AFC Championship: #3 San Diego Chargers (13-5) @ #1 New England Patriots (17-0)

Wow they just couldn't score.

 

Chargers won't win this one if they only kick field goals. I'm actually really surprised at how close this game is. The offense has to step up because the defense will wear down. It's the fourth quarter already, they need to get something done and score a touchdown

 

****ing Patriots just scored.

 

Wow the Chargers are losing this one even though Brady is playing awful with these Prolific receivers.

 

Chargers need to score or its over.

 

This New England defense is the real deal.****

 

Damn...Seymour really is an asshole out there (what I've heard)

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bynumite @ Jan 20 2008, 05:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>This New England defense is the real deal.****</div>

Why do you say that? Rivers is injured and LT is out of the game. They're good but the Chargers messed up in the redzone.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (playaofthegame @ Jan 20 2008, 05:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Damn...Seymour really is an asshole out there (what I've heard)</div>
Philip Rivers "flopped"

 

Talk about a back breaker. Getting them to 2nd and 18 only to have the Pats convert. Great catch by Kevin Faulk as well, and losing that TO is going to hurt down the stretch.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>They do have the "Eff You TD." It's their little way of telling the other 31 teams, "You took shots at us after the Jets game, you discredited our three Super Bowls, you pretended we were the only team stealing opposing signals when everyone does it, so you know what? Eff you.</div>

 

**** Faulk.

 

Kevin Faulk for game MVP? He's having a great game and just picked up back to back huge 3rd down conversions for the Pats.

 

Why is Tomlinson still wearing his helmet? Lol man it's over.

 

Why didn't LT play? I thought he was 90%

 

This game might as well be over. Maroney has dominated the second half, and in general the Pats have dominated the second half, despite a couple of INTs by Brady.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brian @ Jan 20 2008, 05:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Why didn't LT play? I thought he was 90%</div>

Kind of a rhetorical question. He wasn't 90%, he lied. He got injured badly with Indy and he was done.

 

Chargers will be back next year and IMO next year's their year and they will make the super bowl next year...no doubt in my mind.

I'm just not gonna wanna hear all the excuses made from now until the 2008/2009 season with all the "woulda, coulda, shoulda" crap about if LT played. Honestly if an injured LT had played what more would he have done than a 100% Michael Turner who has the type of talent to start on pretty much every other team in the league?

 

You could tell from the beginning of the game that LT wasn't himself. The main play I'll point out was his lone catch. How often do you see LT shy away from contact the way he did? Not often. If he's healthy, he attempts to cut that upfield and take the contact as opposed to running out of bounds.

 

When or three best players are injured this happens.Gates, LT and Rivers, **** the New England Patriots and there ****ing perfect season!