<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Mar 5 2008, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Both states combined won't push either candidate over the top (enough votes to win the nomination). They SHOULD redo the votes so people get to exercise their right to vote. Tho they already did vote. Can't take that back.</div> They should and they will, I have not heard any real reason to think otherwise. And I've said before that Obama is full of shit as well (no duh so is anyone that runs for this race), some people just don't follow my posts very carefully. I don't buy everything he says, but he's my candidate this cycle. </div> Okay so my bad for not memorizing all your posts? Cause I have time to do that? I'm just saying people give her a lot of flack when Obama is even more full of shit. </div> First, you need to stop generalizing me with whatever pussy ass Obama supporter you know in real life. How do you even know he's more full of shit? I'd like to hear that case. And even if he was, he wants the nominee to win fairly. </div> Tony Rezko. Obama's connection to subprime mortgage sharks. One of his campaign people in California was giving out fliers telling republicans to register as democrats for a day to stop Clinton. He's been talking shit about her for over a year now in her stump speeches and when she finally attacks him he tries to look all innocent. He talks about giving kids health care in Illinois when it was a subdivision of CHIP. He didn't do anything for the innercities in Chicago. When it was time to vote for Iran, he didn't have the time to stop campaigning there when Hillary did -- and then he attacks her for voting that way. The whole Canada/NAFTA thing. There's a lot of shit he has done that has been going completely against the whole 'politics of hope' he preaches. </div> She's been saying that he was not 100% Pro-Choice, and he was. She says he waffled on the war, he didn't, you just don't send troops out to die because you won't give them armor. She has connections to the same slumlord, she's had to return more money because of shitty people she knows, she was in White water, she's said offensive stuff to Jewish people directly from her mouth. She has the same BS views on Nafta, and lied about not supporting it in a direct quote in 2004. </div> He has changed positions on the war. You can find the video on youtube probably where he says he would have conducted the war the same Bush would. Clinton supported giving the troops armor, Obama didn't. She does not have connections to Rezko. Okay so she returned money cause of people she knows, then why doesn't Obama return the hundreds of thousands Rezko helped him raise? She was in White Water? Are you serious? That was nothing! They investigated that throughout Clinton's entire presidency basically. There's nothing there.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Mar 5 2008, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Both states combined won't push either candidate over the top (enough votes to win the nomination). They SHOULD redo the votes so people get to exercise their right to vote. Tho they already did vote. Can't take that back.</div> They should and they will, I have not heard any real reason to think otherwise. And I've said before that Obama is full of shit as well (no duh so is anyone that runs for this race), some people just don't follow my posts very carefully. I don't buy everything he says, but he's my candidate this cycle. </div> Okay so my bad for not memorizing all your posts? Cause I have time to do that? I'm just saying people give her a lot of flack when Obama is even more full of shit. </div> First, you need to stop generalizing me with whatever pussy ass Obama supporter you know in real life. How do you even know he's more full of shit? I'd like to hear that case. And even if he was, he wants the nominee to win fairly. </div> Tony Rezko. Obama's connection to subprime mortgage sharks. One of his campaign people in California was giving out fliers telling republicans to register as democrats for a day to stop Clinton. He's been talking shit about her for over a year now in her stump speeches and when she finally attacks him he tries to look all innocent. He talks about giving kids health care in Illinois when it was a subdivision of CHIP. He didn't do anything for the innercities in Chicago. When it was time to vote for Iran, he didn't have the time to stop campaigning there when Hillary did -- and then he attacks her for voting that way. The whole Canada/NAFTA thing. There's a lot of shit he has done that has been going completely against the whole 'politics of hope' he preaches. </div> She's been saying that he was not 100% Pro-Choice, and he was. She says he waffled on the war, he didn't, you just don't send troops out to die because you won't give them armor. She has connections to the same slumlord, she's had to return more money because of shitty people she knows, she was in White water, she's said offensive stuff to Jewish people directly from her mouth. She has the same BS views on Nafta, and lied about not supporting it in a direct quote in 2004. She refuses to release her tax returns. