<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Aug 8 2008, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Bynum is a good center to have, but he's 2nd round talent. Picking at the end of the first, you could have taken Paul Pierce, and then picked up Bynum with your high-2nd.</div> I know, but I was not sure he would have lasted that long, and I really wanted him on my team. You need big guys that can ball on a winning team.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 01:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Bynum isn't a defensive anchor or franchise player. He averaged 13 and 10. Would you have drafted Bynum over Oden if you had the chance?</div> Are you kidding me? The A-train is a beast defensively. I cant believe you just said that. Defensively he is sound, but offensively is where he needs to improve and tell me if the Blazers had Bynum instead of Oden people wouldnt be calling him a "Franchise player" too.. come on now. And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team. Also to answer your other question i dont think most people knew how good Bynum could be and how quickly he would start to Blossom so we didnt hear as much fuzz with him unlike with Oden and people calling him the next " Tim Duncan" So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100. And how can you call Oden a " Franchise player" or a defensive anchor if he hasnt even played a game yet!! YOU JUST CANNOT DO THAT! </div> Reading comprehension. I said Oden has the ability to become a franchise player and defensive anchor. Bynum is NOT a defensive anchor. Stop relying on how many blocks per game a player has to judge his defensive abilities. I'll always question Bynum's work ethic and attitude, too. He's a guy who is playing for a contract...when he gets that contract, you better hope he keeps playing as hard as he can. Oden has had one knee injury, Bynum has had recurring. That's not good. If Oden hurts his knee again, it's a huge worry, but Bynum is now 20 years old and has had more than one issue with his knee. What do you mean he didn't have to score for that Lakers team? They had Kobe...and that's about it. "So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100." Contradictions much? Way to cover both bases. I'd take Oden, but I'd take Bynum. What????
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 01:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 01:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Bynum isn't a defensive anchor or franchise player. He averaged 13 and 10. Would you have drafted Bynum over Oden if you had the chance?</div> Are you kidding me? The A-train is a beast defensively. I cant believe you just said that. Defensively he is sound, but offensively is where he needs to improve and tell me if the Blazers had Bynum instead of Oden people wouldnt be calling him a "Franchise player" too.. come on now. And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team. Also to answer your other question i dont think most people knew how good Bynum could be and how quickly he would start to Blossom so we didnt hear as much fuzz with him unlike with Oden and people calling him the next " Tim Duncan" So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100. And how can you call Oden a " Franchise player" or a defensive anchor if he hasnt even played a game yet!! YOU JUST CANNOT DO THAT! </div> Reading comprehension. I said Oden has the ability to become a franchise player and defensive anchor. Bynum is NOT a defensive anchor. Stop relying on how many blocks per game a player has to judge his defensive abilities. I'll always question Bynum's work ethic and attitude, too. He's a guy who is playing for a contract...when he gets that contract, you better hope he keeps playing as hard as he can. Oden has had one knee injury, Bynum has had recurring. That's not good. If Oden hurts his knee again, it's a huge worry, but Bynum is now 20 years old and has had more than one issue with his knee. What do you mean he didn't have to score for that Lakers team? They had Kobe...and that's about it. "So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100." Contradictions much? Way to cover both bases. I'd take Oden, but I'd take Bynum. What???? </div> No contradictions my friend, I said if oden and the 2005 bynum were both in a draft i would have taken Oden, but today knowning where both players stand today, i would take Bynum. And i did not know Andrew had more than one knee surgery. Also that lakers team had Kobe, Radmanovic, Odom and fisher ahead of Bynum. He was in for his defensive presense alone, Not scoring.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 02:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 01:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 01:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Bynum isn't a defensive anchor or franchise player. He averaged 13 and 10. Would you have drafted Bynum over Oden if you had the chance?</div> Are you kidding me? The A-train is a beast defensively. I cant believe you just said that. Defensively he is sound, but offensively is where he needs to improve and tell me if the Blazers had Bynum instead of Oden people wouldnt be calling him a "Franchise player" too.. come on now. And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team. Also to answer your other question i dont think most people knew how good Bynum could be and how quickly he would start to Blossom so we didnt hear as much fuzz with him unlike with Oden and people calling him the next " Tim Duncan" So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100. And how can you call Oden a " Franchise player" or a defensive anchor if he hasnt even played a game yet!! YOU JUST CANNOT DO THAT! </div> Reading comprehension. I said Oden has the ability to become a franchise player and defensive anchor. Bynum is NOT a defensive anchor. Stop relying on how many blocks per game a player has to judge his defensive