<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Dime is grading the NBA's major free agent signings this summer from twin perspectives: how the player did vs. how the team that signed him did. In both Vince Carter's signing with the Nets and Mikki Moore's signing with the Kings, the player did better, Dime believes. Carter got an A+ from Dime, the Nets a B+, Dime opining that the team wasn't going to find replacement scoring that easily. Moore got a B while the Kings received only a C. "Is he really gonna be as productive" out west, Dime asks.</div> Source
Mikki Moore will be productive if Mike Bibby gets him some easy looks. I think he will like playing in Sacramento. I agree with the Carter signing. It effected us more than him.
The best years of Carter are with the Raptors. I don't think any other team would have paid him as much as Nets did.
It's not like Moore is posting guys up, he's shooting mid-range jumpers, playing against big men in the West or in the East isn't going to do anything to that. I hate the whole West-East thing, people act like moving from one conference to another can kill a players game, or with the East make them better. It's really not true, maybe better in terms of All-Star votes if you're a forward. <div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">The best years of Carter are with the Raptors. I don't think any other team would have paid him as much as Nets did.</div> You sure you've been following the NBA market?
<div class="quote_poster">AMS_ice Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">The best years of Carter are with the Raptors. I don't think any other team would have paid him as much as Nets did.</div> Teams would of paid more. Carter is still top in the NBA is alot of categories. He is a star. I don't want to get into a debate on this, because well, it already happened.