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Mar 5 2008, 11:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Al Gore didn't want to win fairly. He wanted to recount votes in 3 counties that were 85% democratic voters, hoping that a few hundred votes might turn out in his favor. He's a politician! So is Obama. So is Hillary. So is McCain. I doubt any of them have that much honor that they'd just give up if there's a chance to win. Especially after going through all they've been through (this time, many months of campaigning till you drop).</div> Who the **** said I like Al Gore? We do know for certain who wants to **** with us though. Bringing in other people into her class is plausible but not verifiable. Plus she's said Anti-Semitic remarks. </div> No one said you like Al Gore. May I ask, who do you support? Bringing in other people into her class? What are you talking about? What Anti-Semitic remarks? </div> Alot of her security guards said she talks shit like that. You don't hear rumors like that about Obama either. </div> Security guards? Okay. Act like everybody isn't looking for a payoff. Remember those troopers when Clinton was running for president? They all admitted they made that shit up.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MyNetsForLife @ Mar 5 2008, 11:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>[Comedic relief] And her husband got a blow from an employee! [/Comedic relief]</div> lmao
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Mar 5 2008, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Both states combined won't push either candidate over the top (enough votes to win the nomination). They SHOULD redo the votes so people get to exercise their right to vote. Tho they already did vote. Can't take that back.</div> They should and they will, I have not heard any real reason to think otherwise. And I've said before that Obama is full of shit as well (no duh so is anyone that runs for this race), some people just don't follow my posts very carefully. I don't buy everything he says, but he's my candidate this cycle. </div> Okay so my bad for not memorizing all your posts? Cause I have time to do that? I'm just saying people give her a lot of flack when Obama is even more full of shit. </div> First, you need to stop generalizing me with whatever pussy ass Obama supporter you know in real life. How do you even know he's more full of shit? I'd like to hear that case. And even if he was, he wants the nominee to win fairly. </div> Tony Rezko. Obama's connection to subprime mortgage sharks. One of his campaign people in California was giving out fliers telling republicans to register as democrats for a day to stop Clinton. He's been talking shit about her for over a year now in her stump speeches and when she finally attacks him he tries to look all innocent. He talks about giving kids health care in Illinois when it was a subdivision of CHIP. He didn't do anything for the innercities in Chicago. When it was time to vote for Iran, he didn't have the time to stop campaigning there when Hillary did -- and then he attacks her for voting that way. The whole Canada/NAFTA thing. There's a lot of shit he has done that has been going completely against the whole 'politics of hope' he preaches. </div> She's been saying that he was not 100% Pro-Choice, and he was. She says he waffled on the war, he didn't, you just don't send troops out to die because you won't give them armor. She has connections to the same slumlord, she's had to return more money because of shitty people she knows, she was in White water, she's said offensive stuff to Jewish people directly from her mouth. She has the same BS views on Nafta, and lied about not supporting it in a direct quote in 2004. </div> He has changed positions on the war. You can find the video on youtube probably where he says he would have conducted the war the same Bush would. Clinton supported giving the troops armor, Obama didn't. She does not have connections to Rezko. Okay so she returned money cause of people she knows, then why doesn't Obama return the hundreds of thousands Rezko helped him raise? She was in White Water? Are you serious? That was nothing! They investigated that throughout Clinton's entire presidency basically. There's nothing there. </div> I could say Rezco was nothing, he returned 80,000 dollars, 1/10th of what Hillary had to give back. No he had to support the war once Bush brought us there. He's also voted basically the same way as Hillary to support the troops as well. Denny just posted an article about the Clintons and Rezko. Hillary said he loved Reagen, and she's an annoying person simply with her thoughts on Michigan. She's got a lot to hide in her tax returns, and she wanted to steal pledged delegates from Obama that he won in primaries.
