Sam Smith was on AM570 here and said the Nets are working several deals. One is the much talked Miller deal... Miller for DA, Boki & Mags. But says Memphis is asking for the Nets own first round pick. Thorn is trying to include one of the Mavs picks. Memphis is also trying to work the deal to include Cardinal, meaning we would need to throw in additional pieces. He suggests some of the Mavs players we got to make the contracts work. The other deal is with Miami and NY in a convoluted 3 way deal; where Miami ends up with Curry, Hassell (how is that possible already?) and Marcus; Nets get Banks & Parker; NY gets Williams and spare change. Sounds like typical Smith rumors; except for the Memphis part. I tend to believe it... would make sense for Memphis to ask for that; hence Thorn stalling if it's true.
i dont think any of the players we just acquired can be traded salary wise we cant take on cardinal and miller, we dont have the pieces for both we can just do the miller deal and screw it if they want our 1st pick give it to them
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (go nets @ Feb 19 2008, 04:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>i dont think any of the players we just acquired can be traded</div> http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>For two months after receiving the player in trade or claiming him off waivers, if the player is being traded in combination with other players. However, the team is free to trade the player by himself (not packaged with other players) immediately. This restriction applies only to teams over the salary cap. (Also see question number 72 for a special case where players can be traded together in less than two months.)</div> 72 in Coons doesn't talk about shipping out again. Isn't there a time frame where they can be packaged with others (before that 2 month period)? -Petey
thorn should hold out until the grizz accepts the mav's pick, we are rebuilding anyway so mike miller is just someone nice to have as compared to a team trying to be competitive going into the playoffs. if this new group doesn't mesh right away and vc is traded, we'll get a lottery pick and that is more valuable in the rebuilding effort than an $8M shooter. also, the nets are one of the few who have a surplus of picks they can afford to give away...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Petey @ Feb 19 2008, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>For a certain amount of time, you can turn around to ship a player out with others. Swift is past that period. Why the Nets should had waited on that trade. -Petey</div> That isn't true in this version of the CBA. From the moment you acquire a player, they can't be moved with another player for two months
If we put tons of restrictions on it, I'd trade our pick. I really want Mike, I've been complaining for years we don't have a shooter, and now is our chance.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Feb 19 2008, 04:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Petey @ Feb 19 2008, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>For a certain amount of time, you can turn around to ship a player out with others. Swift is past that period. Why the Nets should had waited on that trade. -Petey</div> That isn't true in this version of the CBA. From the moment you acquire a player, they can't be moved with another player for two months </div> Didn't know. Man, that sucks. Was under the impression we could. -Petey
I really hope the Memphis rumor is true. Easily worth a non-lottery first rounder to get Miller, maybe even a low lottery pick since Miller is still only 27. He is exactly what this team needs: a shooter with enough all round game to not make himself a liability in other areas. If Memphis would accept NJ's lottery-protected pick this year, I'd do it in a heartbeat. As for Cardinal, the guy can shoot the long ball. His contract runs for 2 more years after this one, just like Hassell's. But whereas Hassell is owed 8.7M over that time, Cardinal is owed 13.05M. If Memphis would accept a separate trade of Miller for expirings in exchange for us trading Hassell for Cardinal in a second deal straight up -- thus saving Memphis well over 4M over the next two years -- I'd do that as well. I haven't bothered with the math, but we do have a trade exception we could use part of on the Cardinal swap, if necessary.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FOMW @ Feb 19 2008, 05:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I really hope the Memphis rumor is true. Easily worth a non-lottery first rounder to get Miller, maybe even a low lottery pick since Miller is still only 27. He is exactly what this team needs: a shooter with enough all round game to not make himself a liability in other areas. If Memphis would accept NJ's lottery-protected pick this year, I'd do it in a heartbeat. As for Cardinal, the guy can shoot the long ball. His contract runs for 2 more years after this one, just like Hassell's. But whereas Hassell is owed 8.7M over that time, Cardinal is owed 13.05M. If Memphis would accept a separate trade of Miller for expirings in exchange for us trading Hassell for Cardinal in a second deal straight up -- thus saving Memphis well over 4M over the next two years -- I'd do that as well.</div> good stuff - I would do the deal for our pick as well if it is lotto protected.
