I'm really shocked at the 95 for Moore. I can only wish that he has that type of success this season.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jun 1 2008, 10:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm really shocked at the 95 for Moore. I can only wish that he has that type of success this season.</div> I think that just means thats how he is rated at that specific position, so if you put him at starting RB, or backup, he'd likely be alot less. I could be wrong, although I can't see why he would be rated higher than Willie Parker
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NTC @ Jun 2 2008, 06:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jun 1 2008, 10:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm really shocked at the 95 for Moore. I can only wish that he has that type of success this season.</div> I think that just means thats how he is rated at that specific position, so if you put him at starting RB, or backup, he'd likely be alot less. I could be wrong, although I can't see why he would be rated higher than Willie Parker </div> I get that it is a specific rating for just being a 3rd Down back, but I still don't expect him to be that good or even one of the top 3 or 4 3rd down backs in the NFL.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 1 2008, 12:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Mendenhall = 81 Felix Jones = 80 This just adds fuel to the fire </div> How does this add any fuel to the fire? Its Madden. They have Deon Anderson as a better FB than Crayton as a WR. I have no clue as to what they could base that off of. Anderson started a couple of games last year, as a rookie.....then he went on IR. Crayton had a pretty good year last year (sans the Giants playoff game). Anderson somehow is a better football player than Crayton. Yet, anyone with a clue, knows....that has yet to be determined. A couple years ago they had Anthony Henry rated higher than Newman. Anyone with one iota of common sense knew that was false....but then again, I've always suspected that the Madden makers never really watched football....
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jun 2 2008, 05:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NTC @ Jun 2 2008, 06:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jun 1 2008, 10:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm really shocked at the 95 for Moore. I can only wish that he has that type of success this season.</div> I think that just means thats how he is rated at that specific position, so if you put him at starting RB, or backup, he'd likely be alot less. I could be wrong, although I can't see why he would be rated higher than Willie Parker </div> I get that it is a specific rating for just being a 3rd Down back, but I still don't expect him to be that good or even one of the top 3 or 4 3rd down backs in the NFL. </div> Oh well, it may just be, that it doesnt account to much, in the game. Moore has always had speed of like 97-98 or somthing, so it may have somthing to do with that.