Actually, she does have connections to Rezko. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/25/t...of_n_83232.html Today Show Finds Photo Of Clintons With Disgraced Obama Supporter Clinton in all three network morning show interviews stayed briskly on message, focusing on standing up to the Republicans and solving problems. On NBC, Lauer showed an undated picture of the Clintons with Obama's controversial donor Tony Rezko; she said she didn't know him or have a seventeen-year relationship with him. Click above to watch. (Editor's question: Where did "Today" get that picture?) Response from the Clinton campaign: "Tony Rezko has never contributed a dime to Hillary or Bill Clinton. They have no relationship with Tony Rezko." See here as well: http://berniehund.com/2008/03/04/obama-rez...mccain-keating/ Who is Norman Hsu? Johnny Chung? John Huang? Bernard Schwartz? Oh boy, I'm just scratching the surface.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Mar 5 2008, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Both states combined won't push either candidate over the top (enough votes to win the nomination). They SHOULD redo the votes so people get to exercise their right to vote. Tho they already did vote. Can't take that back.</div> They should and they will, I have not heard any real reason to think otherwise. And I've said before that Obama is full of shit as well (no duh so is anyone that runs for this race), some people just don't follow my posts very carefully. I don't buy everything he says, but he's my candidate this cycle. </div> Okay so my bad for not memorizing all your posts? Cause I have time to do that? I'm just saying people give her a lot of flack when Obama is even more full of shit. </div> First, you need to stop generalizing me with whatever pussy ass Obama supporter you know in real life. How do you even know he's more full of shit? I'd like to hear that case. And even if he was, he wants the nominee to win fairly. </div> Tony Rezko. Obama's connection to subprime mortgage sharks. One of his campaign people in California was giving out fliers telling republicans to register as democrats for a day to stop Clinton. He's been talking shit about her for over a year now in her stump speeches and when she finally attacks him he tries to look all innocent. He talks about giving kids health care in Illinois when it was a subdivision of CHIP. He didn't do anything for the innercities in Chicago. When it was time to vote for Iran, he didn't have the time to stop campaigning there when Hillary did -- and then he attacks her for voting that way. The whole Canada/NAFTA thing. There's a lot of shit he has done that has been going completely against the whole 'politics of hope' he preaches. </div> She's been saying that he was not 100% Pro-Choice, and he was. She says he waffled on the war, he didn't, you just don't send troops out to die because you won't give them armor. She has connections to the same slumlord, she's had to return more money because of shitty people she knows, she was in White water, she's said offensive stuff to Jewish people directly from her mouth. She has the same BS views on Nafta, and lied about not supporting it in a direct quote in 2004. She refuses to release her tax returns. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Mar 5 2008, 11:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Al Gore didn't want to win fairly. He wanted to recount votes in 3 counties that were 85% democratic voters, hoping that a few hundred votes might turn out in his favor. He's a politician! So is Obama. So is Hillary. So is McCain. I doubt any of them have that much honor that they'd just give up if there's a chance to win. Especially after going through all they've been through (this time, many months of campaigning till you drop).</div> Who the **** said I like Al Gore? We do know for certain who wants to **** with us though. Bringing in other people into her class is plausible but not verifiable. Plus she's said Anti-Semitic remarks. </div> No one said you like Al Gore. May I ask, who do you support? Bringing in other people into her class? What are you talking about? What Anti-Semitic remarks? </div> Alot of her security guards said she talks shit like that. You don't hear rumors like that about Obama either. </div> Security guards? Okay. Act like everybody isn't looking for a payoff. Remember those troopers when Clinton was running for president? They all admitted they made that shit up. </div> Just a cherry on top if it were true. Doesn't matter.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Mar 5 2008, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Both states combined won't push either candidate over the top (enough votes to win the nomination). They SHOULD redo the votes so people get to exercise their right to vote. Tho they already did vote. Can't take that back.