Warriors make 5 year, 90 million dollar offer to Brand

Discussion in 'Golden State Warriors' started by Run BJM, Jul 2, 2008.

  1. Run BJM

    Run BJM Heavy lies the crown. Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,749
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Zhone @ Jul 2 2008, 03:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Mullin: Evil genius secretly sabotaging the future Clippers, giving him one less team to worry about in future playoff runs?

    I have to think these contracts he's offering are really too crazy, though. I don't think he's making these moves just to force the other teams' hands, but thinks its the best additions he can make, but it does make more sense if they were just to force other teams hands/embarass Baron perhaps.</div>
    Thats why I think Nellie is having a lot of influence on this. Mullin seems more conservative and less risk-taking, more cool headed and business like. I would think Nellie would be more inclined to put it all on the line and try to make statements, embarrass guys, force teams to do things they don't want to do.

    I'm sure they're both plotting together, its not just one or the other making decisions. Agree with you that its concerning how they're reportedly throwing around huge contracts though.
     
  2. Run BJM

    Run BJM Heavy lies the crown. Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,749
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Wow now the LATimes report says the offer is $100 M:

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>In a move that could act as sweet revenge, the Golden State Warriors have offered free-agent Elton Brand a more lucrative, multiyear deal than the Clippers have proposed, according to NBA sources who requested anonymity because they are not allowed to speak about other free-agent dealings.

    The Warriors offered $100 million over five years, the sources said.

    On Tuesday, the Clippers reached a verbal agreement to sign Warriors free-agent Baron Davis and were nearing a new deal with Brand.

    Now, the Warriors have more salary cap space than the Clippers and have offered Brand a maximum contract, according to the sources.

    Brand could not be reached for comment this morning.

    No deal can be announced until July 9.</div>
     
  3. Clif25

    Clif25 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,483
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Brand would be a nice pickup. He seemed to have played pretty well at the end of last season despite being injured and not really having much time to prepare. He's a 20-10 guy who is usually among the leaders in blocks. I think an Ellis/Harrington/Brand attack would be very versatile and fun to watch. There would just definitely need to be a stronger PG or more of a passing SG.

    If the team doesn't get Brand, then I am assuming that we will be back in rebuilding mode.
     
  4. jason bourne

    jason bourne JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,416
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Law enforcement
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Run BJM @ Jul 2 2008, 03:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Here's something interesting I just read about. To make the Baron deal go through the Clips have to renounce Mags and Brand, sign Brand to a lower annual salary, and then they'll have enough cap to officially sign Baron. By offering this huge deal to Brand, the Clips will be forced to match/beat this offer (or else let him go) thus not allowing them enough cap room to sign Baron to the deal they agreed on. The Clips would have to S&T with us. So this move effectively is another classic Nellie poker move. The Clips thought they had us beat but now Nellie is making sure we either land Brand or at least get something for Baron instead of letting him walk for free.

    And as a bonus the Clippers commit like 160 mils to two 29 year olds with questionable injury problems for the next 5/6 years respectively.</div>

    They want Maggette, too, who will turn 30 this year. Who can we take from the Clips -- Thornton? We'll probably have to take huge filler back though. I love to get Gordon, but he's probably untouchable.
     
  5. philsmith75

    philsmith75 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,580
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Brilliant move by the Warriors. Brand tore his achilles but he's a solid guy who does not rely solely on his quickness. This really jerks the Clippers because they've got to redo Brand and Baron now.
     
  6. HiRez

    HiRez Overlord

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I still suspect Brand pre-approved the Baron acquistion, agreeing to terms with the Clips beforehand, and won't bolt for more $. Hopefully I'm wrong because I would love to see Brand a Warrior, but I doubt it. I hope Mullin knows what he is doing.
     
  7. Zhone

    Zhone JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,351
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    At most this would prove is that Brand was the selling point. If Brand takes less money to stay which he likely will, more power to him, it shows that he wants to win, I can respect that.

    *Edit: Editing out bad info! BALEETED!
     
  8. Doctor Kajita

    Doctor Kajita Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,318
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Finance
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Zhone @ Jul 2 2008, 03:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>If Brand takes less money to stay which he likely will, more power to him, it shows that he wants to win, I can respect that.</div>

    Hopefully it will prove collusion too [​IMG]
     
  9. Ryan

    Ryan BBW Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kensaku @ Jul 2 2008, 06:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Zhone @ Jul 2 2008, 03:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>If Brand takes less money to stay which he likely will, more power to him, it shows that he wants to win, I can respect that.</div>

    Hopefully it will prove collusion too [​IMG]
    </div>


    I wonder if there's any possibility the Clips will have to hand over a draft pick like the niners had to give the Bears.
     