abilities. I'll always question Bynum's work ethic and attitude, too. He's a guy who is playing for a contract...when he gets that contract, you better hope he keeps playing as hard as he can. Oden has had one knee injury, Bynum has had recurring. That's not good. If Oden hurts his knee again, it's a huge worry, but Bynum is now 20 years old and has had more than one issue with his knee. What do you mean he didn't have to score for that Lakers team? They had Kobe...and that's about it. "So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100." Contradictions much? Way to cover both bases. I'd take Oden, but I'd take Bynum. What???? </div> No contradictions my friend, I said if oden and the 2005 bynum were both in a draft i would have taken Oden, but today knowning where both players stand today, i would take Bynum. And i did not know Andrew had more than one knee surgery. Also that lakers team had Kobe, Radmanovic, Odom and fisher ahead of Bynum. He was in for his defensive presense alone, Not scoring. </div> So a franchise center that has Radmans, Fisher, and Odom ahead of him? Do you want Radmans and Fisher to be in your top 4 scorers?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 01:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Aug 8 2008, 10:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 10:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 09:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 09:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 08:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'd obviously rather have Oden. That and I hate Bynum.</div> Ok i can understand that, but why would rather have Oden who has never even play an NBA game over Bynum? What does he have that Bynum doesnt besides the obvious ( Not played a game yet ) </div> The ability to be a franchise player, a defensive anchor, and dominant in the paint. </div> Bynum has proved that he can do all of that already at the NBA level, while Oden hasnt. I rest my case. </div> If you were Kevin Prichard, would you trade Oden for Bynum straight up? </div> Truthfully, I dont know. I NEED to see how Oden plays first to make that decision, but at this point Bynum is the proven/better player. </div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 01:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 02:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 01:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 01:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Bynum isn't a defensive anchor or franchise player. He averaged 13 and 10. Would you have drafted Bynum over Oden if you had the chance?</div> Are you kidding me? The A-train is a beast defensively. I cant believe you just said that. Defensively he is sound, but offensively is where he needs to improve and tell me if the Blazers had Bynum instead of Oden people wouldnt be calling him a "Franchise player" too.. come on now. And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team. Also to answer your other question i dont think most people knew how good Bynum could be and how quickly he would start to Blossom so we didnt hear as much fuzz with him unlike with Oden and people calling him the next " Tim Duncan" So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100. And how can you call Oden a " Franchise player" or a defensive anchor if he hasnt even played a game yet!! YOU JUST CANNOT DO THAT! </div> Reading comprehension. I said Oden has the ability to become a franchise player and defensive anchor. Bynum is NOT a defensive anchor. Stop relying on how many blocks per game a player has to judge his defensive abilities. I'll always question Bynum's work ethic and attitude, too. He's a guy who is playing for a contract...when he gets that contract, you better hope he keeps playing as hard as he can. Oden has had one knee injury, Bynum has had recurring. That's not good. If Oden hurts his knee again, it's a huge worry, but Bynum is now 20 years old and has had more than one issue with his knee. What do you mean he didn't have to score for that Lakers team? They had Kobe...and that's about it. "So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100." Contradictions much? Way to cover both bases. I'd take Oden, but I'd take Bynum. What???? </div> No contradictions my friend, I said if oden and the 2005 bynum were both in a draft i would have taken Oden, but today knowning where both players stand today, i would take Bynum. And i did not know Andrew had more than one knee surgery. Also that lakers team had Kobe, Radmanovic, Odom and fisher ahead of Bynum. He was in for his defensive presense alone, Not scoring. </div> So a franchise center that has Radmans, Fisher, and Odom ahead of him? Do you want Radmans and Fisher to be in your top 4 scorers? </div> Ok the kid is 20 years old and averaged just about 13 points per game, that is not bad at all imho. And like i said before, He needs to improve offensively, but 13ppg for his first year as a starter is not so bad for a 20 year old freak. And Honestly I dont expect Bynum to score 30 a night, 2 or 3 years from now hell be a 20-10 guy for sure. http://www.nba.com/lakers/stats/2007/index.html Odom averaged 14 ppg while fisher almost 11. So he was behind Kobe and just a tad behind Odom (1 more ppg than Bynum)whom is a proven vet and an all around player. Once again, scoring is not his forte but he isnt horrible either.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 02:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 01:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 02:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 01:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 01:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Bynum isn't a defensive anchor or franchise player. He averaged 13 and 10. Would you have drafted Bynum over Oden if you had the chance?