Getting a better starting lineup

Discussion in 'Brooklyn Nets' started by NOMAM, Jul 15, 2008.

  1. NOMAM

    NOMAM Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Right now the Nets bench seems fine. But the starting lineup is a problem for me. I only feel comfortable with Harris and Carter starting. Krstic could start but his contract status is up in the air. I don't like Simmons starting and would like to trade him as well as Hassell and Swift. Yi I would rather bring off the bench. I desperately want atleast two more quality staters at the SF and PF/C center positions. The trick is getting someone who has 2 years or less on their contract.


    Harris/?
    Carter/Hayes/CDR
    ?/Najera
    ?/Yi/Anderson
    ?/Lopez/

    Players and assets to use in a trade:

    3 million dollar trade exception
    2 future first round picks

    Young guys:

    Marcus Williams
    Sean Williams
    Josh Boone

    Expiring contracts:

    Stromile Swift
    Keith Van Horn

    Contract filler:

    Trenton Hassell
    Bobby Simmons


    Sing and trade possibilities:

    Nenad Krstic
    Bostjan Nachbar


    Here are some (really) good players from around the league that have contracts two years or shorter. Some of them the Nets have a slim to none chance of getting but I still believe in miracles. I just want to obtain two more good starters with what the Nets have to trade:

    Swingmen:

    Manu Ginobli
    Josh Howard
    Ron Artest
    Travis outlaw
    Raja Bell
    Richard Hamilton
    Hedo Turkoglu
    Shaw Marion
    Mike Miller
    Marvin Williams
    Joe Johnson
    Stephen Jackson

    Big guys:

    Marcus Camby
    Drew Gooden
    Zrdrunas Ilgauskas
    Anderson Varejao
    Shaquille O'Neil
    Brad Miller
    Carlos Boozer
    Rasheed Wallace
    Antonio McDyess
    Udonis Haslem
    Chis Wilcox
    Al Harrington
    Lamar Odom
     
  2. fefe

    fefe Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Yi will start. and he will do very well. 13/7 at least. Anedrson and Najera will back him up I think.

    We have 3 new SFs in Hayes Simmons and Najera (SF-PF).
    I'm affraid one of these 3 will start at 3, but there is no way i could agree more, that we need a starting SF. And I'd love Nocioni for that.

    as for starting C, we clearly need someone. Brook is nice, but he is our only legit C, and he will do fine with 20 mpg, but not more.
    if Krstic signs for cheap, I'm fine with him.
    Camby would be great though.

    I really hope we can get Dooling or Pargo too as FA. They can backup both guard positions.

    for a starting C and a SF, we can give up Marcus, Boone, Sean, Stro, Hassell, KVH, and maybe Ager, with resigned Krstic and maybe even Boki.
    If Boone doesn't look valuable in trades, he can stay as a 3rd string C, but I think we will have to use him, and get some big stiff as a 3rd C. Lore Woods was just waived i think [​IMG]


    that would be nice...
     
  3. Lavalamp

    Lavalamp Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Hayes isn't a SF, he is a PF and is good for gritty defense and grabbing boards, and taking open layups.

    Najera can probably be quick enough defensively against some of the bigger and less agile SFs I guess like Lamar Odom, Kirilenko, Harpring, Tayshawn, Powe, Battier, S. Jax, Peja, Turkoglue, Bowen. But guys like J-Rich, Gerald Wallace, RJ, Marion, Tmac, Lebron, Paul Pierce, Josh Howard, Butler, Iguodala are too quick for him.
     
  4. Netted

    Netted Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Lavalamp @ Jul 15 2008, 02:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Hayes isn't a SF, he is a PF and is good for gritty defense and grabbing boards, and taking open layups.

