Magloire: http://www.nba.com/nets/news/All_Access_On...Transcript.html Sounds good, I think the nets guaranteed that he will start this season even though Thorn or someone said they didn't.</p><p class="style4" align="left">"This team has had the same starting five last couple years… can you make your way into the starting five for the Nets next season?</p> Absolutely. I wouldn’t come into this position otherwise." </p>
Re: Magloire: Kind of figuered, no way he would come here for a bench position.</p> I'm really high on this move, he is a legit big.</p> </p>
Re: Magloire: <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GM3)</div><div class='quotemain'> Kind of figuered, no way he would come here for a bench position.</p> I'm really high on this move, he is a legit big.</p> </p></div>Yeah i think he is too. Think about it, with the Blazers had their young guys they were trying to develope and Randolph, the Bucks had Bogut, Magloire didn't really fit with their teams. I think this is the perfect place for him.
Re: Magloire: I agree. They had no use for him in their lineups. Also he is one of the few enforcer type bigs left in the league.</p> Best thing about it is that is a very low risk move. </p>