Denver doesn't want Kidd

Discussion in 'Brooklyn Nets' started by Kiddisanet, Jan 29, 2008.

  1. Kiddisanet

    Kiddisanet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2007
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    I am posting this because it makes me feel better.



    “The Nuggets have had no conversations with the Nets about Kidd, and there won’t be any conversations with the Nets about Kidd."


    http://www.myfoxcolorado.com/myfox/pages/N...mp;pageId=3.2.1


    Denver doesn't have anything to offer us anyway.


    Dave D also says the Lakers don't want to do anything (if it aint broke...), and Dallas would never give up Harris. Avery Johnson is basically in love with Harris and expects him to be an All Star next year. Don't ask me why. Dude's not that good. But that's who Dallas wants running the show.

    http://www.nj.com/nets/ledger/index.ssf?/b....xml&coll=1




    Cleveland probably knows they have no chance in this at all, and if they make an offer, they'll probably offer some garbage like Hughes who has a terrible contract. They really have nothing to offer.


    I'd say it's virtually impossible to trade Kidd because his contract is so damn large and we'd be forced to take on terrible and long contracts for players who are journeymen or just mediocre and useless. It would just suck. Why would any decent team that's playing well right now gut their roster for one guy, no matter who he is? They wouldn't. So Kidd is a Net.
     
  2. GMJ

    GMJ Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,067
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not trying to rain on your parade, but none of the links you posted work.
     
  3. Kiddisanet

    Kiddisanet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2007
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jan 29 2008, 06:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm not trying to rain on your parade, but none of the links you posted work.</div>


    Oops, sorry, I fixed them.
     
  4. ghoti

    ghoti A PhD in Horribleness

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,516
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    That's why Kidd is still here. He's hard to trade.
     
  5. o.iatlhawksfan

    o.iatlhawksfan ROFLMFAO!!!!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,907
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm sure Atlanta would want him, for the right price.
     
  6. soul driver

    soul driver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,347
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Kidd will most likely be a Net for the rest of this miserable season.
     
  7. Jizzy

    Jizzy Capo Status

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (o.iatlhawksfan @ Jan 29 2008, 07:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm sure Atlanta would want him, for the right price.</div>


    childress and shelden wiliams is enough for kidd
     
  8. Lavalamp

    Lavalamp Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Do their contracts add up to 20 mill?

    I checked it out, they add up to roughly 7 mill.
     
  9. Kidd Karma

    Kidd Karma Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I think the next week to 10 days are important in gauging how desperate Kidd wants out. Watch his numbers, watch his play, watch his demeanor. If he's still hustling and running out there, then it will be hard to trade him, if he starts sitting, the losing streak continues and the stats are very consistent, Thorn will just move him for 50 cents on the dollar.

    Harris is a base year comp player this season. The team he is going to will be charged for his full salary, but his trade value is only half of his salary. So that will put the Nets over the lux tax without further moves. NJ won't do that move without dumping salary to a 3rd team.
     
  10. Moo2K4

    Moo2K4 NBA West Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    11,768
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Alburnett, Iowa
    I think saying the Lakers don't want him might be a little false. They were in love with him last year but couldn't get a deal to go through because they liked Bynum way too much. I think that if Kupchak and Phil think Kidd will put them over the top they'll definitely look into getting him. Too bad for you, there's NO WAY Bynum is including this year and you'd probably have to take Kwame (expiring this year) or Odom (expiring next year), or both if you guys threw in Maagloire.
     
  11. Jumpman

    Jumpman And Your Nominees Are...

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kiddisanet @ Jan 29 2008, 05:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I am posting this because it makes me feel better.



    “The Nuggets have had no conversations with the Nets about Kidd, and there won’t be any conversations with the Nets about Kidd."


    http://www.myfoxcolorado.com/myfox/pages/N...mp;pageId=3.2.1


    Denver doesn't have anything to offer us anyway.


    Dave D also says the Lakers don't want to do anything (if it aint broke...), and Dallas would never give up Harris. Avery Johnson is basically in love with Harris and expects him to be an All Star next year. Don't ask me why. Dude's not that good. But that's who Dallas wants running the show.

    http://www.nj.com/nets/ledger/index.ssf?/b....xml&coll=1




    Cleveland probably knows they have no chance in this at all, and if they make an offer, they'll probably offer some garbage like Hughes who has a terrible contract. They really have nothing to offer.