Considering at lowest we have the 16th pick in the draft...**** it they can have the pick...I want Mike Miller and his jumper on this team pronto.
The pick is too valuable to trade right now, we don't know how well this team will play together. Who knows where this team will end up this season never mind in the next few years. The Nets could be trading a top 5 pick for all they know.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GM3 @ Feb 19 2008, 05:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>The pick is too valuable to trade right now, we don't know how well this team will play together. Who knows where this team will end up this season never mind in the next few years. The Nets could be trading a top 5 pick for all they know.</div> That's why I said "lottery protected". I would even go as far as to make it top 10 protected but nothing beyond that. Miller was the rookie of the year, is a solid, versatile wing that plays hard, and is still only 27. He's worth that much IMO.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FOMW @ Feb 19 2008, 05:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GM3 @ Feb 19 2008, 05:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>The pick is too valuable to trade right now, we don't know how well this team will play together. Who knows where this team will end up this season never mind in the next few years. The Nets could be trading a top 5 pick for all they know.</div> That's why I said "lottery protected". I would even go as far as to make it top 10 protected but nothing beyond that. Miller was the rookie of the year, is a solid, versatile wing that plays hard, and is still only 27. He's worth that much IMO. </div> Seriously...just make it top 10 protected... although I guarantee we make the playoffs.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FOMW @ Feb 19 2008, 05:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I really hope the Memphis rumor is true. Easily worth a non-lottery first rounder to get Miller, maybe even a low lottery pick since Miller is still only 27. He is exactly what this team needs: a shooter with enough all round game to not make himself a liability in other areas. If Memphis would accept NJ's lottery-protected pick this year, I'd do it in a heartbeat. As for Cardinal, the guy can shoot the long ball. His contract runs for 2 more years after this one, just like Hassell's. But whereas Hassell is owed 8.7M over that time, Cardinal is owed 13.05M. If Memphis would accept a separate trade of Miller for expirings in exchange for us trading Hassell for Cardinal in a second deal straight up -- thus saving Memphis well over 4M over the next two years -- I'd do that as well. I haven't bothered with the math, but we do have a trade exception we could use part of on the Cardinal swap, if necessary.</div> Can not combine TE with a player in a trade. So unless we have a TE large enough to take on Cardinal, that deal would not work. -Petey
I wouldnt be surprised if there was another trade, but I would be very surprised if it's Carter or Jefferson. I could see the Nets trying for someone like Gerald Green or J.J. Redick with one of those players, sending a pick and a TE. Miller sounds awfully complicated. Brian Cardinal? Please. And by the way, $3 million in cash could come in very handy as well. The Nets shipped out $1.5 million to the Hornets to take Ilic and Robinson off our hands...and paid Gill and Thomas $200K. So maybe Ratner will let the team use the remainder to sweeten a deal. I cannot believe how much Cuban threw into this trade.
So the Grizz would trade Gasol for the Lakers 1st, but they want our 1st instead of the Mavs for Miller? The Mavs pick is already going to be better than the Lakers pick.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Feb 19 2008, 05:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>So the Grizz would trade Gasol for the Lakers 1st, but they want our 1st instead of the Mavs for Miller? The Mavs pick is already going to be better than the Lakers pick.</div> Thank you.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Feb 19 2008, 05:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>So the Grizz would trade Gasol for the Lakers 1st, but they want our 1st instead of the Mavs for Miller? The Mavs pick is already going to be better than the Lakers pick.</div> Well the Griz also got Crit and another first in the deal Other than a first round pick, the Nets have nothing to offer that tops Crit