    Najera can probably be quick enough defensively against some of the bigger and less agile SFs I guess like Lamar Odom, Kirilenko, Harpring, Tayshawn, Powe, Battier, S. Jax, Peja, Turkoglue, Bowen. But guys like J-Rich, Gerald Wallace, RJ, Marion, Tmac, Lebron, Paul Pierce, Josh Howard, Butler, Iguodala are too quick for him.</div>
    Hayes is a SF. Did you mean Najera isn't a SF?
     
  5. danxcr

    danxcr Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,710
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    YA... hayes is more of the SF/SG type while najera is the SF/PF type [​IMG]
     
  6. fefe

    fefe Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    he is probably thinking about chuck hayes on the rockets...
    jarvis is no pf at all. i can't see him play too much sg either.
    i hope he is not our starting sf though...
     
  7. Lavalamp

    Lavalamp Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    lol I was totally thinking Chuck Hayes, not Jarvis Hayes. The signing totally makes sense now. Sorry about the confusion.

    Well in that case he is a nice fit.
     
  8. NOMAM

    NOMAM Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    38
    What about a trade of Bobby Simmons and Yi for Richard Jefferson?
     
  9. Uneek

    Uneek Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 16 2008, 07:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>What about a trade of Bobby Simmons and Yi for Richard Jefferson?</div>

    Very nice... can't wait for that to happen.... what goes around comes back around... [​IMG]
     
  10. Answer_AI03

    Answer_AI03 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,428
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Najera can't gaurd small forwards? hhmm never knew that...

    anyway, why would the nets want to get better? They need to go into full out rebuilding mode and should be trading Carter for expiring contracts and picks. If the Nets can't land a bigtime free agent in 2010 they are screwed. The sixers got lucky by prying away Elton Brand from the Clippers, and that doesn't happen often. The good teams, rebuild with good young talent and cap space, and look for free agents at the same time. Not try to semi compete for the last playoff spot and hope to land a free agent in a couple years. Because if they don't they are stuck with the same crappy team, and middle round draft picks. Acquiring a young big man that will be a solid contributer in a couple years to put with Harris and Lebron/Amare/Bosh etc., would be the way to go.
     
  11. Cmoney707

    Cmoney707 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Answer_AI03 @ Jul 15 2008, 07:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Najera can't gaurd small forwards? hhmm never knew that...

    anyway, why would the nets want to get better? They need to go into full out rebuilding mode and should be trading Carter for expiring contracts and picks. If the Nets can't land a bigtime free agent in 2010 they are screwed. The sixers got lucky by prying away Elton Brand from the Clippers, and that doesn't happen often. The good teams, rebuild with good young talent and cap space, and look for free agents at the same time. Not try to semi compete for the last playoff spot and hope to land a free agent in a couple years. Because if they don't they are stuck with the same crappy team, and middle round draft picks. Acquiring a young big man that will be a solid contributer in a couple years to put with Harris and Lebron/Amare/Bosh etc., would be the way to go.</div>

    Because why would a big-time free agent want to come to a team that looks like complete garbage? A big time free agent wants to come to a team that is near the top of the hill so they can come in and push them over. Like Brand may have done with the Sixers. Like Shaq did with the Heat.

    The Nets have plenty of young talent, especially big men. They don't need to get any younger as they are what the 4th youngest team ever? As the Nets stand right now, they will have enough money to go after a big time free agent WITH VINCE CARTER still on the team. Trading Vince Carter will make this team look very undesireable for any free agent to come here.
     
  12. danxcr

    danxcr Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,710
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    why trade vince? give vince a shot at him "owning the team" this is vince's team... and look at him show up at summer league games to show support... hes excited... and we all kno what VC can do when motivated [​IMG]
     
  13. BrooklynBound

    BrooklynBound Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (danxcr @ Jul 15 2008, 08:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>why trade vince? give vince a shot at him "owning the team" this is vince's team... and look at him show up at summer league games to show support... hes excited... and we all kno what VC can do when motivated [​IMG]</div>
    I don't think Vince wants to own the team. I think he'd rather be the #2 guy.
     
