16 players plus KVH The Keepers (5) Devin Harris Vince Carter Yi Jianlian Bobby Simmons (Sean Williams) The Rooks (3) Brook Lopez Ryan Anderson C.D.R Free agent movement (3) Keyon Dooling Eduardo Najara Jarvis Hayes Trade Material (6) KVH Contract Stromile Swift -expiring (upcomming Last year) Trenton Hassel Josh Boone Marcus williams Mo Ager (Sean Williams)* (Bobby Simmons) TRT** *but I doubt they trade him. ehh, I don't think his value is that high, but his potential is through the roof, and his down side isn't completely through the floor either. sort of in trade value limbo, but this is due to some inconsistancy and percieved maturity issues which I think are overdone. **TRT = Trade Restriction because recently traded ***I'll try to update this as any dumbass mistakes I might have made are pointed out.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Could you move Bobby Simmons from the "Keepers" column to the "Trade Material" column</div> he is untradeable, unless we take back an even worse contract.( Are there any worse ones?
yo and this from Kerber <span style="color:#FF0000">http://blogs.nypost.com/sports/nets/archives/2008/07/and_wait_theres.html</span> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Anyway, the Nets roster depth chart now: Point guard: Devin Harris, Marcus Williams, Keyon Dooling Off guard: Vince Carter , Dooling, Chris Douglas-Roberts, Trenton Hassell, Maurice Ager Small forward: Bobby Simmons, Jarvis Hayes, Douglas-Roberts, Eduardo Najera, Hassell Power Forward: Yi Jianlian, Najera, Sean Williams , Ryan Anderson, Stromile Swift Center: Josh Boone , Brook Lopez</div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MarionBarberThe4th @ Jul 18 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Could you move Bobby Simmons from the "Keepers" column to the "Trade Material" column</div> he is untradeable, unless we take back an even worse contract.( Are there any worse ones? </div> Well, by himself he's untradeable but add in some young guys or picks and he's contract filler.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 18 2008, 09:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MarionBarberThe4th @ Jul 18 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Could you move Bobby Simmons from the "Keepers" column to the "Trade Material" column</div> he is untradeable, unless we take back an even worse contract.( Are there any worse ones? </div> Well, by himself he's untradeable but add in some young guys or picks and he's contract filler. </div> I'm not even sure if can be packeged, I think it's a 1 for 1 kind of rule ?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jerkstore @ Jul 18 2008, 09:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 18 2008, 09:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MarionBarberThe4th @ Jul 18 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Could you move Bobby Simmons from the "Keepers" column to the "Trade Material" column</div> he is untradeable, unless we take back an even worse contract.( Are there any worse ones? </div> Well, by himself he's untradeable but add in some young guys or picks and he's contract filler. </div> I'm not even sure if can be packeged, I think it's a 1 for 1 kind of rule ? </div> That's true. He can't be packaged with other players in the same deal but he can be packaged with picks I believe. I think that restriction applies until mid-August. But they could do two separate deals where they send Simmons by himself and then a young guy in a smaller second trade if the other team has a small trade exception or a small expiring contract to send to the Nets.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 18 2008, 09:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MarionBarberThe4th @ Jul 18 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Could you move Bobby Simmons from the "Keepers" column to the "Trade Material" column</div> he is untradeable, unless we take back an even worse contract.( Are there any worse ones? </div> Well, by himself he's untradeable but add in some young guys or picks and he's contract filler. </div> He's going to come off the books in 2010. If they trade him for a longer contract(s), they severely reduce their chances of being able to land one of the premier FAs in the league.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>That's true. He can't be packaged with other players in the same deal but he can be packaged with picks I believe. I think that restriction applies until mid-August. But they could do two separate deals where they send Simmons by himself and then a young guy in a smaller second trade if the other team has a small trade exception or a small expiring contract to send to the Nets.</div> yeah that sounds like it's on the money. TRT- Trade Restriction because recently traded
