<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 08:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look i have said find a coach that is better than Frank and do it. You will be hardpressed to do it. I have always liked Frank not sure as a head coach but i think he is a very good assistant. Cartwright should be head coach though.</div> before boone got pt you wanted him out of here. </div> I still would't mind to see him go. I dont go around posting video's though that invade people's privacy now do i?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 04:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 08:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look i have said find a coach that is better than Frank and do it. You will be hardpressed to do it. I have always liked Frank not sure as a head coach but i think he is a very good assistant. Cartwright should be head coach though.</div> before boone got pt you wanted him out of here. </div> I still would't mind to see him go. I dont go around posting video's though that invade people's privacy now do i? </div> ************************* public is not private, go back to school
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 04:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 08:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look i have said find a coach that is better than Frank and do it. You will be hardpressed to do it. I have always liked Frank not sure as a head coach but i think he is a very good assistant. Cartwright should be head coach though.</div> before boone got pt you wanted him out of here. </div> I still would't mind to see him go. I dont go around posting video's though that invade people's privacy now do i? </div> ******************************** public is not private, go back to school </div> I said nothing about any player in this thread. What you said makes no sense? Does Frank know that this is posted on youtube? Did you get his Ok to do that?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 04:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 08:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look i have said find a coach that is better than Frank and do it. You will be hardpressed to do it. I have always liked Frank not sure as a head coach but i think he is a very good assistant. Cartwright should be head coach though.</div> before boone got pt you wanted him out of here. </div> I still would't mind to see him go. I dont go around posting video's though that invade people's privacy now do i? </div> ******************************** public is not private, go back to school </div> I said nothing about any player in this thread. What you said makes no sense? Does Frank know that this is posted on youtube? Did you get his Ok to do that? </div> For the sake of ending this silly argument: Josh_Boone, did you ask my permission befeore you decided to use the original piece of work I created in your sig? No? Kthxbye
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Mar 4 2008, 05:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 04:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 08:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look i have said find a coach that is better than Frank and do it. You will be hardpressed to do it. I have always liked Frank not sure as a head coach but i think he is a very good assistant. Cartwright should be head coach though.</div> before boone got pt you wanted him out of here. </div> I still would't mind to see him go. I dont go around posting video's though that invade people's privacy now do i? </div> ******************************** public is not private, go back to school </div> I said nothing about any player in this thread. What you said makes no sense? Does Frank know that this is posted on youtube? Did you get his Ok to do that? </div> For the sake of ending this silly argument: Josh_Boone, did you ask my permission befeore you decided to use the original piece of work I created in your sig? No? Kthxbye </div> Little diffrent. Taking your sign is not a invasion of privacy. You put it out there to be taken, therefore it was ok'd in a sense by you. Filming people and then posting it on youtube is a diffrent story, and one that is can lead to leagl action.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Mar 4 2008, 05:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 04:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 08:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look i have said find a coach that is better than Frank and do it. You will be hardpressed to do it. I have always liked Frank not sure as a head coach but i think he is a very good assistant. Cartwright should be head coach though.</div> before boone got pt you wanted him out of here. </div> I still would't mind to see him go. I dont go around posting video's though that invade people's privacy now do i? </div> ******************************** public is not private, go back to school </div> I said nothing about any player in this thread. What you said makes no sense? Does Frank know that this is posted on youtube? Did you get his Ok to do that? </div> For the sake of ending this silly argument: Josh_Boone, did you ask my permission befeore you decided to use the original piece of work I created in your sig? No? Kthxbye </div> Little diffrent. Taking your sign is not a invasion of privacy. You put it out there to be taken, therefore it was ok'd in a sense by you. Filming people and then posting it on youtube is a diffrent story, and one that is can lead to leagl action. </div> How do you know I put it there to be taken. Doesn't Frank put himself out the same way by appearing public and working for a team who's job it is to play basketball and entertain fans? Oh and what law, pray tell is someone breaking the law? Copyright Infrigement? LOL. Or maybe a 10-82? So much for ending this argument quickly :-\
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Mar 4 2008, 05:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Mar 4 2008, 05:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 04:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 08:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look i have said find a coach that is better than Frank and do it. You will be hardpressed to do it. I have always liked Frank not sure as a head coach but i think he is a very good assistant. Cartwright should be head coach though.</div> before boone got pt you wanted him out of here. </div> I still would't mind to see him go. I dont go around posting video's though that invade people's privacy now do i? </div> ******************************** public is not private, go back to school </div> I said nothing about any player in this thread. What you said makes no sense? Does Frank know that this is posted on youtube? Did you get his Ok to do that? </div> For the sake of ending this silly argument: Josh_Boone, did you ask my permission befeore you decided to use the original piece of work I created in your sig? No? Kthxbye </div> Little diffrent. Taking your sign is not a invasion of privacy. You put it out there to be taken, therefore it was ok'd in a sense by you. Filming people and then posting it on youtube is a diffrent story, and one that is can lead to leagl action. </div> How do you know I put it there to be taken. Doesn't Frank put himself out the same way by appearing public and working for a team who's job it is to play basketball and entertain fans? Oh and what law, pray tell is someone breaking the law? Copyright Infrigement? LOL. Or maybe a 10-82? So much for ending this argument quickly :-\ </div> Whatever I am not going to aruge with you on this. This is a nets Board and for fans to talk about the nets not me giving you the basic of Laws. I am sure someone in the Law enforcment end could do something with this. However I am not going to take time out for this crap.
