<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>If Mike Miller is supposed to appear depressed, restless or openly bothered by the loud construction noise going on in FedExForum, someone forgot to alert the veteran sharpshooter that his mood should swing right about now. When the doors opened Thursday to the practice court, the Grizzlies' swingman was all smiles. He helped the new guys get through the plays. He joked with more familiar teammates, and then hoisted extra shots after practice ended in preparation for the Grizzlies' road game tonight against Dallas. What Miller said he can't help is that his name continues to swirl in trade rumors. Since the Griz obliged Damon Stoudamire with a contract buyout, traded Stromile Swift and unloaded Pau Gasol's contract for draft picks and salary-cap relief, Miller has been left with a young, rebuilding team and constant speculation that he's next in line to depart Memphis. Miller knows that it's possible that he'll be dealt by the NBA's Feb. 21 trade deadline but he seems unaffected by the notion. "If a deal comes they can't refuse, I don't expect them not to take it," Miller said. "We understand each other. I told them I'm going to play as hard as I can. I'm going to try to win games. And they've been completely honest with me." Miller spoke recently with Griz brass -- owner Michael Heisley, general manager Chris Wallace and head coach Marc Iavaroni. The message conveyed was that anything can happen. But Wallace passionately dispelled a myth making its way around the league. "I've never had more calls from people checking in and registering interest like they have since we made the trade for Pau," Wallace said. "They think we're in a deal mode. Some teams have an erroneous assumption we're just dropping money. "People have interest in our players. So I told these guys we're not trying to dump players. But it's our responsibility as a franchise to look at opportunities. I'll never tell a player he can't be traded. That's just not true. You see Shaquille O'Neal just got traded. "I told Mike that we value him. He's been a terrific asset in the community. He's having a great season. No one is looking to dump him for the sake of dumping. But I also told him people are calling and I can't offer a guarantee (he won't be traded). It would be disingenuous if I did." Once upon a time, a trade rumor had Miller and Hakim Warrick in a larger deal that would have essentially netted the Grizzlies Lamar Odom of the Los Angeles Lakers. Another speculative trade involves Miller for Miami's Ricky Davis and his expiring $6.8 million contract. Miller has two years and nearly $19 million left on his contract. What's enticing for potential suitors, though, is one of only three NBA players -- meeting the statistical minimums -- this season shooting better than 50 percent overall, 40 percent from 3-point range and 80 percent from the free-throw line. Then again, it is not inconceivable that the Griz may seek more salary relief during their commitment to a full-scale rebuild through a young nucleus, draft picks and free agency. "It's tough," Miller said of the Grizzlies' predicament. "But as long as they show commitment to me, I'll show commitment to them. When they signed me, they didn't promise me it was going to be all easy. "When I came here we hadn't been to the playoffs and we got there. Now it'll be fun to be a part of a team that makes a playoff push. It's just going to take a lot of work and some time." But does Miller have the patience that the Griz are asking their fans to display? "I have to at this point," Miller said. "Until they tell me I'm no longer with the team my patience is there. I've got to believe in what they're doing; otherwise it would be a struggle to come to work every day. So I believe in what they're doing. They want to win just as bad as I do. Sometimes it's harder to be patient when you've been in the league eight years and tasted success." Wallace emphasized that if Miller is traded, "there will be a basketball reason why we do it." Miller is hoping for more than that when it comes to motivation for a deal. "I wouldn't want to leave this place and go to a place that doesn't have a chance of winning," Miller said. "That's what scares me. ... At least here we care about winning. If teams are making offers right now I hope it's teams that are trying to win a championship."</div> Source: Memphis CA
i dont know... he would definitley reduce kobe's production... not that 'stats' are important but its important for a 'star'/'franchise' player like kobe to heat up once in a while... players like kobe should be 'game tuned' (not just physically conditioned) especially come playoff time.
Kobe's got nothing to do with acquiring Miller...if Kobe doesn't want Miller, then **** him (I don't think that is the case though, Miller and Kobe, if I recall correctly are great friends and had great chemistry during the team USA games). Miller would make this team absolutely potent because he can stroke it from deep. The opportunities that would be created for Miller with Gasol and Bynum passing out of the post, the doubles they attract, and the doubles Bryant attracts would be phenomenal. Miller would be the best thing this lineup could use. A starting lineup of Fisher, Kobe, Miller, Gasol, and Bynum is easily the best in the league.
