i doubt this is actually him, haha.</p> I wouldn't be surprised if this was a fake, like my Jerome Williams JYD myspace. I had to delete that one, because his brother messaged me and told me he'd start a lawsuit if i didn't delete it haha</p>
Yeah my computer locked up too. I can't recommend that anyone open that page.</p> It's not him, but a funny attempt. He referes to 'himself' in third person, and the poll that is posted is ridiculous subjective along with being writen in a way that is unseemly for a Stanford educated man.</p> Plus lets be honest, if Jason Collins has a myspace his user name isn't going to be jasoncollins35, its going to be "sausage lips"</p>
I like that the Jason Kidd in his friends list has his mugshot in his pictures section. I'm sure the real Jason Kidd loves showing that to everybody.</p>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (reganomics813)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> I like that the Jason Kidd in his friends list has his mugshot in his pictures section. I'm sure the real Jason Kidd loves showing that to everybody.</p> </div></p> </p> haha, yeah, right.</p> Does anyone here like to screw around on Myspace, and make dumb fake profiles?</p> I've done it once, and a friend has made Patrick Star.</p>
My PC locked too. But I was able to read a little.</p> On this +/- thing, though. Take a player, any player, give him minutes with quality starters who have good +/- (pretty much enough to "carry" anybody)...only take said player out of the game while the rest of the starters play additional minutes with subs who have less stellar +/- and bingo! what do you have?... that player will have the best or near best +/- on the team since each of the starters will do worse with a bunch of the subs.</p> Does that fit our man? Thoughts?</p> </p> </p>
hows about we start a s2 nets group on myspace? just as a secruity blanket, a backup if you will, if anything were to happen with this forum (crash, loss of data, etc ) just a thought. hows about we add each other? www.myspace.com/cougarmerkin
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Teaneck_Armory_Guy)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> My PC locked too. But I was able to read a little.</p> On this +/- thing, though. Take a player, any player, give him minutes with quality starters who have good +/- (pretty much enough to "carry" anybody)...only take said player out of the game while the rest of the starters play additional minutes with subs who have less stellar +/- and bingo! what do you have?... that player will have the best or near best +/- on the team since each of the starters will do worse with a bunch of the subs.</p> Does that fit our man? Thoughts?</p> </p> </div></p> </p> so you're saying that Collins is better than any sub who replaces him.</p>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Teaneck_Armory_Guy)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> My PC locked too. But I was able to read a little.</p> On this +/- thing, though. Take a player, any player, give him minutes with quality starters who have good +/- (pretty much enough to "carry" anybody)...only take said player out of the game while the rest of the starters play additional minutes with subs who have less stellar +/- and bingo! what do you have?... that player will have the best or near best +/- on the team since each of the starters will do worse with a bunch of the subs.</p> Does that fit our man? Thoughts?</p> </p> </div></p> </p> so you're saying that Collins is better than any sub who replaces him.</p> </div></p> Personally what I got out of that was that Collin's high +/- rating isn't contingent on Collin's skills, but rather the high ratings are dependent on the other 4 people around him. So you could plug in any role player and get a high +/- rating. Let me know if I'm totally off, though.</p> </p>
Pretty much GMJigga.</p> Take 4 players who obviously contribute to winning and a good +/-. Start 'em and play 'em say 35-minutes.</p> Take the rest of the team which isn't anywhere near this level...mainly negatives.</p> Take any of the rest. Play him 20-25 minutes almost always with the starters.</p> Meanwhile each of the starters has to play their add'l minutes with maybe 2, 3, 4 subbies at a time. Down go the +/- ratings.</p> So, wouldn't the guy who got the 20-25 minutes end up with the best +/- rating?</p> I haven't looked at all of these Nets statistics in detail (hey, I have a life). But it could be the case.</p> Stats can lie if you don't look at them right. Take 2 players, both rookies in 2006. Player A has a higher field-goal % in 2006.</p> Player A also has a higher field-goal % in 2007. But Player B can have a higher field-goal % lifetime (for those 2 years).</p> (That one blew my mind when I first heard it. tho' it was with baseball avgs.)</p> </p> </p> </p> </p>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JTbaLLa2o1)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> well rod benson accepted my firend requst, but didnt answer my message....</p> </div></p> I have been on his friends list for a while! </p> </p>
