<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jizzy @ Jan 16 2008, 10:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>i am....speechless</div> What gon happen to ur wifey?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Black Republican @ Jan 16 2008, 10:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jizzy @ Jan 16 2008, 10:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>i am....speechless</div> What gon happen to ur wifey? </div> im not in the mood
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 16 2008, 10:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bling890 @ Jan 16 2008, 10:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>AND people need to stop telling me to post in a MATURE MANNER. This team has broken every fiber of sanity that remains in my brain. I am under no obligation to speak about this team in a calm demeanor.</div> Who in the hell said anything about calm? Besides, to this point, you haven't had any posts deleted from this thread </div> No one said anything directly about being calm, but speaking in an immature nature usually stems from irrational thinking caused by stress. So i figured that cursing and typing in capital letters (products of my frustration) would fall under the classification of immature. I then followed by telling you not to tell us to be calm (or mature) about this P.O.S team
Ok sportsman ship or just retarded the whole nets team goes into the locker room yet vince is on the court exchanging hugs and jokes with knicks players?
What was more painful this game: 1) Crawford chucking and making ridiculous shots down the stretch 2) Knicks fans chanting for the Knicks at the end 3) Or the Big 3 making bone headed plays down the stretch
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jan 16 2008, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>What was more painful this game: 1) Crawford chucking and making ridiculous shots down the stretch 2) Knicks fans chanting for the Knicks at the end 3) Or the Big 3 making bone headed plays down the stretch</div> It's not really chucking per se. Crawford is one of the more underrated players in the clutch and I was pretty confident in all the shots he "chucked".
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (d-blockrep2 @ Jan 16 2008, 10:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ok sportsman ship or just retarded the whole nets team goes into the locker room yet vince is on the court exchanging hugs and jokes with knicks players?</div> no one takes losing better than Vince Carter
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (killa kadafi191 @ Jan 16 2008, 10:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (d-blockrep2 @ Jan 16 2008, 10:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ok sportsman ship or just retarded the whole nets team goes into the locker room yet vince is on the court exchanging hugs and jokes with knicks players?</div> no one takes losing better than Vince Carter </div> Once again enjoying your posts lolol so true bout carter
I missed American Idol for this ***** *** ***** *** game. You know, I think the bench let the Nets down in the first half when the game really should have been put away. The starters got a nice lead and flow to start the game in the first quarter and just were having their way with the Knicks. The Knicks seemed to be on the verge of collapsing and the bench had a all this positive flow to work off of and they didn't extend the lead to like 25 points and bury the Knicks in the first half. Instead the Knicks hung around and were able to still chip away at the lead and eventually turn the momentum in their favour. I'm putting that on the bench guys.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bling890 @ Jan 16 2008, 10:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 16 2008, 10:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bling890 @ Jan 16 2008, 10:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>AND people need to stop telling me to post in a MATURE MANNER. This team has broken every fiber of sanity that remains in my brain. I am under no obligation to speak about this team in a calm demeanor.</div> Who in the hell said anything about calm? Besides, to this point, you haven't had any posts deleted from this thread </div> No one said anything directly about being calm, but speaking in an immature nature usually stems from irrational thinking caused by stress. So i figured that cursing and typing in capital letters (products of my frustration) would fall under the classification of immature. I then followed by telling you not to tell us to be calm (or mature) about this P.O.S team </div> The fact that you are self-aware enough to be concerned if it about you generally says it isn't about you
not seeing the game but realizing that we had a super hot start- could we say the bench didn't do what needed to be done?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (soul driver @ Jan 16 2008, 10:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>not seeing the game but realizing that we had a super hot start- could we say the bench didn't do what needed to be done?</div> That's usually the case. The starters build a lead, the bench comes in and the lead diminishes.
not to start anything, but I've been noticing a trend..I'm sure there's stats out there to prove it...but the past few games when we bring twin and allen in at the same time, we ALWAYS lose a lead.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (soul driver @ Jan 16 2008, 10:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>not seeing the game but realizing that we had a super hot start- could we say the bench didn't do what needed to be done?</div> we could blame the bench but the starters were in the game in the beginning of the third. RJ was the one who fouled Zach with 38 seconds and the nets down by three. Kidd missed the three. The bench did not perform as expected or needed but this game was still winnable. The Nets as mediocre teams usually do found a way to lose it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Balla 15 @ Jan 16 2008, 10:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (soul driver @ Jan 16 2008, 10:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>not seeing the game but realizing that we had a super hot start- could we say the bench didn't do what needed to be done?</div> That's usually the case. The starters build a lead, the bench comes in and the lead diminishes. </div> Can't blame the players themselves, blame management for allowing our bench playmaker to be a 39 year old defensive specialist and its offensive player to be an unproven streak shooter with no ball handling ability
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (killa kadafi191 @ Jan 16 2008, 10:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (soul driver @ Jan 16 2008, 10:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>not seeing the game but realizing that we had a super hot start- could we say the bench didn't do what needed to be done?</div> we could blame the bench but the starters were in the game in the beginning of the third. RJ was the one who fouled Zach with 38 seconds and the nets down by three. Kidd missed the three. The bench did not perform as expected or needed but this game was still winnable. The Nets as mediocre teams usually do found a way to lose it. </div> But the starters built a lot of positive momentum in the first quarter and the Knicks were ripe to get blown out in the first half. The bench comes in and they didn't build on the momentum and put the Knicks away in the first half. The Knicks just hung around for long enough and eventually made a run to get back within 3 by the half. That NEVER should have happened.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jan 16 2008, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (killa kadafi191 @ Jan 16 2008, 10:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (soul driver @ Jan 16 2008, 10:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>not seeing the game but realizing that we had a super hot start- could we say the bench didn't do what needed to be done?</div> we could blame the bench but the starters were in the game in the beginning of the third. RJ was the one who fouled Zach with 38 seconds and the nets down by three. Kidd missed the three. The bench did not perform as expected or needed but this game was still winnable. The Nets as mediocre teams usually do found a way to lose it. </div> But the starters built a lot of positive momentum in the first quarter and the Knicks were ripe to get blown out in the first half. The bench comes in and they didn't build on the momentum and put the Knicks away in the first half. The Knicks just hung around for long enough and eventually made a run to get back within 3 by the half. That NEVER should have happened. </div> true but at the same time the same starters that gave the Nets that great lead in the first were unable to duplicate the same play in the third. The game was still in the Nets hands. The Nets were not playing a contender or even a good team. They were playing the Knicks and as the game showed the Nets were able to come back from being down 15 they were not just able to finish. My point is it would be wrong to just put this on the bench. This game was still winnable.
I WANT FRANK GONE! b4 we break up this team get a new coaching staff in here please! nobody on that staff is a winner execpt for bill cartwright??!!! you have to be kidding!
<span style="color:#FF0000"><span style="font-size:8pt;line-height:100%">Stop acting so immature. - JCB</span></span>