</div> They should and they will, I have not heard any real reason to think otherwise. And I've said before that Obama is full of shit as well (no duh so is anyone that runs for this race), some people just don't follow my posts very carefully. I don't buy everything he says, but he's my candidate this cycle. </div> Okay so my bad for not memorizing all your posts? Cause I have time to do that? I'm just saying people give her a lot of flack when Obama is even more full of shit. </div> First, you need to stop generalizing me with whatever pussy ass Obama supporter you know in real life. How do you even know he's more full of shit? I'd like to hear that case. And even if he was, he wants the nominee to win fairly. </div> Tony Rezko. Obama's connection to subprime mortgage sharks. One of his campaign people in California was giving out fliers telling republicans to register as democrats for a day to stop Clinton. He's been talking shit about her for over a year now in her stump speeches and when she finally attacks him he tries to look all innocent. He talks about giving kids health care in Illinois when it was a subdivision of CHIP. He didn't do anything for the innercities in Chicago. When it was time to vote for Iran, he didn't have the time to stop campaigning there when Hillary did -- and then he attacks her for voting that way. The whole Canada/NAFTA thing. There's a lot of shit he has done that has been going completely against the whole 'politics of hope' he preaches. </div> She's been saying that he was not 100% Pro-Choice, and he was. She says he waffled on the war, he didn't, you just don't send troops out to die because you won't give them armor. She has connections to the same slumlord, she's had to return more money because of shitty people she knows, she was in White water, she's said offensive stuff to Jewish people directly from her mouth. She has the same BS views on Nafta, and lied about not supporting it in a direct quote in 2004. </div> He has changed positions on the war. You can find the video on youtube probably where he says he would have conducted the war the same Bush would. Clinton supported giving the troops armor, Obama didn't. She does not have connections to Rezko. Okay so she returned money cause of people she knows, then why doesn't Obama return the hundreds of thousands Rezko helped him raise? She was in White Water? Are you serious? That was nothing! They investigated that throughout Clinton's entire presidency basically. There's nothing there. </div> I could say Rezco was nothing, he returned 80,000 dollars, 1/10th of what Hillary had to give back. No he had to support the war once Bush brought us there. He's also voted basically the same way as Hillary to support the troops as well. Denny just posted an article about the Clintons and Rezko. Hillary said he loved Reagen, and she's an annoying person simply with her thoughts on Michigan. She's got a lot to hide in her tax returns, and she wanted to steal pledged delegates from Obama. </div> No, White Water was nothing. All investigations came up with nothing. That will not be true with Rezco. Rezco is a criminal. The subprime mortgage sharks he has connections to are criminals. Rezko raised more money than that for Obama. Hillary gave back every penny. He had to support the war when Bush brought us there? Obama said the quote in the midst of the 04 election, when one of the biggest issues was the Iraq war. Kerry wanted to get out. Clinton never said he loved Reagen. She said he loved republican ideas. Tax returns? She already said they will be released in April. Obama's campaign is looking to steal pledged delegates too. Anyway, you can respond back but I probably won't look at it tonight. I have to write a paper. I didn't mean to start an argument over everything. No hard feelings. I'll talk to you later.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No, White Water was nothing. All investigations came up with nothing. That will not be true with Rezco. Rezco is a criminal. The subprime mortgage sharks he has connections to are criminals. Rezko raised more money than that for Obama. Hillary gave back every penny.</div> Obama gave back every dirty penny too. He had less to deal with as well. She's given back 800,000. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>He had to support the war when Bush brought us there? Obama said the quote in the midst of the 04 election, when one of the biggest issues was the Iraq war. Kerry wanted to get out.</div> Once the troops are there, we have to try to prevent a Rwanda-like situation. At least in the beginning. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Clinton never said he loved Reagen. She said he loved republican ideas.</div> Even worse for the <u>Democratic</u> nominee. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Tax returns? She already said they will be released in April.</div> To stall as long as she can. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Obama's campaign is looking to steal pledged delegates too. Anyway, you can respond back but I probably won't look at it tonight. I have to write a paper. I didn't mean to start an argument over everything. No hard feelings. I'll talk to you later.</div> Clinton was more actively pursuing it according to what MSNBC said. And if you don't want any hard feelings, you shouldn't start cursing randomly. Denny doesn't do that for example. So they're both dirty, and? How's he more dirty? She constantly misquotes him as well. I know which one is more annoying to the majority of people under 50 years of age. I can hate on her all I want, she's a clown for her antics with Michigan.