Congress, Bush in clash over CIA interrogation tapes</p> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'></p> WASHINGTON (AFP) - Congress and <span id="lw_1197757437_0" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;">President George W. Bush</span> were headed for confrontation Saturday as US lawmakers accused the Justice Department of blocking their probe into whether the CIA tried to cover up torture by destroying interrogation tapes.</p> Lawmakers from both parties expressed outrage after Bush's <span id="lw_1197757437_1" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 50%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">Attorney General Michael Mukasey</span> asked a congressional panel to postpone its investigation of the destroyed videotapes on grounds it could jeopardize the Justice Department's own inquiry into the affair.</p> "Earlier today, our staff was notified that the Department of Justice has advised CIA not cooperate with our investigation," said a statement Friday from the Democratic chair of the House intelligence committee, <span id="lw_1197757437_2" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 50%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">Silvestre Reyes</span>, and the ranking Republican, Pete Hoekstra.</p> "We are stunned that the Justice Department would move to block our investigation. Parallel investigations occur all the time, and there is no basis upon which the attorney general can stand in the way of our work," the statement said.</p> "It is clear that there's more to this story than we have been told, and it is unfortunate that we are being prevented from learning the facts," it added.</p> The two lawmakers threatened to issue subpoenas to obtain relevant information and to force <span id="lw_1197757437_3" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 50%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">Central Intelligence Agency</span> officials to testify if the Justice Department refused to back down.</p> Democrats and human rights groups have charged the spy agency of disposing of the videotapes showing harsh interrogations of two <span id="lw_1197757437_4" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;">Al-Qaeda</span> operatives to hide evidence of torture -- a charge the CIA denies.</p> The tapes reportedly show the operatives undergoing waterboarding, a technique widely regarded as torture. But Mukasey himself refused to brand the technique torture in Congressional hearings in October on his nomination to become attorney general.</p> Lawmakers in the Senate and House of Representatives have demanded all cables, memorandums and e-mails related to the tapes from top CIA officials, but in his letter Friday Mukasey asked the House intelligence committee to put off any probe to allow the Justice Department and an internal CIA watchdog to complete a preliminary inquiry.</p> Mukasey, who became the country's top law enforcement official in November, said in his letter that responding to lawmakers' requests for key documents and testimony "would present significant risks to our preliminary inquiry."</p> "Consequently, we respectfully request that the committee defer its investigation of this matter at this time," Mukasey wrote.</p> "Our ability to obtain the most reliable and complete information would likely be jeopardized if the CIA undertakes the steps necessary to respond to your requests in a comprehensive fashion at this time," he added.</p> The revelation that the CIA taped harsh interrogations of at least two Al-Qaeda suspects after the September 11 attacks in 2001 has renewed allegations the Bush administration has allowed abuse and torture of detainees.</p> Hayden revealed last week that the tapes were made in 2002 and destroyed in 2005, just as Congress was investigating allegations of US abuse of "war on terror" detainees.</p> Hayden has denied the use of torture and said the tapes, intended as an internal check on how interrogations were carried out, were destroyed to prevent any leak that could identify and endanger CIA agents.</p> Meanwhile, Congressional attempts to force the CIA to adhere to military prohibitions on severe interrogation methods hit a barrier Friday when Senate Republicans blocked a bill late Friday, according to the <span id="lw_1197757437_5" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 50%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">New York Times</span>.</p> While the House of Representatives had already passed the addition to the 2008 intelligence budget applying the military's rules on interrogation to civilians, including the CIA, the Senate stripped the provision, on the grounds that its addition to the bill broke Senate rules.</p> Republican <span id="lw_1197757437_6" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 50%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">Senator Lindsey Graham</span> said earlier he would fight the measure.</p> "It would be a colossal mistake for us to apply the Army Field Manual to the operations of the CIA," Graham said in a statement Friday. "I believe in flexibility for the CIA program within the boundaries of current law," he said.</p> </div></p>
Considering that both the Justice Department and the CIA are, properly speaking, executive agencies, Congress should be stepping back at least until they've concluded internal investigations. However, since the actual structure of government has long been ignored, Congress has accrued to itself this power, among many others.</p>
