I am more excited about the #21 than the #10.

We have to get cdr or rush at the 21!

let boki go and have a young gunner come off the bench. CDr is the 1st choice cause he is a good defensive player and seems to be ready to step into that role immediately.

You mention both CDR and Brandon Rush, yet you talk about CDR's defense? wtf??????? are we in bizarro world?

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 13 2008, 08:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>You mention both CDR and Brandon Rush, yet you talk about CDR's defense? wtf??????? are we in bizarro world?</div>
Lmao. There are so many other players that I'm excited about also at #21. For some reason I just get this vibe that the Nets aren't really feelin Rush. Although, it's not like they are trying to let everyone know who they are interested in so who knows.

the nets will probably just sign antoine wright for the minimum as our perimeter defender and "shooter"...is there a chance that joe alexander will fall to #21?

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jirohkanzaki @ Jun 13 2008, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>the nets will probably just sign antoine wright for the minimum as our perimeter defender and "shooter"...is there a chance that joe alexander will fall to #21?</div>

No way at all. He could even go before 10, he's one of those guys who's a workout warrior, and is improving his game, so don't be surprised to see someone take a chance on him very high.

They like Rush more than CDR. That's my impression.

They like Gallinari...but won't commit yet. They like Speights and Arthur, a lot.

They don't like McGee or Robin Lopez.

They like Randolph, Green and Koufos, but only Randolph at 10.

They want to take a look at Jordan but don't expect much.

They are looking at Westbrook...seriously.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NetIncome @ Jun 14 2008, 10:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>They like Rush more than CDR. That's my impression.

They like Gallinari...but won't commit yet. They like Speights and Arthur, a lot.

They don't like McGee or Robin Lopez.

They like Randolph, Green and Koufos, but only Randolph at 10.

They want to take a look at Jordan but don't expect much.

They are looking at Westbrook...seriously.</div>
Definitely the impression they are giving. Not sure how much of that is misinformation.

*crosses fingers for Westbrook*

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 14 2008, 07:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>*crosses fingers for Westbrook*</div>

Keep crossing them, because there is a snowballs chance in hell he lasts to #21. IMHO we take him at #10 if possible and then offer Danilo the #21 pick and see if he bites

He means Westbrook at 10

I'm more excited about the 1st than the 10th or 21st.

I think the lower the number the better, if the pick pans out.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (infinet @ Jun 14 2008, 11:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 14 2008, 07:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>*crosses fingers for Westbrook*</div>

Keep crossing them, because there is a snowballs chance in hell he lasts to #21. IMHO we take him at #10 if possible and then offer Danilo the #21 pick and see if he bites
</div>
I'm seriously doubting that Danilo Gallinari is going to be there for the 21st pick, and there's a chance that he isn't even there for the #10 pick, as New York and D'Antoni is rumored to like Gallinari quite a bit. There is also the chance that the Bucks decide to take him, if he is the best player available, because they just need the best player possible.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (infinet @ Jun 14 2008, 12:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 14 2008, 07:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>*crosses fingers for Westbrook*</div>

Keep crossing them, because there is a snowballs chance in hell he lasts to #21. IMHO we take him at #10 if possible and then offer Danilo the #21 pick and see if he bites
</div>

I never said to take Westrbook at 21. He's my choice at 10.

I know people are buzzing about Danillo, but Westbrook could be a Kevin Johnson/Monta Ellis player. We could do what Detroit might be doing in the future if they trade Rip and make their backcourt Billups/Stuckey.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jirohkanzaki @ Jun 13 2008, 08:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>the nets will probably just sign antoine wright for the minimum as our perimeter defender and "shooter"...is there a chance that joe alexander will fall to #21?</div>

He fell to #22 in our mock draft.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Real @ Jun 14 2008, 02:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I know people are buzzing about Danillo, but Westbrook could be a Kevin Johnson/Monta Ellis player. We could do what Detroit might be doing in the future if they trade Rip and make their backcourt Billups/Stuckey.</div>


Right now I'd say Westbrook could impact our team in a similar fashion to how Monta Ellis plays. If he can extend the range of his jumper though, I see Kerry Kittles.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 14 2008, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Real @ Jun 14 2008, 02:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I know people are buzzing about Danillo, but Westbrook could be a Kevin Johnson/Monta Ellis player. We could do what Detroit might be doing in the future if they trade Rip and make their backcourt Billups/Stuckey.</div>


Right now I'd say Westbrook could impact our team in a similar fashion to how Monta Ellis plays. If he can extend the range of his jumper though, I see Kerry Kittles.
</div>

Kittles? That's a terrible comparison!