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Astral @ Jul 18 2008, 10:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 18 2008, 09:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MarionBarberThe4th @ Jul 18 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Could you move Bobby Simmons from the "Keepers" column to the "Trade Material" column</div> he is untradeable, unless we take back an even worse contract.( Are there any worse ones? </div> Well, by himself he's untradeable but add in some young guys or picks and he's contract filler. </div> He's going to come off the books in 2010. If they trade him for a longer contract(s), they severely reduce their chances of being able to land one of the premier FAs in the league. </div> I'm not suggesting they trade him for someone who has a contract longer than two years.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 18 2008, 10:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Astral @ Jul 18 2008, 10:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 18 2008, 09:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MarionBarberThe4th @ Jul 18 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Could you move Bobby Simmons from the "Keepers" column to the "Trade Material" column</div> he is untradeable, unless we take back an even worse contract.( Are there any worse ones? </div> Well, by himself he's untradeable but add in some young guys or picks and he's contract filler. </div> He's going to come off the books in 2010. If they trade him for a longer contract(s), they severely reduce their chances of being able to land one of the premier FAs in the league. </div> I'm not suggesting they trade him for someone who has a contract longer than two years. </div> Then there's no point in trading him plus our young players for anyone. Pretty much the only thing we would be interested in is a larger expiring contract, and Simmons is already at ~$10.5M. Our options are pretty limited. Who would we get? Marbury? Plus, the flipside of the coin is that we really don't need a larger expiring contract. If they continue doing what they're doing they will be able to field a competitive team for the next 2 years and have enough cap space to sign LeBron if he decides to come here.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 18 2008, 09:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Could you move Bobby Simmons from the "Keepers" column to the "Trade Material" column.</div> what is so bad about simmons? He's a backup who could start in a pinch, i doubt we'll pay him anymore than 10 mpg average
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Astral @ Jul 18 2008, 10:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Then there's no point in trading him plus our young players for anyone. Pretty much the only thing we would be interested in is a larger expiring contract, and Simmons is already at ~$10.5M. Our options are pretty limited. Who would we get? Marbury? Plus, the flipside of the coin is that we really don't need a larger expiring contract. If they continue doing what they're doing they will be able to field a competitive team for the next 2 years and have enough cap space to sign LeBron if he decides to come here.</div> The point in trading him would be to get better players in the starting lineup to try to be more competitive the next two years. The bench seems fine at this point but their starting lineup needs work.
I'm guessing we won't see Marcus, Swift, possibly Kristic, Boki, Hassel, and Ager next season. And of course, KVH. I wonder what else they have up their sleeves. this is the biggest retooling I've seen any team do in quite some time.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 18 2008, 10:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Astral @ Jul 18 2008, 10:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Then there's no point in trading him plus our young players for anyone. Pretty much the only thing we would be interested in is a larger expiring contract, and Simmons is already at ~$10.5M. Our options are pretty limited. Who would we get? Marbury? Plus, the flipside of the coin is that we really don't need a larger expiring contract. If they continue doing what they're doing they will be able to field a competitive team for the next 2 years and have enough cap space to sign LeBron if he decides to come here.</div> The point in trading him would be to get better players in the starting lineup to try to be more competitive the next two years. The bench seems fine at this point but their starting lineup needs work. </div> Let's review. You're proposing that we trade Simmons plus undisclosed young players for someone who is better than Simmons, which means we wont be getting any young players in return. The quality of the player we get will depend on which one of our young guys we include. To get someone significantly better at that price range, we would have to include one of our major assets, currently Sean, Brook or Yi. .... But since we'll need the salary room ( as you said, you don't want anyone who has a contract of longer than 2 years) to sign LBJ, it implies that we'll discard the player we acquire in order to get LBJ. So we end up going from a possible playoff team to a possible 2nd round team ( at most), lose one of our major assets and make it less attractive for LBJ to come here? That seems pretty dumb. Remember, the scenario here is that we want to have at least $15M available to sign either LeBron or Wade to an offer sheet, forcing their teams into a S&T. If you're thinking of a straight up S&T, then all of these machinations that Kiki and Thorn are doing are pointless.