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No, White Water was nothing. All investigations came up with nothing. That will not be true with Rezco. Rezco is a criminal. The subprime mortgage sharks he has connections to are criminals. Rezko raised more money than that for Obama. Hillary gave back every penny.</div> Obama gave back every dirty penny too. He had less to deal with as well. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>He had to support the war when Bush brought us there? Obama said the quote in the midst of the 04 election, when one of the biggest issues was the Iraq war. Kerry wanted to get out.</div> Once the troops are there, we have to try to prevent a Rwanda-like situation. At least in the beginning. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Clinton never said he loved Reagen. She said he loved republican ideas.</div> Even worse for the <u>Democratic</u> nominee. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Tax returns? She already said they will be released in April.</div> To stall as long as she can. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Obama's campaign is looking to steal pledged delegates too. Anyway, you can respond back but I probably won't look at it tonight. I have to write a paper. I didn't mean to start an argument over everything. No hard feelings. I'll talk to you later.</div> Clinton was more actively pursuing it. And if you don't want any hard feelings, you shouldn't start cursing randomly. Denny doesn't do that for example. </div> Well I didn't see the Rezko photo until just now so I guess I need to research it. But yeah. A picture doesn't necessarily mean they even know each other. I have a picture with Obama. I also have one with Edwards, the Clintons, Kucinich, etc.. If I end up being a slumlord, it could be used against all of them? True there could be more to it. Releasing them in April isn't stalling as long as she can. They aren't mandated to do so until much later. Obama has less dirty money to deal with but he also hasn't been in politics for over thirty years. I shouldn't have cursed but I got instantly angry when I saw what you posted. You called her a ****ing clown but that's no excuse for my behavior.
Obama said the republicans were the party of ideas. This is far different from saying he liked the ideas. This is true. Name one big idea from the democrats in the past 12 years that's new! There's a challenge Whitewater was nothing? Hundreds of people probably went to jail over it, including the #2 man in the Clinton justice dept and former partner of Hillary's at Rose Law Firm. I don't confuse dozens of guys taking the fall for Clinton with him being innocent. Regardless of what the special investigator concluded (after there was clear obstruction of justice, no wonder!). Oh yeah, Clinton was disbarred by the state of Arkansas and by the US Supreme Court and settled with Paula Jones for $900K or so. But nah, he's not guilty. Right. Neither candidate makes me happy with their pledge to withdraw troops. It will be a Rwanda situation and they don't give a shit as long as they win an election because of the promise. And she was a huge part of it all, remember her billing records?
<div><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tzu_DsVJVPI&"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tzu_DsVJVPI&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350" /></embed></object></div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Mar 6 2008, 12:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'> <div><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tzu_DsVJVPI&"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tzu_DsVJVPI&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350" /></embed></object></div></div> That's ****ing hilarious. Bravo Denny.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not scared of Al Qaeda or anything like that. What I am scared of is: 1) Republican SCOTUS nominees reversing Roe 2) Losing my house due to the mortgage crisis 3) Getting old and my social security not being there 4) The ice caps melting and flooding my house 5) Illegal immigrants taking my job 6) My job going overseas 7) Republicans killing the dept. of education 8) Nativity scene on city hall lawn means I have to become a Christian 9) That increasing medicare funding by only 10% a year means senior citizens will die from lack of health care My bad. I'm not scared of any of those things.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/20..._obama-225.html RCP Average Obama (D) 44.6% McCain ® 46.0% Und 5.8% McCain +1.4% http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/20..._obama-244.html Pennsylvania RCP Average Obama (D) 42.4% McCain ® 44.6% Und 10.8% McCain +2.2% http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/20..._obama-400.html Ohio RCP Average Obama (D) 44.8% McCain ® 45.5% Und 9.5% McCain +0.7% http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/20..._obama-418.html Florida RCP Average Obama (D) 41.0% McCain ® 47.8% Und 11.3% McCain +6.8% Whoever wins 2 of those 3 states....
Obama has tied Clinton in many polls and even leads again according to MSNBC. The backlash was due because of the Wright hype, but it's definitely died down after his speech. Polls in her favor or not, she's still done.