  10. Doctor Kajita

    Doctor Kajita Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,318
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Finance
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    SOURCE

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>The Elton Brand Update -- Not expecting anything to happen today

    From Janny Hu.


    OK, here's the latest on the Warriors chase of Elton Brand: Golden State has offered him a five-year deal worth $90 million, which is right around the maximum allowed, and more importantly, is about $15 MILLION MORE THAN THE CLIPPERS CAN OFFER.


    Why? Because in order to sign Baron Davis to his five-year, $65 million deal, the Clippers will have to renounce their rights to both Brand and Corey Maggette. Which means the Clips will become subject to the same salary cap constraints as any other team. Which means they cannot add a sixth year onto Brand's deal. Which means that five years at about $75 million is roughly their limit.


    Basically, the Clips had about $27 million worth of cap space to work with once Magette and Brand opted out of their contracts Monday. According to multiple league sources, that was to be divided between Baron and Brand, with Brand coming away with a little more of the split than Baron.


    Now? Baron is headed to L.A. ... And Brand has both the Clippers and Warriors playing a waiting game. So stay tuned.</div>
     
  11. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I would love Brand. He has more value than any point guard IMO. Plus, it would get back at the Clippers for their move and Baron Davis for his "betrayal". Actually, Baron Davis is probably not the bad guy if he already had known something like the Warriors didn't have him in their future plans. But, it looks bad because he was saying he was going to stay in, but he did the opposite.

    Jrich will probably be the only warrior that actually gets some love, because Baron and the other warriors were pretty unpopular for how they exited or for how much they demanded and couldn't deliver.

    Plus, isn't what Baron did illegal? Seems kind of strange he'd opt out under such circumstances and the Clippers already got something ready for him.
     
  12. Run BJM

    Run BJM Heavy lies the crown. Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,749
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Custodianrules2 @ Jul 2 2008, 09:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I would love Brand. He has more value than any point guard IMO. Plus, it would get back at the Clippers for their move and Baron Davis for his "betrayal". Actually, Baron Davis is probably not the bad guy if he already had known something like the Warriors didn't have him in their future plans. But, it looks bad because he was saying he was going to stay in, but he did the opposite.

    Jrich will probably be the only warrior that actually gets some love, because Baron and the other warriors were pretty unpopular for how they exited or for how much they demanded and couldn't deliver.

    Plus, isn't what Baron did illegal? Seems kind of strange he'd opt out under such circumstances and the Clippers already got something ready for him.</div>
    Yeah I wouldn't say Baron is the bad guy. Mullin didn't give him a contract last off-season because he wanted Baron to prove he could stay healthy and have a good attitude all season. He did that in 07-08 and then from most reports Mullin gave him basically no legit offers and contract talks "went nowhere". The Clips were offering 5 years and we were not (and rightfully so), thats all it comes down to. Baron took the guaranteed money and good luck to the Clips for investing 5 years in him. I'm glad we didn't commit to him for 5 years and I'm even more glad that it may net us Elton Brand.

    I would guess that Baron did know that Brand and Mags would opt out and that the Clips would offer him that big contract. It was probably an under the table discussion or some loop hole in which Baron's agent, Todd Ramasar (or some representative of his) did talk to someone in the Clippers organization (or their representatives) to get this in place. It was probably illegal but not anything out of the ordinary and I'm sure they either a) left no proof that this happened or b) found some loophole. As this continues to go on I'm thinking more and more that Brand and maybe even Baron weren't plotting to both be in LAC though. I think Brand had already decided to opt out, Baron's agent got word that the Clips could give him the deal he wanted so they went for it and the Clips assumed they'd get Brand back with ease because he already said he'd sign for a little less to get a good player on the team. I don't think the Clippers anticipated us offering 15 mils more though.

    BTW it seems that the numbers Brand was offered by the W's were in fact 5 years/90mil. Janny hu just updated as Kensaku posted and now the LATimes guy updated this as well:

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Suddenly and swiftly, the question out of Clipperland on Wednesday became: What will Elton Brand do?

