This will be a bad trade for both teams. Even though the Nuggets acquire Kidd, there is a gaping hole in the middle for them. Both Nene and Martin have histories of injuries. Nene is even injured right now! And at age 30, with a mechanically repaired knee, Martin is in no position physically to play consistent minutes at center. If the Nuggets hope to really compete for an NBA championship, they will have to face the likes of Duncan, Stoudemire, Nowitzki, Boozer, and maybe Yao if the Rockets can get their acts together. Who better than an athletic center, who just won the DPOY award? Kidd could be a good addition, but not at the expense of your only legitimate center. The only way the Nets should trade Kidd is for young talent, not, as was mentioned, for an "old head". Camby is not going to take the Nets to another level. In fact, the Nets will probably lose more games sacrificing their point guard of the last six years. And since they won't win any more games now, or in the future, how is this a good trade for the Nets? And how is Camby going to help improve Boone or Sean's game? His tutelage is not going to transform their game anymore than the Nets' training staff. They will get better with experience.
I was just reading something on RealGm about Larry Hughes being dicussed in trade talks, The talsk are between the Cavs and Wizards and the article also said about a team from the Atlantic Divison being involved in talks with the Cavs as well, anyone here think the Nets might be that team?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JAMES.SLIMM @ Dec 25 2007, 05:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I was just reading something on RealGm about Larry Hughes being dicussed in trade talks, The talsk are between the Cavs and Wizards and the article also said about a team from the Atlantic Divison being involved in talks with the Cavs as well, anyone here think the Nets might be that team?</div> Nets have no use for Larry "I Suck" Hughes. It's probably the Knicks interested.