</div> Are you kidding me? The A-train is a beast defensively. I cant believe you just said that. Defensively he is sound, but offensively is where he needs to improve and tell me if the Blazers had Bynum instead of Oden people wouldnt be calling him a "Franchise player" too.. come on now. And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team. Also to answer your other question i dont think most people knew how good Bynum could be and how quickly he would start to Blossom so we didnt hear as much fuzz with him unlike with Oden and people calling him the next " Tim Duncan" So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100. And how can you call Oden a " Franchise player" or a defensive anchor if he hasnt even played a game yet!! YOU JUST CANNOT DO THAT! </div> Reading comprehension. I said Oden has the ability to become a franchise player and defensive anchor. Bynum is NOT a defensive anchor. Stop relying on how many blocks per game a player has to judge his defensive abilities. I'll always question Bynum's work ethic and attitude, too. He's a guy who is playing for a contract...when he gets that contract, you better hope he keeps playing as hard as he can. Oden has had one knee injury, Bynum has had recurring. That's not good. If Oden hurts his knee again, it's a huge worry, but Bynum is now 20 years old and has had more than one issue with his knee. What do you mean he didn't have to score for that Lakers team? They had Kobe...and that's about it. "So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100." Contradictions much? Way to cover both bases. I'd take Oden, but I'd take Bynum. What““ </div> No contradictions my friend, I said if oden and the 2005 bynum were both in a draft i would have taken Oden, but today knowning where both players stand today, i would take Bynum. And i did not know Andrew had more than one knee surgery. Also that lakers team had Kobe, Radmanovic, Odom and fisher ahead of Bynum. He was in for his defensive presense alone, Not scoring. </div> So a franchise center that has Radmans, Fisher, and Odom ahead of him? Do you want Radmans and Fisher to be in your top 4 scorers? </div> Ok the kid is 20 years old and averaged just about 13 points per game, that is not bad at all imho. And like i said before, He needs to improve offensively, but 13ppg for his first year as a starter is not so bad for a 20 year old freak. And Honestly I dont expect Bynum to score 30 a night, 2 or 3 years from now hell be a 20-10 guy for sure. http://www.nba.com/lakers/stats/2007/index.html Odom averaged 14 ppg while fisher almost 11. So he was behind Kobe and just a tad behind Odom (1 more ppg than Bynum)whom is a proven vet and an all around player. Once again, scoring is not his forte but he isnt horrible either. </div> So he didn't need to score or he didn't score because he was still young? Make up your mind.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 01:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 02:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 01:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 02:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 01:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 01:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Bynum isn't a defensive anchor or franchise player. He averaged 13 and 10. Would you have drafted Bynum over Oden if you had the chance?</div> Are you kidding me? The A-train is a beast defensively. I cant believe you just said that. Defensively he is sound, but offensively is where he needs to improve and tell me if the Blazers had Bynum instead of Oden people wouldnt be calling him a "Franchise player" too.. come on now. And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team. Also to answer your other question i dont think most people knew how good Bynum could be and how quickly he would start to Blossom so we didnt hear as much fuzz with him unlike with Oden and people calling him the next " Tim Duncan" So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100. And how can you call Oden a " Franchise player" or a defensive anchor if he hasnt even played a game yet!! YOU JUST CANNOT DO THAT! </div> Reading comprehension. I said Oden has the ability to become a franchise player and defensive anchor. Bynum is NOT a defensive anchor. Stop relying on how many blocks per game a player has to judge his defensive abilities. I'll always question Bynum's work ethic and attitude, too. He's a guy who is playing for a contract...when he gets that contract, you better hope he keeps playing as hard as he can. Oden has had one knee injury, Bynum has had recurring. That's not good. If Oden hurts his knee again, it's a huge worry, but Bynum is now 20 years old and has had more than one issue with his knee. What do you mean he didn't have to score for that Lakers team? They had Kobe...and that's about it. "So if I had to pick one i probably would have gone with Oden, But for this game and where Bynum is at this point today and where Oden is at right now, I would go with Bynum %100." Contradictions much? Way to cover both bases. I'd take Oden, but I'd take Bynum. What““ </div> No contradictions my friend, I said if oden and the 2005 bynum were both in a draft i would have taken Oden, but today knowning where both players stand today, i would take Bynum. And i did not know Andrew had more than one knee surgery. Also that lakers team had Kobe, Radmanovic, Odom and fisher ahead of Bynum. He was in for his defensive presense alone, Not scoring. </div> So a franchise center that has Radmans, Fisher, and Odom ahead of him? Do you want Radmans and Fisher to be in your top 4 scorers? </div> Ok the kid is 20 years old and averaged just about 13 points per game, that is not bad at all imho. And like i said before, He needs to improve offensively, but 13ppg for his first year as a starter is not so bad for a 20 year old freak. And Honestly I dont expect Bynum to score 30 a night, 2 or 3 years from now hell be a 20-10 guy for sure. http://www.nba.com/lakers/stats/2007/index.html Odom averaged 14 ppg while fisher almost 11. So he was behind Kobe and just a tad behind Odom (1 more ppg than Bynum)whom is a proven vet and an all around player. Once again, scoring is not his forte but he isnt horrible either. </div> So he didn't need to score or he didn't score because he was still young? Make up your mind. </div> What?! He really didnt need to score all that much ( Besides kobe, the scoring was pretty well balanced) and he is a YOUNG player. Can you point to me where I said that he didnt score good enough because of his age? Thank you.