What are the basic of Laws? They must be the secret laws that say you're not allowed to take pictures of people and post them ...and the paparazzi don't exist. hahaha
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Mar 4 2008, 05:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>What are the basic of Laws? They must be the secret laws that say you're not allowed to take pictures of people and post them ...and the paparazzi don't exist. hahaha</div> I am not going to ingage in a topic that should be in the OT thread. There is the invasion of privacy, and one could make that Point. I refuse to ingage in anything more about legal action.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Mar 4 2008, 05:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>What are the basic of Laws? They must be the secret laws that say you're not allowed to take pictures of people and post them ...and the paparazzi don't exist. hahaha</div> I am not going to ingage in a topic that should be in the OT thread. There is the invasion of privacy, and one could make that Point. I refuse to ingage in anything more about legal action. </div> Boone was asked a question, he chose to answer it, that's his choice. I think you're just mad because you got exposed to not being his boy like you made it out to be. the Kobe thing was the same situation, the whole cellphone video saying to ship out bynum for kidd, nothing happend.
First question: How is it illegal to post a video a on youtube of non copyrighted media? As Frank is over the age of 18, no consent is required.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheKidHypno @ Mar 4 2008, 05:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh_Boone @ Mar 4 2008, 05:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Mar 4 2008, 05:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>What are the basic of Laws? They must be the secret laws that say you're not allowed to take pictures of people and post them ...and the paparazzi don't exist. hahaha</div> I am not going to ingage in a topic that should be in the OT thread. There is the invasion of privacy, and one could make that Point. I refuse to ingage in anything more about legal action. </div> Boone was asked a question, he chose to answer it, that's his choice. I think you're just mad because you got exposed to not being his boy like you made it out to be. the Kobe thing was the same situation, the whole cellphone video saying to ship out bynum for kidd, nothing happend. </div> I am not pissed about that. The word was taken out of complex.Mostly everyone knows that. My local proscutor's office was going to take action on that video however the video was removed.
For the record, there is a derivative of the right to privacy known as the right to publicity, though it's generally governed by state law. However, that's not the issue here, and isn't a valid topic for Nets board discussion. As has already been said, take any legal notions to an OT thread, or better yet, the Off-Topic section of the site.
I glanced at the theories in the thread in question, and am still not sure what legal claims anyone is talking about.
Hehehe, now my comments make even less sense than before. Still not sure what legal claims are really at issue though, even setting aside the fact that Frank's right to privacy/publicity is his own, and any infringements on such are not actionable by any of us...
