Sixth Man Award

Discussion in 'NBA General' started by ghoti, Apr 12, 2008.

  1. ghoti

    ghoti A PhD in Horribleness

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,516
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    This award is not meant to reward All-Stars like Manu Ginobili.

    It's designed to give recognition to a key bench player who contributed the most to his team.

    There needs to be a minutes cap on this award. Right now it's meaningless.
     
  2. Dark Defender

    Dark Defender The Dark Passenger

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Part-Time Intern, Full Time Student
    Location:
    Jersey
    I don't see anything wrong with Ginobili winning it, yeah he plays a lot of minutes but the team performs better with him off the bench.
     
  3. ghoti

    ghoti A PhD in Horribleness

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,516
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It's because he's not a bench player.

    He's an All-Star and one of the best players in the NBA.

    It's meaningless to recognize him as a "sixth man" when he is easily his team's second best player and plays the third most minutes.

    What is the point of giving a guy an award for that?

    I think the award would mean more if it recognized a true bench player that was a key to his team's success. Someone like Jason Maxiell, Josh Childress or Kyle Korver.

    I think the award was meant to recognize players like those.
     
  4. Real

    Real Dumb and Dumbest

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    On the other hand, if you give it to a Maxiell, Childress, or Korver, people who know basketball will look at Manu and think he got robbed.

    In a way it's a lot like the MVP debate, where we argue whether we give to the player who's team had the best year, or the best player of the year. With the Sixth man, we argue whether or not it matters an All-Star like Manu got it, or we should give it to a non-all-star quality player who performs exceptionally.
     
  5. ghoti

    ghoti A PhD in Horribleness

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,516
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Real @ Apr 21 2008, 06:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>On the other hand, if you give it to a Maxiell, Childress, or Korver, people who know basketball will look at Manu and think he got robbed.</div>

    Ergo, my suggestion of a minutes cap.
     
  6. Answer_AI03

    Answer_AI03 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,428
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    ya, pretty much the same thing as bringing in Redd, Jason Richardson, or Baron Davis off the bench and having them win 6th man. This just makes me hate Ginobli that much more.
     
  7. Денг Гордон

    Денг Гордон Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbia, MO
    It ended up finishing with:

    1. Ginobli (99.2%)
    2. Barbosa (45.6%)
    3. Terry (7.1%)
    4. Korver (5.5%)
    5. Gordon (4.4%)

    Ginobli: 18.2 PPG (44.4 FG%) 4.6 RPG 4.0 APG
    Barbosa: 14.7 PPG (44.7 FG%) 2.7 RPG 2.6 APG
    Terry: 14.3 PPG (45.7 FG%) 2.4 RPG 3.0 APG
    Korver: 9.9 PPG (44.4 FG%) 2.3 RPG 1.4 APG
    Gordon: 19.3 PPG (46.7 FG%) 2.6 RPG 3.0 APG

    All things considered, it should have been:

    1. Ginobli
    2. Gordon
    3. Barbosa
    4. Terry

    With Ginobli getting a near majority on the 1st place votes, and Gordon with a near majority on the 2nd place votes.

    At least they got the winner right, but what idiots vote on this?
     

Share This Page