Nets should have moved to Prudential Center

Discussion in 'Brooklyn Nets' started by Real, Nov 28, 2007.

  1. Real

    Real Dumb and Dumbest

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Last week during the Thanksgiving break, I took my first trip out to the Pudential Center for the Seton Hall-Loyola game.</p>

    Even thought Seton Hall was playing a mid major, who ended up getting blown out, attendence was up from the days at CAA. The arena itself is amazing. It blows the water out of the Verizon Center. I'd put it up there with the STAPLES Center, and it kills the Izod Center. The best part about it is there's not a bad seat in the house. Not one. The capacity is lower, the lighting is better, the food is great, and the staff is very receptive. Oh, and for those who care, the arena around it is incredibly safe, lots of police presence.</p>

    I think it's bullshit and a dumb move for the ownership to stay in Izod for the simple fact of being able to convert it into their own arena and try to smallen their defecit by drawing off the advertising revenue and whatnot. But even if you sprinkle lemon drops andput ice creamon dogshit, it's still dog shit. That sums up the IzodCenter right about now.How are all these potental season ticket holders who go to the games supposed to take a franchise seriously that honestly expects to compete with arguably a top 5 arena in the United States? Why do you think attendence is down all of a sudden? Nets games suddendly have to compete with Devils games and other events that are more accessible, and provide for a better fan experience. That has to at least be part of it.</p>

    I don't care if the Nets play there for two years. The Prudential Center is a perfect place for an NBA team, and the Prudential Center would be better off with one.There's even an area in the arena reserved for space for an "NBA expansion." What an incredible improvement going to Nets games would be if they played there, even if they sell Isiah Thomas popcorn.</p>

    And if you want to compare franchises, Jeff Vanderbeek and Bruce Ratner are both very good owners, with very different motives. Vanderbeek is an owner who loves the sport of Hockey, and isdeidcated to providing the best experiences for the fans of the Devils, which is part of the reason why his organization fought so hard for this arena, that and the fact that the Devils, nor any sports franchise, could survive at Izod. Bruce Ratner is someone who bought the team as the crown jewel for his massive real estate project and has eventually realized how to run an NBA franchise, but the real estate deal is his first priority, not the fans.</p>

    And yes, I realize the Nets own all of the advertising in the Arena and controls it. No, I don't really care. I'm not speaking from a business perspective, I'm speaking as a fan.</p>
     
  2. Jizzy

    Jizzy Capo Status

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    this current arena sux. the fans just make it worse. we most likely have the worst homecourt advantage in the league, it should be called homecourt disadvantage. how do you lose 6 straight at home?</p>

    cant wait for the day this team moves to Brooklyn.</p>
     
  3. soul driver

    soul driver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    real, you summed it up perfectly. I've not yet been to Prudential, but your statement proves what I thought anyway. hm..NBA expansion? Once the Nets move to Brooklyn, will we see another NJ basketball team at a REAL NJ arena in a few years down the road? (keep in mind, they may not be called "Nets" when they move to Brooklyn either)
     
  4. Dark Defender

    Dark Defender The Dark Passenger

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Part-Time Intern, Full Time Student
    Location:
    Jersey
    Stern has basically said there is no chance once the Nets move. Personally I love Jersey but I'm a Nets fan so if another team does come here I'm not going to care.</p>
     
  5. pegs

    pegs My future wife.

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,079
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I should make it my life goal to own the Nets. My thoughts are the current ownership will drive down the value of the team, and make it possible for me to buy the team with a thousand bucks and some chocolate chip cookies.</p>
     
  6. GMJ

    GMJ Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,067
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's bittersweet for me. Brooklyn is far away enough that I won't renew my season tickets (ie: my parents won't, and I can't leech them), so more or less I'll stop going to the games. That's a huge downer; I love watching them play, dressing up and cheering them on win or lose. Of course I feel bad that they have to be supported by an embarassingly empty Izod Center. I want the team to have a better "6th man" out there.</p>
     
  7. soul driver

    soul driver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    same here jigga. I don't have season tickets, but this season I purchased ticekts for like 9 or 10 games, and will do so as long as they're in NJ. I live 15 minutes away from the arena, can't beat that. If I were to go to Newark, it'd probably be the same amount of time to get there too, but since that's not the case..yeah, the Brooklyn arena will be "out of the way" for me so to speak, but I do plan to go there occasionally.
     
  8. SportsTicker

    SportsTicker News Feed

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Real)</div><div class='quotemain'></p>

    Last week during the Thanksgiving break, I took my first trip out to the Pudential Center for the Seton Hall-Loyola game.</p>

    Even thought Seton Hall was playing a mid major, who ended up getting blown out, attendence was up from the days at CAA. The arena itself is amazing. It blows the water out of the Verizon Center. I'd put it up there with the STAPLES Center, and it kills the Izod Center. The best part about it is there's not a bad seat in the house. Not one. The capacity is lower, the lighting is better, the food is great, and the staff is very receptive. Oh, and for those who care, the arena around it is incredibly safe, lots of police presence.</p>

