</p> Big XII Championship #9 Oklahoma at #1 Missouri ABC 8:00 EST SEC Championship #14 Tennessee at #7 LSU CBS 4:00 EST ACC Championship #11 Boston College at #6 Virginia Tech ABC 1:00 EST Rest of the top 25 Pittsburgh at #2 West Virginia ESPN 7:45 EST UCLA at #8 USC Arizona at #13 Arizona State Oregon stateat #17 Oregon #19 Brigham Young at San Diego State</p>
UGA won't get in if they both lose. Neither would Kansas after them. BCS Analyst Brad Edwards said that voters probably would vote LSU or Va Tech (only if LSU lost) because they won their conferences and the Bulldogs/Jayhawks both failed to win their divisions.</p>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dissonance19)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> UGA won't get in if they both lose. Neither would Kansas after them. BCS Analyst Brad Edwards said that voters probably would vote LSU or Va Tech (only if LSU lost) because they won their conferences and the Bulldogs/Jayhawks both failed to win their divisions.</p> </div></p> </p> I would think that LSU would need to lose, but I don't know if VA Tech would get in over UGA. If VA Tech and LSU both lose, with Mizzou & WVU, that would certainly be interesting.</p> </p>
Tech is also ahead of LSU in the BCS at 6. They would need to beat BC. But they would need LSU to lose because of that loss earlier in the season. They're also the next 2 loss team who won their conference in the scenario that they do win it. As I said, what hurts UGA is the fact they didn't win their division. Voters get a week to think about it too.Edwards thinks they'll wanna avoid controversy and won't wanna vote a school in who didn't win their division.</p>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dissonance19)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> Tech is also ahead of LSU in the BCS at 6. They would need to beat BC. But they would need LSU to lose because of that loss earlier in the season. They're also the next 2 loss team who won their conference in the scenario that they do win it. As I said, what hurts UGA is the fact they didn't win their division. Voters get a week to think about it too.Edwards thinks they'll wanna avoid controversy and won't wanna vote a school in who didn't win their division.</p> </div></p> </p> It should be interesting.</p> </p>
I'm hoping for WV-Ohio State. It'd be a much more interesting game to me. All the shit OSU has taken, then having to take more shit because people are going to think blow out. It will motivate them to where it will be a game..</p> Not to mention, their fan bases have been going at it for awhile. And most of that started because they're the 2 lead schools in the (5 star QB and #1 recruit) Terrelle Pryor sweepstakes. Been following his recruitment since earlier this yr. I think I might have a man crush haha j/k.</p>
Mizzou - WVU would be far more entertaining than Ohio State - WVU</p> Also, I won't even get into how unfair it is that Ohio State can improve their position by not playing (on top of having a CAKE schedule this year).</p>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> I want to see WVU and Mizzou in the title game. If not them, anyone but ohio state</p> </div></p> </p> I agree with this post.</p>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dissonance19)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> UGA won't get in if they both lose. Neither would Kansas after them. BCS Analyst Brad Edwards said that voters probably would vote LSU or Va Tech (only if LSU lost) because they won their conferences and the Bulldogs/Jayhawks both failed to win their divisions.</p> </div></p> I'm perfectly happy if my Dawgs play your Hokies down in Miami. A two-loss team that didn't win their division shouldn't get to play in the national championship. The plus side of Ohio State reaching the national championship would be it might open the door for an entertaining Rose Bowl match-up, but I've heard that they might take Illinois over Georgia and some other schools.</p> </p>