Invasion of privacy is a legal term essentially defined as the unlawful intrusion into the personal life of another person without just cause and includes a non-public person's right to privacy from: a) intrusion into solitude or into private affairs; public disclosure of embarrassing private information; c) publicity which puts him/her in a false light to the public; d) appropriation of a person's name or picture for another person's gain or commercial advantage.[1] The right to privacy is the right of a person to be secluded and not seen, heard, or disturbed and involves freedom from observation, intrusion, or attention unless there is a "reasonable' public interest in personal activities, the right to stop police and other government agents from searching person or property except when there is "probable cause", the freedom to make certain decisions about our own personal bodies and private lives without interference from the government, and protected in the due process clause of the 14th amendment of the United States Constititution, the right to privacy regarding family, marriage, motherhood, procreation, and child rearing.[2] However, public figures have less privacy, and this is an evolving area of law as it relates to the media. [edit] Development of the doctrine In the United States, the development of the doctrine regarding this tort was largely spurred by an 1890 Harvard Law Review article written by Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis on The Right of Privacy. Modern tort law gives four categories of invasion of privacy:[3] Intrusion of solitude - physical or electronic intrusion into one's private quarters. Public disclosure of private facts -- the dissemination of truthful private information which a reasonable person would find objectionable False light - the publication of facts which place a person in a false light, even though the facts themselves may not be defamatory. Appropriation -- the unauthorized use of a person's name or likeness to obtain some benefits. In the United States, the development of the doctrine regarding this tort was largely spurred by an 1890 Harvard Law Review article written by Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis on The Right of Privacy. Modern tort law gives four categories of invasion of privacy:[3] Intrusion of solitude - physical or electronic intrusion into one's private quarters. Public disclosure of private facts -- the dissemination of truthful private information which a reasonable person would find objectionable False light - the publication of facts which place a person in a false light, even though the facts themselves may not be defamatory. Appropriation -- the unauthorized use of a person's name or likeness to obtain some benefits. [edit] Intrusion of solitude Intrusion of solitude occurs where one person exposes another to unwarranted publicity. In a famous case from 1944, author Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings was sued by Zelma Cason, who was portrayed as a character in Rawlings' acclaimed memoir, Cross Creek.[4] The Florida Supreme Court held that a cause of action for invasion of privacy was supported by the facts of the case, but in a later proceeding found that there were no actual damages. [edit] Intrusion upon seclusion Intrusion upon seclusion occurs when a perpetrator intentionally intrudes, physically, electronically, or otherwise, upon the private space, solitude, or seclusion of a person, or the private affairs or concerns of a person, by use of the perpetrator's physical senses or by electronic device or devices to oversee or overhear the person's private affairs, or by some other form of investigation, examination, or observation intrude upon a person's private matters if the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. Hacking a computer is an example of intrusion upon privacy.[5] In determining whether intrusion has occurred, one of three main considerations may be involved: expectation of privacy; whether there was an intrusion, invitation, or exceedance of invitation; or deception, misrepresentation, or fraud to gain admission. Intrusion is “an information-gathering, not a publication, tort…legal wrong occurs at the time of the intrusion. No publication is necessary.” [6] [edit] Public disclosure Public disclosure of private facts arises where one person reveals information which is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person[7]. "Unlike libel or slander, truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy."[8] Disclosure of private facts includes publishing or widespread dissemination of little-known, private facts that are non-newsworthy, not part of public records, public proceedings, not of public interest, and would be offensive to a reasonable person if made public.[9] [edit] False light Main article: False light False light is a legal term that refers to a tort concerning privacy that is similar to the tort of defamation. For example, the privacy laws in the United States include a non-public person's right to privacy from publicity which puts them in a false light to the public; which is balanced against the First Amendment right of free speech. False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[10] If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is not technically false but is still misleading then a tort of false light might have occurred.[10] The specific elements of the Tort of FALSE LIGHT vary considerably even among those jurisdictions which do recognize this Tort. Generally, these elements consist of the following: A publication by the Defendant about the Plaintiff; made with actual malice (very similar to that type required by New York Times v. Sullivan in "Defamation" cases); which places the Plaintiff in a false light; AND that would be highly offensive (i.e., embarrassing to reasonable persons).[10] [edit] Appropriation of name or likeness Main article: Personality rights Although this is a common-law tort, most states have enacted statutes that prohibit the use of a person’s name or image if used without consent for the commercial benefit of another person. Appropriation of name or likeness occurs when a person uses the name or likeness of another person for personal gain or commercial advantage. Action for misappropriation of right of publicity protects a person against loss caused by appropriation of personal likeness for commercial exploitation. A person's exclusive rights to control his or her name and likeness to prevent others from exploiting without permission is protected in similar manner to a trademark action with the person's likeness, rather than the trademark, being the subject of the protection. [11] Appropriation is the oldest recognized form of invasion of privacy involving the use of an individual’s name, likeness or identity without consent for purposes such as ads, fictional works, or products.[12] "The same action — appropriation —can violate either an individual’s right of privacy or right of publicity. Conceptually, however, the two rights differ."[13] [edit] Privacy and the United States Constitution Invasion of privacy is a commonly used cause of action in a legal pleading. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States ensures that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The amendment, however, only protects against searches and seizures conducted by the government. Invasions of privacy by persons who are not state actors must be dealt with under private tort law. A notable quote regarding the United States Constitution and privacy in the case of Dietemann v. Time Inc. (9th Cir. 1971): “The First Amendment has never been construed to accord newsmen immunity from torts or crimes committed during the course of newsgathering. The First Amendment is not a license to trespass, to steal, or to intrude by electronic means into the precincts of another’s home or office.”[