    I think it's bullshit and a dumb move for the ownership to stay in Izod for the simple fact of being able to convert it into their own arena and try to smallen their defecit by drawing off the advertising revenue and whatnot. But even if you sprinkle lemon drops andput ice creamon dogshit, it's still dog shit. That sums up the IzodCenter right about now.How are all these potental season ticket holders who go to the games supposed to take a franchise seriously that honestly expects to compete with arguably a top 5 arena in the United States? Why do you think attendence is down all of a sudden? Nets games suddendly have to compete with Devils games and other events that are more accessible, and provide for a better fan experience. That has to at least be part of it.</p>

    I don't care if the Nets play there for two years. The Prudential Center is a perfect place for an NBA team, and the Prudential Center would be better off with one.There's even an area in the arena reserved for space for an "NBA expansion." What an incredible improvement going to Nets games would be if they played there, even if they sell Isiah Thomas popcorn.</p>

    And if you want to compare franchises, Jeff Vanderbeek and Bruce Ratner are both very good owners, with very different motives. Vanderbeek is an owner who loves the sport of Hockey, and isdeidcated to providing the best experiences for the fans of the Devils, which is part of the reason why his organization fought so hard for this arena, that and the fact that the Devils, nor any sports franchise, could survive at Izod. Bruce Ratner is someone who bought the team as the crown jewel for his massive real estate project and has eventually realized how to run an NBA franchise, but the real estate deal is his first priority, not the fans.</p>

    And yes, I realize the Nets own all of the advertising in the Arena and controls it. No, I don't really care. I'm not speaking from a business perspective, I'm speaking as a fan.</p>

    </div></p>

    Three arenas in four years makes no sense.</p>

    Vanderbeek is not running a charity. He intends to make money. He got the city of Newark to provide him with more money than the city of New York will provide Ratner, $265 million to $202 million.</p>

    </p>

    </p>
     
  9. Belarus

    Belarus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jizzy)</div><div class='quotemain'></p>

    this current arena sux. the fans just make it worse. we most likely have the worst homecourt advantage in the league, it should be called homecourt disadvantage. how do you lose 6 straight at home?</p>

    cant wait for the day this team moves to Brooklyn.</p>

    </div></p>

    Count me in! I'm gonna ruin my vocal ligaments [​IMG]</p>

    </p>
     
  10. Teaneck_Armory_Guy

    Teaneck_Armory_Guy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Won't matter to me where they play that much as long as they still visit Atlanta. I prefer cheering for the "New Jersey Nets", don't mind "Brooklyn Nets", but hope they don't come up with another nickkname. I'd really hate it if they ever moved out of the metro area. Even then, I'd still be a fan, I guess.</p>
     
  11. Teaneck_Armory_Guy

    Teaneck_Armory_Guy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Another thought just occured to mee. I am starting to sense a grand master plan to capture all of the fans of the megapolis between Philly and NY. Central Jersey, Northern Jersey, Long Island, Brooklyn...</p>

    Next up...Yonkers?</p>
     
  12. Belarus

    Belarus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Teaneck_Armory_Guy)</div><div class='quotemain'></p>

    Won't matter to me where they play that much as long as they still visit Atlanta. I prefer cheering for the "New Jersey Nets", don't mind "Brooklyn Nets", but hope they don't come up with another nickkname. I'd really hate it if they ever moved out of the metro area. Even then, I'd still be a fan, I guess.</p>

    </div></p>

    Nah, I'd be cheering for the Knicks!</p>

    </p>

    j/k [​IMG]))</p>

    </p>
     
  13. GMJ

    GMJ Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,067
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Brooklyn Nets...eh. I think New York Nets has a better ring to it. Of course that could be because it fits the established New York _ets model.</p>
     
  14. soul driver

    soul driver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    that, plus there's history with the name New York Nets. but an article I read on NetsDaily a week or two ago said something along the lines of "it's going to be Brooklyn, but it may not be Nets"
     
  15. zєяσ

    zєяσ Truth is beautiful

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I wonder what it would take logically for the Nets just to play at the arena in Newark for next season.</p>
     
  16. soul driver

    soul driver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I really wonder why they turned down the offer in the first place when it was first developed? granted, they WERE moving to Brooklyn in a few years anyway, but it would have been nice.
     
  17. GMJ

    GMJ Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,067
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (soul driver)</div><div class='quotemain'>"it's going to be Brooklyn, but it may not be Nets"</div></p>

    Now that is just outrageous</p>

    I mean whats wrong with NYN? Hell the franchise started that way</p>

    </p>
     
  18. JCB

    JCB The Savage Nation

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,056
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Jersey
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga)</div><div class='quotemain'></p>

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (soul driver)</div><div class='quotemain'>"it's going to be Brooklyn, but it may not be Nets"</div></p>

    Now that is just outrageous</p>

    I mean whats wrong with NYN? Hell the franchise started that way</p>

    </p>

    </div></p>

    New Jersey Americans.</p>

    </p>
     
  19. soul driver

    soul driver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    my thoughts exactly. as a die-hard fan, and I think speaking for all of us one way or another, but I'd be highly upset if the Nets are no more come Brooklyn.
     
  20. ghoti

    ghoti A PhD in Horribleness

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,516
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Been saying this since day one, about both the areans and the owners.</p>

    </p>

    </p>
     

Share This Page