  14. BrooklynBound

    BrooklynBound Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Cmoney707 @ Jul 15 2008, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Answer_AI03 @ Jul 15 2008, 07:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Najera can't gaurd small forwards? hhmm never knew that...

    anyway, why would the nets want to get better? They need to go into full out rebuilding mode and should be trading Carter for expiring contracts and picks. If the Nets can't land a bigtime free agent in 2010 they are screwed. The sixers got lucky by prying away Elton Brand from the Clippers, and that doesn't happen often. The good teams, rebuild with good young talent and cap space, and look for free agents at the same time. Not try to semi compete for the last playoff spot and hope to land a free agent in a couple years. Because if they don't they are stuck with the same crappy team, and middle round draft picks. Acquiring a young big man that will be a solid contributer in a couple years to put with Harris and Lebron/Amare/Bosh etc., would be the way to go.</div>

    Because why would a big-time free agent want to come to a team that looks like complete garbage? A big time free agent wants to come to a team that is near the top of the hill so they can come in and push them over. Like Brand may have done with the Sixers. Like Shaq did with the Heat.

    The Nets have plenty of young talent, especially big men. They don't need to get any younger as they are what the 4th youngest team ever? As the Nets stand right now, they will have enough money to go after a big time free agent WITH VINCE CARTER still on the team. Trading Vince Carter will make this team look very undesireable for any free agent to come here.
    </div>
    The Sixers were near the top of the hill?
     
  15. nets1

    nets1 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    Messages:
    901
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrooklynBound @ Jul 15 2008, 07:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (danxcr @ Jul 15 2008, 08:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>why trade vince? give vince a shot at him "owning the team" this is vince's team... and look at him show up at summer league games to show support... hes excited... and we all kno what VC can do when motivated [​IMG]</div>
    I don't think Vince wants to own the team. I think he'd rather be the #2 guy.
    </div>

    Back when Kidd was here he was ok with being the #2 guy, but now that kidd and RJ are gone he is expected and expects to be the #1 guy. Its VC's real chance to prove he's a leader. What he did at summer camp was a step in the right direction. This may be vince's toughest year as a pro, and i wonder if he's up to the challange. Who knows maybe Vince will be the new triple double leader on this team...

    Oh yeah go nets!!!
     
  16. ghoti

    ghoti A PhD in Horribleness

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,516
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrooklynBound @ Jul 15 2008, 08:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (danxcr @ Jul 15 2008, 08:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>why trade vince? give vince a shot at him "owning the team" this is vince's team... and look at him show up at summer league games to show support... hes excited... and we all kno what VC can do when motivated [​IMG]</div>
    I don't think Vince wants to own the team. I think he'd rather be the #2 guy.
    </div>

    I think that only applies when there is another dominant personality around for him to defer to.

    The most interesting thing about this season is that all the alpha dogs are gone and the atmosphere is perfect for a less assertive guy like Vince to really set the tone.

    I'm very curious to see how that plays out, but the way he's handled things so far has been really great.
     
  17. Netted

    Netted Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrooklynBound @ Jul 15 2008, 08:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Cmoney707 @ Jul 15 2008, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Answer_AI03 @ Jul 15 2008, 07:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Najera can't gaurd small forwards? hhmm never knew that...

    anyway, why would the nets want to get better? They need to go into full out rebuilding mode and should be trading Carter for expiring contracts and picks. If the Nets can't land a bigtime free agent in 2010 they are screwed. The sixers got lucky by prying away Elton Brand from the Clippers, and that doesn't happen often. The good teams, rebuild with good young talent and cap space, and look for free agents at the same time. Not try to semi compete for the last playoff spot and hope to land a free agent in a couple years. Because if they don't they are stuck with the same crappy team, and middle round draft picks. Acquiring a young big man that will be a solid contributer in a couple years to put with Harris and Lebron/Amare/Bosh etc., would be the way to go.</div>

    Because why would a big-time free agent want to come to a team that looks like complete garbage? A big time free agent wants to come to a team that is near the top of the hill so they can come in and push them over. Like Brand may have done with the Sixers. Like Shaq did with the Heat.