    I'd say it's virtually impossible to trade Kidd because his contract is so damn large and we'd be forced to take on terrible and long contracts for players who are journeymen or just mediocre and useless. It would just suck. Why would any decent team that's playing well right now gut their roster for one guy, no matter who he is? They wouldn't. So Kidd is a Net.</div>

    Are you kidding me? Not that good? Harris is a stud, his jumpshot is getting better this year. But I thought Dallas' package only contained expiring contracts and a pick? When did Harris get mentioned?
     
  12. Shapecity

    Shapecity S2/JBB Teamster Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    45,018
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I'm pretty sure the Lakers would want him for the right price, the team has been broke since Bynum went down.
     
  13. #1_War_Poet_ForLife

    #1_War_Poet_ForLife The Baker of Cakes

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,176
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Lavalamp @ Jan 29 2008, 11:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Do their contracts add up to 20 mill?

    I checked it out, they add up to roughly 7 mill.</div>
    Where did you check? I only trust my NBA videogame.
     
  14. Lavalamp

    Lavalamp Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
  15. Netted

    Netted Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kidd Karma @ Jan 29 2008, 11:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I think the next week to 10 days are important in gauging how desperate Kidd wants out. Watch his numbers, watch his play, watch his demeanor. If he's still hustling and running out there, then it will be hard to trade him, if he starts sitting, the losing streak continues and the stats are very consistent, Thorn will just move him for 50 cents on the dollar.

    Harris is a base year comp player this season. The team he is going to will be charged for his full salary, but his trade value is only half of his salary. So that will put the Nets over the lux tax without further moves. NJ won't do that move without dumping salary to a 3rd team.</div>
    I think Thorn rather have Kidd sit home playing with himself until his contract runs out than to take back contracts that will hurt the franchise long term.
     
  16. Kidd Karma

    Kidd Karma Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Thorn will not be getting offers of long term stiffs....ie Radman's deal. I think Thorn should be getting packages that include,

    Kwame Brown/Jordan Farmar and contracts expiring this year or next from the Lakers
    Mavs, you're looking at Stackhouse, Diop, Bass, Barea, George and Hassell(2009)
    Cavs has the most future obligations to offer:
    2008 - Newble, Gibson
    2009 - Marshall, Snow, Jones

    I mean you pick up a package that includes expiring deals this season, and none extending beyond 2010, Thorn should be pretty happy.
     
  17. Dark Defender

    Dark Defender The Dark Passenger

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Part-Time Intern, Full Time Student
    Location:
    Jersey
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kidd Karma @ Jan 29 2008, 02:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Thorn will not be getting offers of long term stiffs....ie Radman's deal. I think Thorn should be getting packages that include,

    Kwame Brown/Jordan Farmar and contracts expiring this year or next from the Lakers
    Mavs, you're looking at Stackhouse, Diop, Bass, Barea, George and Hassell(2009)
    Cavs has the most future obligations to offer:
    2008 - Newble, Gibson
    2009 - Marshall, Snow, Jones

    I mean you pick up a package that includes expiring deals this season, and none extending beyond 2010, Thorn should be pretty happy.</div>

    Exactly.

    I hear Luke Walton and Vlad from the Lakers, Gooden and Jones from the Cavs etc. I rather let Kidd's contract run out then pick up any long term deals that goes beyond next season.
     
  18. Jizzy

    Jizzy Capo Status

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    lmao, kian "I am posting this because it makes me feel better" lmao
     
  19. Kidd Karma

    Kidd Karma Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GM3 @ Jan 29 2008, 02:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kidd Karma @ Jan 29 2008, 02:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Thorn will not be getting offers of long term stiffs....ie Radman's deal. I think Thorn should be getting packages that include,

    Kwame Brown/Jordan Farmar and contracts expiring this year or next from the Lakers
    Mavs, you're looking at Stackhouse, Diop, Bass, Barea, George and Hassell(2009)
    Cavs has the most future obligations to offer:
    2008 - Newble, Gibson
    2009 - Marshall, Snow, Jones

    I mean you pick up a package that includes expiring deals this season, and none extending beyond 2010, Thorn should be pretty happy.</div>

    Exactly.

    I hear Luke Walton and Vlad from the Lakers, Gooden and Jones from the Cavs etc. I rather let Kidd's contract run out then pick up any long term deals that goes beyond next season.
    </div>

    I can't see Thorn saying yes to Hughes, Walton or Vlad, they have deals going beyond 2009, unless it's a prospect like Farmar. Damon Jones comes off the books after next season. Gooden comes off next season too. Here's a thought, Thorn gets no trade offers for Kidd to his liking, Kidd finishes off the season and is in China for the Olympics....his last year on the contract is a player option........
     

Share This Page