    In awhirlwind that amounted to "who has the salary cap space now?", the Golden State Warriors reached deep down the coastline and even deeper into their pocketbooks, offering free-agent forward Brand a five-year, $90-million contract, according to multiple NBA sources who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly about player movements.

    The offer came after the Clippers expected to reach an agreement with Brand, 29, as soon as Wednesday for a five-year, $70-million contract, the most the team could offer under salary cap considerations and still sign free-agent guard Baron Davis, whom the team had come to a verbal agreement with Tuesday, according to the sources.

    No deal can be announced until July 9 and next year's salary cap, expected to be around $58 million, is set in stone. Also, teams are not permitted to speak on the specific status of free agents until that date.

    The Philadelphia 76ers, one of the remaining teams with significant space under the expected cap, are also expected to enter the bidding for Brand's services, creating a potential bidding war for the All-Star forward.

    "This is the NBA," Clippers President Andy Roeser said Wednesday. "It's very fluid and anything can happen, but we're confident it's all going to work out for us at the end of the moratorium."

    Brand departed for Washington on Wednesday to meet with his agent David Falk, according to the sources. Both he and Falk could not be reached for comment.

    As Brand flew, the Clippers spent much of the afternoon on the phone with Falk, according to the sources.

    Only a day earlier, the club pulled off arguably its biggest free-agent coup in the franchise's history by landing Davis. Todd Ramasar, Davis' agent, said Tuesday that Davis verbally agreed with the Clippers, in part, because of the lure and likelihood of playing alongside Brand.

    Brand and forward Corey Maggette, who for years have been the faces of the franchise, opted out of the final season of their contracts Monday, choosing to test free agency.

    Entering his 10th NBA season, Brand has averaged 20.3 points and 10.2 rebounds a year. He missed all but eight games last season while recovering from a ruptured Achilles' tendon and was due $16.4 million next season had he stayed under the final year of his contract.

    He is well received and respected within the organization, not only in the way he trains and dedicates himself to the game, but also in how he handles himself off the court.

    But the latest developments in their attempts to reach a deal with him on a contract have left some confused, according to the sources.

    When reached by phone Monday shortly after choosing to become a free agent, he referred to the Clippers as "we" and said that he would like the Clippers to land a player "solid at the point guard spot," before he would agree to re-sign with the Clippers.

    At that time Falk said that Brand's decision to opt out had partly been made to allow the Clippers breathing space under the salary cap to sign an impact free agent.

    That day, the possibility of the Clippers losing both Brand and Maggette reflected a dreary day for an organization that has seen more than its share of them.

    The next, highlighted by the agreement with Davis, who had appeared to fill the requisite of a solid point guard, reflected unbridled enthusiasm that had rarely been seen in the Clippers' past.

    Wednesday?

    Déjà vu day.

    If Brand departs the Clippers, they would again have enough salary cap space to re-sign Maggette, who was their leading scorer last season was due to make $7 million next season. Maggette, however, is also an attractive free agent and is being wooed by the Boston Celtics, Cleveland Cavaliers and San Antonio Spurs.

    The Clippers could also begin targeting Atlanta Hawks' restricted free-agent forward Josh Smith, who visited the 76ers on Wednesday.

    Ramasar could not be reached Wednesday to be asked how Brand's situation potentially affects Davis' verbal agreement with the Clippers.</div>
    http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-clips3...0,2057944.story
     
  13. Zhone

    Zhone JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,351
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Custodianrules2 @ Jul 2 2008, 09:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Plus, isn't what Baron did illegal? Seems kind of strange he'd opt out under such circumstances and the Clippers already got something ready for him.</div>

    It's possible, but hard to prove. The only real signs were some comments he made about going home (which weren't directly related to his basketball career, but moreso that he was buying a home down there to do more film stuff) and his known desire to go home. The tampering rule exists to prevent any players contacting about availablity while that player is still under contract. However if both were free agents, they could talk to each other as much as they wanted. Basically what opened the door was Maggette opting out, though. (In the end we can all blame Maggette?) If Baron learned that Maggette opted out, without any other contact with the team or other players, that would be perfectly fine (since it only raised the possibility of going to the Clips). Anything further, like the Clips contacting him directly or any negotiations would be tampering.

