<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jirohkanzaki @ Jun 25 2008, 08:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (danxcr @ Jun 25 2008, 07:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>trading marcus wouldnt be painful at all... and i wouldnt care if we got jack or blake... both are solid back up PG's hmmm but if 10 is gonna be gordon im goin gordon! if its brook... freakin trade it</div> it is only painful because trading marcus iwould leave us with zero backup pgs...gordon looked great at times but erratic at other times...i like how he can get to the ft line and shoot 83% from there... </div> Jack and Blake are both pgs... and better than marcus art this stage.
Update: <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Now, Steve Kyler of HoopsWorld and Jonathan Givony of Draft Express say it’s Marcus Williams and #10 for Jack and #13</div> Nets Daily
i think its good we didn't trade because there is a big step from the people who can fall down to ten then the guys at 13
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>There is at least one contingency deal the Nets are considering with Portland. If they don't get the player they want at 10 -- probably Jerryd Bayless, but that possibility looked less likely last night -- they were prepared to swap picks with Portland at 13. In that case, the Nets would take Robin Lopez and be satisfied.</div> The Star-Ledger
If we draft Rush with #13 I'm not too upset by it. I wouldn't be adverse to picking him at #10, so I get to swap Marcus for Jack in the process. The only thing that gives me pause is I'm not overly familiar with Jack. From what little I've seen he never really stood out to me. If they take Robin Lopez I won't be thrilled. He seems similar to Boone to me, which isn't bad, but we have Boone already.
I really don't like Jack. I hope Kiki doesn't fall in love with these undersized SG's like Jack and Ager.