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 14 2008, 03:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 14 2008, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Real @ Jun 14 2008, 02:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I know people are buzzing about Danillo, but Westbrook could be a Kevin Johnson/Monta Ellis player. We could do what Detroit might be doing in the future if they trade Rip and make their backcourt Billups/Stuckey.</div>


Right now I'd say Westbrook could impact our team in a similar fashion to how Monta Ellis plays. If he can extend the range of his jumper though, I see Kerry Kittles.
</div>

Kittles? That's a terrible comparison!
</div>

Fast SG who excells in the transition game and is athletic, contingent on Westbrook being more consistent on this 3? I don't see why that's horrible.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 14 2008, 03:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 14 2008, 03:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 14 2008, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Real @ Jun 14 2008, 02:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I know people are buzzing about Danillo, but Westbrook could be a Kevin Johnson/Monta Ellis player. We could do what Detroit might be doing in the future if they trade Rip and make their backcourt Billups/Stuckey.</div>


Right now I'd say Westbrook could impact our team in a similar fashion to how Monta Ellis plays. If he can extend the range of his jumper though, I see Kerry Kittles.
</div>

Kittles? That's a terrible comparison!
</div>

Fast SG who excells in the transition game and is athletic, contingent on Westbrook being more consistent on this 3? I don't see why that's horrible.
</div>

the only thing they have in common is they can both thrive in transition.

westbrook is a much better defender, a premier defender (not that there was really anything wrong with kittles d).

westbrook is a combo guard. kittles was strictly a sg.
kittles was a sniper. westbrook is a slasher.

suck it.

westbrook sucks on offense too.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 14 2008, 04:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 14 2008, 03:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 14 2008, 03:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 14 2008, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Real @ Jun 14 2008, 02:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I know people are buzzing about Danillo, but Westbrook could be a Kevin Johnson/Monta Ellis player. We could do what Detroit might be doing in the future if they trade Rip and make their backcourt Billups/Stuckey.</div>


Right now I'd say Westbrook could impact our team in a similar fashion to how Monta Ellis plays. If he can extend the range of his jumper though, I see Kerry Kittles.
</div>

Kittles? That's a terrible comparison!
</div>

Fast SG who excells in the transition game and is athletic, contingent on Westbrook being more consistent on this 3? I don't see why that's horrible.
</div>

the only thing they have in common is they can both thrive in transition.

westbrook is a much better defender, a premier defender (not that there was really anything wrong with kittles d).

westbrook is a combo guard. kittles was strictly a sg.
kittles was a sniper. westbrook is a slasher.

suck it.
</div>

So they both thrive in transition, they're good defenders, but because Westbrook has better ballhandling and Kittles has more consistency (keep in mind that I said this was Westbrooks best-case-scenario) it's a horrible comparison? Nadda.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Jun 14 2008, 04:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>westbrook sucks on offense too.</div>


whoa no he doesn't.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 14 2008, 04:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 14 2008, 04:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 14 2008, 03:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 14 2008, 03:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Jun 14 2008, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Real @ Jun 14 2008, 02:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I know people are buzzing about Danillo, but Westbrook could be a Kevin Johnson/Monta Ellis player. We could do what Detroit might be doing in the future if they trade Rip and make their backcourt Billups/Stuckey.</div>


Right now I'd say Westbrook could impact our team in a similar fashion to how Monta Ellis plays. If he can extend the range of his jumper though, I see Kerry Kittles.
</div>

Kittles? That's a terrible comparison!
</div>

Fast SG who excells in the transition game and is athletic, contingent on Westbrook being more consistent on this 3? I don't see why that's horrible.
</div>

the only thing they have in common is they can both thrive in transition.

westbrook is a much better defender, a premier defender (not that there was really anything wrong with kittles d).

westbrook is a combo guard. kittles was strictly a sg.
kittles was a sniper. westbrook is a slasher.

suck it.
</div>

So they both thrive in transition, they're good defenders, but because Westbrook has better ballhandling and Kittles has more consistency (keep in mind that I said this was Westbrooks best-case-scenario) it's a horrible comparison? Nadda.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Jun 14 2008, 04:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>westbrook sucks on offense too.</div>


whoa no he doesn't.
</div>

Let's just both agree that "Westbrook sucks on offense" is retard talk.

Kittles was a terrific defender. The Nets in those years were among the top defending teams in the league . . .

well, he can't shoot, he isn't a distributor, and he doesn't get to the line much, he can only really score much on the break. tbh he sounds like a more athletic, smaller Wright.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Jun 14 2008, 04:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Kittles was a terrific defender. The Nets in those years were among the top defending teams in the league . . .</div>

Kittles was a plus defender, but not a premier defender, which is what Westbrook is.

Kittles = good defense.

Westbrook = shutdown defense.