    Most likely scenario involves no direct tampering, but we'll never know:
    1. Agent informs him of Clippers/Maggette opt out and possibility of about $10 in cap room, this was easily forseeable
    2. Baron opts out, assuming he will land either with Clippers or back with W's if that doesn't work out, since the W's have plenty of cap space and he feels he has the upper hand in negotiations either way
    3. Clippers ended up working out, and Baron talks to Brand or vice versa (free to do so now both as FA, and Baron of course free to talk with any team as FA)
    4. Clippers sign Baron, and are free still to talk with Brand about his decision
     
  14. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Okay, I got it. Thanks for the clarification, Zhone. Man, it's a definitely shocking in a way, but not totally surprising. I'm actually excited we get to address the issue of our team once and for all. We need to improve many things, most notably is the way we play defense and how we play the halfcourt game. If we don't control the tempo we're severely disadvantaged so we need to adjust to different tempos. We just can't go through another year of getting stuck going smaller and smaller and playing no defense and not being able to score inside the paint when we need to. I think the year we made the playoffs, we played with a little more size and aggressiveness on the defensive end. I would like to see the return of that. When I found out Biedrins went from 245 to 230 or 220 lbs, I felt his progress was going backwards. For one, he's an aggressive, physical player, so I'd say get him physical enough to compete rather than lighter, quicker, faster where he just can't bang. It would definitely help his defensive game and we absolute need defense at the center position or we might as well go back to Murphy or Zarko at C. At Biedrins' weight he should be playing a power forward. We'll see what Nelson does, though.
     
  15. Legacy

    Legacy Beast

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Messages:
    8,214
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Do you guys think we could get Brand? I could see him making his decision by tomorrow. I can't wait because our offer is so much more than the Clippers' offer. How sweet would it be if he signed with us after Baron left. Then Baron would be in an even worse spot than he originally was in with us.

    Ellis
    Belinelli
    Jackson
    Brand
    Biedrins

    That lineup looks strong, especially with Harrington, Wright, and Randolph coming of off the bench. I don't know if Nellie would play Brand or Andris as the starting center. Brand is tougher, while Biedrins isn't strong enough to be as effective as the center for now. I would love for him to hit the gym this offseason and gain a few pounds of muscle. We could use him as a low post presence instead of just a pick and roll/cutting scorer.
     
  16. Run BJM

    Run BJM Heavy lies the crown. Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,749
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Legacy @ Jul 3 2008, 01:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Do you guys think we could get Brand? I could see him making his decision by tomorrow. I can't wait because our offer is so much more than the Clippers' offer. How sweet would it be if he signed with us after Baron left. Then Baron would be in an even worse spot than he originally was in with us.

    Ellis
    Belinelli
    Jackson
    Brand
    Biedrins

    That lineup looks strong, especially with Harrington, Wright, and Randolph coming of off the bench. I don't know if Nellie would play Brand or Andris as the starting center. Brand is tougher, while Biedrins isn't strong enough to be as effective as the center for now. I would love for him to hit the gym this offseason and gain a few pounds of muscle. We could use him as a low post presence instead of just a pick and roll/cutting scorer.</div>
    Maybe I'm overthinking this but I'm starting to think more and more that Brand is a possibility. This is intruiging (from the LATimes article I posted just above):

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Brand departed for Washington on Wednesday to meet with his agent David Falk, according to the sources. Both he and Falk could not be reached for comment.

    As Brand flew, the Clippers spent much of the afternoon on the phone with Falk, according to the sources.</div>

    I just think that if the Clips, Brand, and Baron had this whole thing worked out where Brand gets X amount of their cap and Baron gets Y amount of their cap it'd be done ASAP. Why would Brand fly across the country to meet with his agent if the decision was made? They've gotta at least be considering other offers. My own world-renowned psycho analysis says Brand is headed to Washington D.C. to go over his options- I presume they are going to go over potential ways to stay in L.A. whilst getting the GSW level contract. But if Hu is right and there's nothing the Clips can really do then the Warriors basically have the situation by the balls (which, by the way is fuggin brilliant on the part of Nellie/Mully/W's front office people). It's probably to GS' advantage that Brand is removed from LA and in the presence of his greedy agent while making the decision. I think Brand wants to stay in LA and get the money, I don't think that's realistic though, he may be forced to choose one or the other. And this isn't your typical superstar taking a slight paycut to be on a contender in my estimation. The Clips would be good with Baron/Brand but still probably a second tier team in the west and its not like hes going to a terrible team if hes coming here. We were a 48 win team last year, replace Baron with Brand and we still have two other 20 ppg scorers, a good dirty work C, a young core that is oozing with talent, and a top 5 coach. Oh and did I mention the 15 MILLION extra dollars to move north 500 miles?