I'd love to nab Mike Miller. He really extends the defense and brings consistency as well. Plus, with him in the lineup, Kobe, Bynum and Gasol should get some better opportunities in the paint. If they double on any of them down low and leave Miller open, we finally have a guy who can consistently kill them from the outside. So yes, I'd love to get him. The only issue would be who do we play at PF until Bynum returns?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Black Mamba @ Feb 8 2008, 01:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Kobe's got nothing to do with acquiring Miller...if Kobe doesn't want Miller, then **** him (I don't think that is the case though, Miller and Kobe, if I recall correctly are great friends and had great chemistry during the team USA games). Miller would make this team absolutely potent because he can stroke it from deep. The opportunities that would be created for Miller with Gasol and Bynum passing out of the post, the doubles they attract, and the doubles Bryant attracts would be phenomenal. Miller would be the best thing this lineup could use. A starting lineup of Fisher, Kobe, Miller, Gasol, and Bynum is easily the best in the league.</div> You know what? That just wouldn't be fair. Which is why it'll probably happen.
Yea, you know, everything recently is going the Lakers way. They're a respectable 3-2 on their roady, they acquired Gasol, I'd say all is pretty well in Laker land. So, why not make it better?
"If a deal comes they can't refuse, I don't expect them not to take it," Mike Miller making an attempt at most negatives in a single sentence. He later said that he would decline to refuse not to comment about his achievement. Chris Wallace would look like an ass if he gave up Miller and Pau in two SEPARATE trades to the same team within a few weeks. Especially if he got robbed in both deals.
This would be another huge addition for the Los Angeles Lakers, a shooter like Miller as a teammate with Gasol/Kobe would get tons of good looks and terrorize teams all night. Also, Miller would most likely be played behind Odom and they would split the 3 rotation, I expect that in a deal for Miller, Walton would most likely be on his way out along with other pieces.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas @ Feb 8 2008, 04:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>This would be another huge addition for the Los Angeles Lakers, a shooter like Miller as a teammate with Gasol/Kobe would get tons of good looks and terrorize teams all night. Also, Miller would most likely be played behind Odom and they would split the 3 rotation, I expect that in a deal for Miller, Walton would most likely be on his way out along with other pieces.</div> I think Odom would be the player traded to acquire him. The scenario I read was Odom for Mike Miller and Brian Cardinal. They might also try to get Miami involved if Memphis doesn't want Odom and would rather take back the expiring contracts of Jason Williams and Ricky Davis.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Shapecity @ Feb 8 2008, 05:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas @ Feb 8 2008, 04:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>This would be another huge addition for the Los Angeles Lakers, a shooter like Miller as a teammate with Gasol/Kobe would get tons of good looks and terrorize teams all night. Also, Miller would most likely be played behind Odom and they would split the 3 rotation, I expect that in a deal for Miller, Walton would most likely be on his way out along with other pieces.</div> I think Odom would be the player traded to acquire him. The scenario I read was Odom for Mike Miller and Brian Cardinal. They might also try to get Miami involved if Memphis doesn't want Odom and would rather take back the expiring contracts of Jason Williams and Ricky Davis. </div> That would be an awesome trade, and could work out really good for all three teams. Memphis gets the expiring contracts they love so much, Lakers get the player they need, and Miami gets Lamar Odom back, who actually played great for them alongside Wade. And everyone's happy...except for whoever's not involved in this trade.
eh, I don't know if I'd be up for that trade. Miller is undoubtedly a great player, but he doesn't possess Lamar's positives and he makes two of the guys on our bench redundant (namely, Sasha and Radmanovic.) I'd stick with Lamar. He's a great rebounder, a better passer, and not as one-dimensional.
Lamar's actually been very efficient the last couple of games, in case you guys didn't notice. Don't get me wrong, I'd definitely deal Lamar if it meant getting Mike Miller, but I still want to see a lineup of Lamar, Gasol, and Bynum in action. The length of that lineup is just scary
Yeah Lamar has actually played pretty good this last two games, I would not mind keeping him but I'll rather have Miller then Odom.