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Astral @ Jul 18 2008, 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Let's review. You're proposing that we trade Simmons plus undisclosed young players for someone who is better than Simmons, which means we wont be getting any young players in return. The quality of the player we get will depend on which one of our young guys we include. To get someone significantly better at that price range, we would have to include one of our major assets, currently Sean, Brook or Yi. .... But since we'll need the salary room ( as you said, you don't want anyone who has a contract of longer than 2 years) to sign LBJ, it implies that we'll discard the player we acquire in order to get LBJ. So we end up going from a possible playoff team to a possible 2nd round team ( at most), lose one of our major assets and make it less attractive for LBJ to come here? That seems pretty dumb. Remember, the scenario here is that we want to have at least $15M available to sign either LeBron or Wade to an offer sheet, forcing their teams into a S&T. If you're thinking of a straight up S&T, then all of these machinations that Kiki and Thorn are doing are pointless.</div> Harris/Dooling/Marcus Carter/Hayes/CDR/Ager Simmons/Najera/Hassell Yi/Sean/Anderson/Swift Boone/Lopez/(Krstic?) The Nets have a glut at the wing positions and the PF/C positions. It would be in their best interest to clear this up. Yi, Brook and Anderson in all likelihood will not be traded this off-season. Krstic's status is still up in the air. There is a very good possibility that at least one of Boone and Sean will be traded. Marcus will be shopped as well. Now, it's clear the Nets front office wants to be competitive the next two seasons or else they wouldn't be making these moves by bringing in guys like Dooling, Najera, and Hayes. It would be dumb if they got these guys who could make the Nets just good enough to miss the playoffs while giving them a worse pick in the lottery. If they want to be competitive by making the playoffs then they need to improve their starting lineup. They mostly likely need to make some trades anyways. How many young bigs can they develop at one time and still be competitive?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NOMAM @ Jul 18 2008, 11:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Astral @ Jul 18 2008, 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Let's review. You're proposing that we trade Simmons plus undisclosed young players for someone who is better than Simmons, which means we wont be getting any young players in return. The quality of the player we get will depend on which one of our young guys we include. To get someone significantly better at that price range, we would have to include one of our major assets, currently Sean, Brook or Yi. .... But since we'll need the salary room ( as you said, you don't want anyone who has a contract of longer than 2 years) to sign LBJ, it implies that we'll discard the player we acquire in order to get LBJ. So we end up going from a possible playoff team to a possible 2nd round team ( at most), lose one of our major assets and make it less attractive for LBJ to come here? That seems pretty dumb. Remember, the scenario here is that we want to have at least $15M available to sign either LeBron or Wade to an offer sheet, forcing their teams into a S&T. If you're thinking of a straight up S&T, then all of these machinations that Kiki and Thorn are doing are pointless.</div> Harris/Dooling/Marcus Carter/Hayes/CDR/Ager Simmons/Najera/Hassell Yi/Sean/Anderson/Swift Boone/Lopez/(Krstic?) The Nets have a glut at the wing positions and the PF/C positions. It would be in their best interest to clear this up. Yi, Brook and Anderson in all likelihood will not be traded this off-season. Krstic's status is still up in the air. There is a very good possibility that at least one of Boone and Sean will be traded. Marcus will be shopped as well. Now, it's clear the Nets front office wants to be competitive the next two seasons or else they wouldn't be making these moves by bringing in guys like Dooling, Najera, and Hayes. It would be dumb if they got these guys who could make the Nets just good enough to miss the playoffs while giving them a worse pick in the lottery. If they want to be competitive by making the playoffs then they need to improve their starting lineup. They mostly likely need to make some trades anyways. How many young bigs can they develop at one time and still be competitive? </div>We're carrying 16 players right now. Obviously we have a glut at every position right now. This has nothing to do with the fact that Simmons is basically untradeable, unless we magically package him, Sean, Yi and a 1st round pick for another superstar class player.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Astral @ Jul 18 2008, 11:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>We're carrying 16 players right now. Obviously we have a glut at every position right now. This has nothing to do with the fact that Simmons is basically untradeable, unless we magically package him, Sean, Yi and a 1st round pick for another superstar class player.</div> That's what I'm saying. Simmons can be used in a trade as contract filler to match salaries for a good starter if they package him with some other assets. They could try it with Hassell, Swift and Van Horns contract as well. And I think there have been reports that they could go after a shooter like Kareem Rush (if they clear some roster space). He could end up playing the back up 2 with Hayes shifting to SF and Najera to PF. They still have some of their MLE left over to spend.
