" comments.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Big Frame @ Feb 24 2008, 09:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I thught the Suns was sposed to be a great team, and Shaq was going to send them over the top</div> *sigh* Don't listen to BSPN
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Big Frame @ Feb 24 2008, 09:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I thught the Suns was sposed to be a great team, and Shaq was going to send them over the top</div> The Suns realized that just being a great offensive team wouldn't get them over the hump. They needed someone new that could help bring a chamionship to PHX, but I really don't think Shaq is the right choice. It has only been 3 games, so I won't say that the Suns made a huge mistake, just yet.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (o.iatlhawksfan @ Feb 24 2008, 09:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Big Frame @ Feb 24 2008, 09:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I thught the Suns was sposed to be a great team, and Shaq was going to send them over the top</div> *sigh* Don't listen to BSPN </div> Watching the game today, Detroit kicked there ass http://sportsline.com/nba/gamecenter/recap...0080224_DET@PHO