    The Nets have plenty of young talent, especially big men. They don't need to get any younger as they are what the 4th youngest team ever? As the Nets stand right now, they will have enough money to go after a big time free agent WITH VINCE CARTER still on the team. Trading Vince Carter will make this team look very undesireable for any free agent to come here.
    </div>
    The Sixers were near the top of the hill?
    </div>
    I think the point was that they were a young team that was competing and made the playoffs. That's what attracted Brand. They weren't a team with a bunch of children full of potential.
     
  18. BrooklynBound

    BrooklynBound Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Jul 15 2008, 08:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrooklynBound @ Jul 15 2008, 08:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Cmoney707 @ Jul 15 2008, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Answer_AI03 @ Jul 15 2008, 07:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Najera can't gaurd small forwards? hhmm never knew that...

    anyway, why would the nets want to get better? They need to go into full out rebuilding mode and should be trading Carter for expiring contracts and picks. If the Nets can't land a bigtime free agent in 2010 they are screwed. The sixers got lucky by prying away Elton Brand from the Clippers, and that doesn't happen often. The good teams, rebuild with good young talent and cap space, and look for free agents at the same time. Not try to semi compete for the last playoff spot and hope to land a free agent in a couple years. Because if they don't they are stuck with the same crappy team, and middle round draft picks. Acquiring a young big man that will be a solid contributer in a couple years to put with Harris and Lebron/Amare/Bosh etc., would be the way to go.</div>

    Because why would a big-time free agent want to come to a team that looks like complete garbage? A big time free agent wants to come to a team that is near the top of the hill so they can come in and push them over. Like Brand may have done with the Sixers. Like Shaq did with the Heat.

    The Nets have plenty of young talent, especially big men. They don't need to get any younger as they are what the 4th youngest team ever? As the Nets stand right now, they will have enough money to go after a big time free agent WITH VINCE CARTER still on the team. Trading Vince Carter will make this team look very undesireable for any free agent to come here.
    </div>
    The Sixers were near the top of the hill?
    </div>
    I think the point was that they were a young team that was competing and made the playoffs. That's what attracted Brand. They weren't a team with a bunch of children full of potential.
    </div>I think the bigger factors were the money and the organization being heaps better than the Clippers. The Sixers won 40 games, big deal.
     
  19. Netted

    Netted Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 15 2008, 08:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrooklynBound @ Jul 15 2008, 08:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (danxcr @ Jul 15 2008, 08:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>why trade vince? give vince a shot at him "owning the team" this is vince's team... and look at him show up at summer league games to show support... hes excited... and we all kno what VC can do when motivated [​IMG]</div>
    I don't think Vince wants to own the team. I think he'd rather be the #2 guy.
    </div>

    I think that only applies when there is another dominant personality around for him to defer to.

    The most interesting thing about this season is that all the alpha dogs are gone and the atmosphere is perfect for a less assertive guy like Vince to really set the tone.

    I'm very curious to see how that plays out, but the way he's handled things so far has been really great.
    </div>
    Totally agree. Should be interesting and a more team oriented approach rather than the whole "big 3" thing. Vince knows he'll be needed to score more AND create for others, which is something I think he takes a lot more pride with in the last couple years than ever before. He's older and more mature. We all change over time and right now this could be a situation that comes at just the right time and brings the best out of him.
     
  20. yinets1860

    yinets1860 i love this game !

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    791
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    China
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Uneek @ Jul 15 2008, 05:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 16 2008, 07:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>What about a trade of Bobby Simmons and Yi for Richard Jefferson?</div>

    Very nice... can't wait for that to happen.... what goes around comes back around... [​IMG]
    </div>

    hehe,i thinks so,may be Yi will become another Dirk。。。。
     

Share This Page