    This quote doesn't exactly give me confidence that Sterling will break the bank (by way of the luxury tax threshhold) to get Baron and Brand together: '"This is the NBA," Clippers President Andy Roeser said Wednesday. "It's very fluid and anything can happen, but we're confident it's all going to work out for us at the end of the moratorium."'

    Play with Baron, Kaman, Thornton, Mobley, Eric Gordon and play in LA vs. play with Nellie, Monta, Jack, Ellis, Biedrins, young core and be $15 million richer. If Hu is right and Sterling refuses to go into luxury tax hell the likes of which we haven't seen before then the choice seems to be Brand's and Brand's alone.
     
  17. AlleyOop

    AlleyOop JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    3,095
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Legacy @ Jul 3 2008, 01:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Do you guys think we could get Brand? I could see him making his decision by tomorrow. I can't wait because our offer is so much more than the Clippers' offer. How sweet would it be if he signed with us after Baron left. Then Baron would be in an even worse spot than he originally was in with us.

    Ellis
    Belinelli
    Jackson
    Brand
    Biedrins

    That lineup looks strong, especially with Harrington, Wright, and Randolph coming of off the bench. I don't know if Nellie would play Brand or Andris as the starting center. Brand is tougher, while Biedrins isn't strong enough to be as effective as the center for now. I would love for him to hit the gym this offseason and gain a few pounds of muscle. We could use him as a low post presence instead of just a pick and roll/cutting scorer.</div>

    I think it would be awesome, and I agree that line-up is intriguing. Belinelli can handle well and that makes up for Mona's so-so PG skills. But I still don't see Monta being a true PG. I think we need to find a tough PG to allow Monta to play the 2. If we got Brand, resigned Az, and then traded Harrington for Heinrich, then this would be interesting:

    Heinrich / CJWatson
    Monta / Belinelli
    Jax / Azibuike / Randolph
    Brand / Wright / Hendrix
    Beans / Perovic

    Alas, I HIGHLY doubt Brand leaves the Clips. He's one of the few players in the league I could actually see taking less money for the sake of the team. He and Baron are friends, plus they have the same agent. There must have been open communication about this situation. I think it's wishful thinking for GS fans to think Brand will bite at Mullin's sneaky move. But hey, that's what makes this process fun -- who knows?!
     
  18. Zhone

    Zhone JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,351
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Actually about the agent thing, I know I said it earlier but I was wrong. Brand is represented by David Falk (FAME) and Davis by Todd Ramasar (Life Sports Management). I read it somewhere that they were supposedly under the same agency but that's not even the case; I never checked on it until reading more about Brand and realized it wasn't the same guy. Falk is a much bigger name. Thus I blame bad reporting (though I was probably reading a fan's post and not a real reporter's thoughts) and my oversights. D'oh!

    Kawakami blames David Falk alone. Davis and Brand are also friends, though. But the agent thing is definitely wrong and my mistake.
     
  19. Legacy

    Legacy Beast

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Messages:
    8,214
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    If we actually get Brand, Baron is screwed. [​IMG]
     
  20. AlleyOop

    AlleyOop JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    3,095
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Zhone @ Jul 3 2008, 01:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Actually about the agent thing, I know I said it earlier but I was wrong. Brand is represented by David Falk (FAME) and Davis by Todd Ramasar (Life Sports Management). I read it somewhere that they were supposedly under the same agency but that's not even the case; I never checked on it until reading more about Brand and realized it wasn't the same guy. Falk is a much bigger name. Thus I blame bad reporting (though I was probably reading a fan's post and not a real reporter's thoughts) and my oversights. D'oh!

    Kawakami blames David Falk alone. Davis and Brand are also friends, though. But the agent thing is definitely wrong and my mistake.</div>

    Huh -- yeah, I thought I read that in the ESPN write-up, too. But I just checked it, and you're right. That change things, for sure. Falk knows that if Brand gets paid more money, than so does he... maybe he'll convince Brand to take the nearly $20 extra mils. This update just hit ESPN:

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Brand leaning toward Clippers but Warriors' offer hefty

    By Marc Stein
    ESPN.com
    (Archive)

    Updated: July 3, 2008, 2:35 AM ET


    The Los Angeles Clippers will have to wait at least one more day -- and maybe longer -- to know for sure that they'll be able to unveil their dream pairing of Baron Davis and Elton Brand next season.