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud)</div><div class='quotemain'>And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team.</div> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud)</div><div class='quotemain'>Ok the kid is 20 years old and averaged just about 13 points per game, that is not bad at all imho. And like i said before, He needs to improve offensively, but 13ppg for his first year as a starter is not so bad for a 20 year old freak.</div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 02:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud)</div><div class='quotemain'>And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team.</div> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud)</div><div class='quotemain'>Ok the kid is 20 years old and averaged just about 13 points per game, that is not bad at all imho. And like i said before, He needs to improve offensively, but 13ppg for his first year as a starter is not so bad for a 20 year old freak.</div> </div> Are you serious???? This is retarded. The first sentence says that he averaged 13ppg while not needing to score more on a well balanced team correct? The second sentence says that he is merely 20 years old ( as is Oden BTW) and that on his first year as the starting C he averaged 13ppg right? I dont see where i used his age as an impediment for his scoring. Also can you tell me what makes you think Oden is better than Bynum? And can you prove it?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Aug 8 2008, 02:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I guess you won't answer my question. If you would trade Oden straight up for Bynum, say so!</div> ARGH! I thought I did already.. I wouldnt make that trade now because I dont know how Oden will do in the upcoming season(since he hasnt played a game ever), But get back to me in a year or so. I know what Bynum can do, but I dont know what Greg can. And since he was labeled "The next Tim Duncan" I will have to wait and see how he does first before I make my decision. I hope that answered your question Mr.G
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 03:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 02:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud)</div><div class='quotemain'>And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team.</div> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud)</div><div class='quotemain'>Ok the kid is 20 years old and averaged just about 13 points per game, that is not bad at all imho. And like i said before, He needs to improve offensively, but 13ppg for his first year as a starter is not so bad for a 20 year old freak.</div> </div> Also can you tell me what makes you think Oden is better than Bynum? And can you prove it? </div> How can I prove what makes me think Oden is better than Bynum?
Oden was pimped big-time by a lot of people throughout his college season and going into the draft. As if he is the next LeBron type player (franchise, not position-wise). Bynum has been brought along so slowly that Lakers fans have voiced a lot of displeasure with his lack of PT all along. Last season, he looked like an absolute beast at both ends. They still limited his PT, and he did suffer an injury. Both players suffered injuries, in fact, and Oden played hurt his college season, too. It's hard to say whether they're both going to be injury prone or have shorter than expected careers at this point. Bynum's play was so outstanding, you might say he's growing into the same class as Dwight Howard (not there quite yet). Would anyone trade the two players for one another? It'd actually be a good trade, but pointless. It's certain that Bynum has proven what he minimally can do at the pro level, which is not so certain with Oden (though expected).
If you wouldn't trade Oden straight up for Bynum, I can only conclude that you agree with Kid Chocolate and would have selected Oden before Bynum.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Aug 8 2008, 01:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>If you wouldn't trade Oden straight up for Bynum, I can only conclude that you agree with Kid Chocolate and would have selected Oden before Bynum.</div> What do you think Oden's rookie season numbers are going to be? (MPG, PPG, RPG, BPG) What do you think they're going to be at their peak sometime in his career?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 03:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 8 2008, 03:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 8 2008, 02:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud)</div><div class='quotemain'>And yes he did average 13ppg, BUT he really didnt need to score for that Lakers team.</div> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud)</div><div class='quotemain'>Ok the kid is 20 years old and averaged just about 13 points per game, that is not bad at all imho. And like i said before, He needs to improve offensively, but 13ppg for his first year as a starter is not so bad for a 20 year old freak.</div> </div> Also can you tell me what makes you think Oden is better than Bynum? And can you prove it? </div> How can I prove what makes me think Oden is better than Bynum? </div> You can't, that's my point. Also KC stated that Bynum had more than one knee surgery... Can someone give me a link because I truly did not know that. Thanks
