http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/elec...nterstitialskip Don't forget to adjust the sliders at the end. #1) Fred Thompson #2) Mike Gravel #3) Ron Paul Eyeballing it, Kucinich would be #4
#1 - Mike Huckabee #2 - A scary midget #3 - Rudy Giuliani Huckabee was #1 even before I hit that tax reform slider. If there were more social policy questions, Huck would be nowhere near #1.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (o.iatlhawksfan @ Feb 9 2008, 02:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>eww mines was some ugly old guys!</div> lol so everyone except Hilary, Obama, and Huckabee?
It gave me three people I would never vote for and the sliders made it worse. There really weren't enough topic areas for me. Further proof there is no one for me to support in this election
when taking that quiz, I realised how little I care about the "issues." What's more important to me is the decision-making process, how well you are to react to a crisis, whether the policies put in place are a transparent attempt to help your buddies, how much you are trying to shove your religious theology down our throats, how likely you are to put competent, thoughtful people in positions of responsibility, and how well you work with Congress. It's naive to try to describe a solution to Iraq in one sentence; what is clear, however, is that it was completely ineptness and irresponsibility that got us to this place--which again brings me to my opinion that the decision-making process itself is more important than trying to devise "solutions" that are nothing more than sound bites. I don't care one whit about the "immigration crisis," which is a made-up issue meant to draw attention away from the areas that really need attention, like global warming and health care.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Feb 9 2008, 06:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>when taking that quiz, I realised how little I care about the "issues." What's more important to me is the decision-making process, how well you are to react to a crisis, whether the policies put in place are a transparent attempt to help your buddies, how much you are trying to shove your religious theology down our throats, how likely you are to put competent, thoughtful people in positions of responsibility, and how well you work with Congress. It's naive to try to describe a solution to Iraq in one sentence; what is clear, however, is that it was completely ineptness and irresponsibility that got us to this place--which again brings me to my opinion that the decision-making process itself is more important than trying to devise "solutions" that are nothing more than sound bites. I don't care one whit about the "immigration crisis," which is a made-up issue meant to draw attention away from the areas that really need attention, like global warming and health care.</div> http://sportstwo.com/forums/blog-b1-entry554.html
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Feb 9 2008, 10:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Feb 9 2008, 06:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>when taking that quiz, I realised how little I care about the "issues." What's more important to me is the decision-making process, how well you are to react to a crisis, whether the policies put in place are a transparent attempt to help your buddies, how much you are trying to shove your religious theology down our throats, how likely you are to put competent, thoughtful people in positions of responsibility, and how well you work with Congress. It's naive to try to describe a solution to Iraq in one sentence; what is clear, however, is that it was completely ineptness and irresponsibility that got us to this place--which again brings me to my opinion that the decision-making process itself is more important than trying to devise "solutions" that are nothing more than sound bites. I don't care one whit about the "immigration crisis," which is a made-up issue meant to draw attention away from the areas that really need attention, like global warming and health care.</div> http://sportstwo.com/forums/blog-b1-entry554.html </div> Unfortunately, under the current administration, scientific findings by allegedly independent federal agencies have been infected by politics. Is it possible that man has not contributed to global warming? Maybe. I'd much, much rather overreact and be wrong than to do nothing and be wrong and destroy the planet, especially when emissions could be drastically reduced simply by changing the fuels that we use and giving cows some chewing gum.
Unfortunately, scientific findings (in the USA) for 60+ years have been infected by politics. That'd be when the atomic scientists got a "conscience" and tried to influence policy over whether they should be used. That giant sucking sound is the taxpayers' money going into the pockets of allegedly independent scientists and the allegedly independent institutions they work for. You don't see the conflict between these two statements? "whether the policies put in place are a transparent attempt to help your buddies" and "scientific findings by allegedly independent federal agencies have been infected by politics" So you'd rather have transparent (or not) policies put in place to help Gore's buddies (about 55% of the scientists). It's a pretty transparent appeal to a certain base of a certain party. If you want to respond to this, do so in my blog please.
My number one guy was Huckabe. Thats who I was thinking of voteing for, but he dont have a snowballs chance to get nominated.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Feb 9 2008, 03:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Unfortunately, scientific findings (in the USA) for 60+ years have been infected by politics. That'd be when the atomic scientists got a "conscience" and tried to influence policy over whether they should be used. That giant sucking sound is the taxpayers' money going into the pockets of allegedly independent scientists and the allegedly independent institutions they work for. You don't see the conflict between these two statements? "whether the policies put in place are a transparent attempt to help your buddies" and "scientific findings by allegedly independent federal agencies have been infected by politics" So you'd rather have transparent (or not) policies put in place to help Gore's buddies (about 55% of the scientists). It's a pretty transparent appeal to a certain base of a certain party. If you want to respond to this, do so in my blog please.</div> I'd appreciate it if you didn't ascribe opinions and viewpoints to me that I haven't expressed. Thanks. However, to keep this back on topic, perhaps I should mention that I was thinking specifically about the FDA when I made that second statement.
Wow. Any other liberals here? 1) Barack Obama 2) Mike Gravel 3) Hillary Clinton Ron Paul was a close 4th
1. Duncan Hunter 2. John McCain 3. Mitt Romney I was for McCain from the beginning. (even before he ran)