    That's because the Golden State Warriors have responded to losing Davis to the Clippers by giving Brand a lucrative alternative to consider, urging him to relocate to Northern California by taking their five-year contract offer worth an estimated $90 million.

    Strong indications persist that Brand will stay in L.A., largely because he explained his decision to opt out of the final year of his previous contract Monday by saying he was trying to give the Clippers some financial flexibility to strengthen the team around him. But Brand is apparently still considering Golden State's rich proposal.

    It was initially expected that Brand might verbally commit to re-signing with the Clippers on Wednesday, one day after Davis told the Clippers he was accepting their five-year offer worth an estimated $65 million to go back home to Los Angeles. Brand instead flew to Washington to consult face-to-face with agent David Falk while Golden State was poised to give him a deal possibly $20 million richer than what the Clippers can offer.

    Sources close to the situation told ESPN.com on Wednesday night that the most likely scenario remains Brand re-signing with L.A. and ultimately teaming with Davis no matter what the Warriors present. One source said that Brand, during negotiations on a contract extension in June, specifically told Clippers management that Davis was the player he hoped they'd pursue if he became available in free agency.

    Yet sources also said late Wednesday that the magnitude of Golden State's offer forced Brand to give it a serious look and has Clippers officials privately concerned that their fantasy scenario could collapse, with no decision from Brand guaranteed before the July 4 holiday.

    The saga began Monday when Brand unexpectedly walked away from next season's $16.4 million salary to become an unrestricted free agent. Brand immediately announced that his "intention is to stay" with the Clippers. Falk told ESPN.com that they wanted to "afford the Clippers roster flexibility over the next nine days" to solidify the team around Brand and eventually sign a contract -- presumably with a slight pay cut -- that would enable Brand to "finish his career with the Clippers."

    Brand's decision to opt out, coupled with a similar move by high-scoring swingman Corey Maggette, suddenly created a scenario where L.A. could have more than $25 million for next season to split on Brand and Davis, provided that Brand was willing to re-sign at a discount. Davis quickly gave a verbal commitment to the Clippers when his own decision to opt out Monday -- forfeiting next season's $17.8 million with the Warriors -- failed to bring Golden State back to the negotiating table.

    ESPN.com reported early Wednesday morning that the Warriors responded to Davis' decision to opt out by making a lucrative offer to Brand -- after a similarly lucrative offer to Washington Wizards guard Gilbert Arenas -- as opposed to resuming talks with Davis. The sides were far apart on negotiations for a contract extension leading into free agency.

    "I'm sure a lot of people were surprised yesterday when Baron opted out, but it was done with the idea that the Warriors would come back with something else," Davis' agent Todd Ramasar told ESPN.com on Tuesday. "We still expected a discussion for Baron to remain a Warrior.

    "He had a great run with the Warriors. That had become home for him. ... [But] this is about having the best team in place, especially at this point in his career. Baron just wants to win. He has a chance to do something special with the Clippers and come back home."

    Free agents and teams were allowed to reach verbal agreements on new contracts as of 12:01 a.m. Tuesday morning, but no signings or trades can be finalized before July 9. That's when the NBA will lift its annual moratorium on roster moves which is needed to compute the salary cap for the following season.

    Davis' promise to sign with the Clippers makes him by far the most marquee free-agent signing in the club's quarter-century in Los Angeles under the stewardship of owner Donald Sterling. The closest thing to a big-name free agent signed away from another team in the Sterling Era is Cuttino Mobley, lured from Orlando to Hollywood by a five-year deal worth $42 million in 2005.

    There are a number of reasons Brand likely won't leave the Clippers. He has a longstanding friendship with Davis, Golden State's young roster now lacks a proven point guard and Falk said Monday that Brand has been inspired to make the talent around him a top priority given what happened in Boston this season with Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce and Ray Allen.

    It was not immediately known whether the Clippers will be able to manufacture another move or two that enables them to increase their offer to Brand while keeping Davis at his established figures.

    "He's sort of the face of that team and he wants to try to get it back to where they were a couple years ago when they almost got to the conference finals," Falk said Monday, adding that Brand became a free agent with the intent to "maximize his opportunity to be on a serious contender."</div>

    Hmm...
     

Share This Page